Author Topic: RC needed for prospect extension interprepation  (Read 2888 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Colby

  • MLFB Founder
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Posts: 28820
  • Bonus inPoints: 27
    • :PIT-NFL:
    • :Blank:
    • :PIT-NHL:
    • :PennState:
    • :UnitedStates:
    • View Profile
RC needed for prospect extension interprepation
« on: June 16, 2011, 06:50:37 PM »
Quote
I'm confused... so if someone signs their prospect to an extension, the extension kicks in following the end of his prospect eligibility, or the following year... cause if that is the case take the extension off of Ike until this is sorted out. I didn't foresee this becoming an issue when he was signed.

My take on it, if you want the full percentage then you take it that year. You want the player signed for the following year you take the following years percentage. For instance, Ike again. Signed this year it is 60%, if I want the contract to take hold next year, then it should be 50%, so on and so forth. I think this needs to be discussed further

That was Dan... my thinking is that the percentage is based on the period the contract is awarded, not started.  This is consistent with other approaches.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Learn about :Commish: inPoints and the Invitationals.

Dan Wood

  • Guest
Re: RC needed for prospect extension interprepation
« Reply #1 on: June 16, 2011, 07:17:34 PM »
Where the rub lies now, is that we voted you can sign a guy at the end of his final eligibility season and have it take hold the following year. So since that is already in effect, we might need to have all prospect extensions begin the following season, just to be consistent.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline Colby

  • MLFB Founder
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Posts: 28820
  • Bonus inPoints: 27
    • :PIT-NFL:
    • :Blank:
    • :PIT-NHL:
    • :PennState:
    • :UnitedStates:
    • View Profile
Re: RC needed for prospect extension interprepation
« Reply #2 on: June 16, 2011, 07:31:10 PM »
Where the rub lies now, is that we voted you can sign a guy at the end of his final eligibility season and have it take hold the following year. So since that is already in effect, we might need to have all prospect extensions begin the following season, just to be consistent.

This was established in the rules.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Learn about :Commish: inPoints and the Invitationals.

Dan Wood

  • Guest
Re: RC needed for prospect extension interprepation
« Reply #3 on: June 16, 2011, 07:38:56 PM »
This was established in the rules.

Which part? It doesn't go on to say that if you sign a guy during the season when it takes hold, and what the effect of the percentages will have. All we voted on, and passed, was that you can sign a guy after the season and it will take hold the following season. Also what was established was that once the season ends, you can still sign a player in his final year of eligibility to an extension. What is lacking in wording in regards to prior to that.

Now that we can sign players, and have the contract start the following season, we didn't discuss how this would effect the prospect extensions. When they were created, you could not sign a player for the following year, now you can.

If we are to be consistent with what we already voted on - #2 - then we should have prospect extension start the following season, just like any other extension. What this does is give GMs another year of control. Back to Ike, I sign him now, it starts next season in 2012, I control him now at 4 mil for the following 5 years. Or should we have to take the contract on that season? That is what I think we need to suss out.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline h4cheng

  • MVP
  • ****
  • Join Date: Nov 2009
  • Posts: 4198
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: RC needed for prospect extension interprepation
« Reply #4 on: June 16, 2011, 08:06:44 PM »
For me, extension should be at the rate at the time the extension is announced, to take effect when the existing contract ends.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Dan Wood

  • Guest
Re: RC needed for prospect extension interprepation
« Reply #5 on: June 16, 2011, 08:23:56 PM »
Yes but prospect contracts run for four years, that is the existing contract. Which is both way too complicated to keep track of, as well as unrealistic to have a guy for what could be nine years for a minimal amount.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline Colby

  • MLFB Founder
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Posts: 28820
  • Bonus inPoints: 27
    • :PIT-NFL:
    • :Blank:
    • :PIT-NHL:
    • :PennState:
    • :UnitedStates:
    • View Profile
Re: RC needed for prospect extension interprepation
« Reply #6 on: June 16, 2011, 08:28:42 PM »
Dan, you aren't seeing the big picture.  Term limits apply to prospect extensions.  Therefore, taking advantage of the prospect extension in 2011 for a P-2013 contract would only add three years under the prospect extension with the value taken as of 2011.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Learn about :Commish: inPoints and the Invitationals.

Dan Wood

  • Guest
Re: RC needed for prospect extension interprepation
« Reply #7 on: June 16, 2011, 08:58:53 PM »
Dan, you aren't seeing the big picture.  Term limits apply to prospect extensions.  Therefore, taking advantage of the prospect extension in 2011 for a P-2013 contract would only add three years under the prospect extension with the value taken as of 2011.

I realize that, my question is when should they go into effect? Again back to Ike. I like talking in examples it is better to visualize. Now I signed him in 2011, he is P-2013. His 'discount' is 60% this year. My question is, given the same situation, given the new rules, would it take effect in 2012, and not 2011. Like our new rule pertaining to contract extensions. Would the new extension rule apply to prospect extensions. That is what I am trying to clarify.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline Colby

  • MLFB Founder
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Posts: 28820
  • Bonus inPoints: 27
    • :PIT-NFL:
    • :Blank:
    • :PIT-NHL:
    • :PennState:
    • :UnitedStates:
    • View Profile
Re: RC needed for prospect extension interprepation
« Reply #8 on: June 16, 2011, 09:56:39 PM »
A similar player to Ike would take effect 2014 and last through 2016.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Learn about :Commish: inPoints and the Invitationals.

Dan Wood

  • Guest
Re: RC needed for prospect extension interprepation
« Reply #9 on: June 16, 2011, 10:31:03 PM »
Now I'm completely lost. Someone please explain it to me. The prospect extension rule is as such...

"Any player who is currently under a prospect contract may be signed to a regular contract extension (see below), but they may also be signed to a prospect extension.  Such an extension must be a 5-year deal where the annual salary is X% of their market value.  The resulting annual salary must be no less than $4m."

Now what am I missing? If you sign someone to a PE - it is for 5 years. Now that we are starting extensions the following year, do prospect extensions start immediately, next season, or at the end of the contract (which I honestly don't think is a consideration)?
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

 

Forum Search


Quick Profile

 
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

* Chat Room

Refresh History
  • STLBlues91: Yeah I just sold my first year when taking over as I didnt have the roster. After my first season I ended up with 3 of the top 8 picks. Lots of luck and trades to be where I am going into year 3
    Yesterday at 09:00:06 PM
  • Braves155: IN NFL LIVE a player with any type role on a team can contribute & add value. After the 1st week of FA look at the FA wire...there will only be scraps
    Yesterday at 09:09:26 PM
  • Braves155: I also think this is a top-heavy, but deep Draft.
    Yesterday at 09:10:21 PM
  • Daddy: Big NFL LIVE trade. Who is sleeping? While you slept Brian has gone out and made a power move.
    Yesterday at 09:51:42 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: nice move to recpoup
    Yesterday at 10:18:36 PM
  • Rhino7: @Daddy, thanks for what you said lol. It was the ultimate challenge to beat JWalkerjr88 last season, I wanted my path to go through him so it makes my title run that much better! I just wanted to get to the SB and figured at that point anything can happen and lucky for me, my boys had enough left to take out BAB. Live is the most challenging league I’m in and most fun, so thanks for what you all do to make it that way.
    Yesterday at 10:28:58 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: Rhino that was a pretty close final too i think
    Yesterday at 10:41:59 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: eitrher than or i had somekey players not perfoem well at all regardless great win by u
    Yesterday at 10:43:31 PM
  • Rhino7: Appreciate it, your team is solid. I expect to see you make another run
    Yesterday at 10:46:37 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: You did well Rhino. I appreciate the battle. The loss didnt sting more because i was undefeated, i know fully that being undefeated in the reg season doesnt mean anything in the playoffs. When rhino and i played this past season, the better team won.
    Yesterday at 10:58:04 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: This next year im coming full force. So far my pattern is win a chip every other year. Lets keep the streak going!!
    Yesterday at 10:58:35 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: im coming back too
    Yesterday at 11:02:00 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: lets see if my team performs like last yr
    Yesterday at 11:02:10 PM
  • Daddy: Well.. if im undefeated heading into the NFC Title game & I lose. I may beat up my neighbor. I dont like that guy anyway.
    Yesterday at 11:07:13 PM
  • Daddy: I hate losing. Especially when its the biggest moments. I hate my teams i root for to lose. I really hate for the teams i built myself to lose.
    Yesterday at 11:08:50 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: I dont like losing ever. But a loss is a loss. Im pissed either way
    Yesterday at 11:09:47 PM
  • Braves155: Are you also a perfectionist in your everyday life?
    Yesterday at 11:10:05 PM
  • Daddy: Im not a perfectionist in my dynasty life. I make all kinds of bad trades and make all kinds of mistakes.
    Yesterday at 11:10:51 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: If i traded all my picks to a division rival in a rebuild and he beat me in the title game with Desmond ridder or lose undefeated. Its all a loss at the end of the day
    Yesterday at 11:11:08 PM
  • Daddy: Nobody is right all the time. Its the beauty of sports.
    Yesterday at 11:11:13 PM
  • Daddy: Beat me with Desmond Ridder and i trade for Desmond Ridder.
    Yesterday at 11:11:54 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: You playing chess not checkers lol
    Yesterday at 11:13:04 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: Rhino beat me with goff and then traded goff
    Yesterday at 11:13:44 PM
  • Daddy: It helps to know sports but ive signed guys ive never heard of like SP Dallas Kuechel. Nobody knew who he was. I saw he earned a spot. I took a chance. A couple years later the dude wins the Cy Young.
    Yesterday at 11:14:05 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: 3 out of the 4 starting QBs in the title games have been traded this offseason
    Yesterday at 11:14:21 PM
  • Daddy: I think i had him on a prospect deal.
    Yesterday at 11:14:22 PM
  • Daddy: It helps just to fill up your roster and sign good contracts. If you dont know crap but keep a full roster and manage finances, you will kick ass.
    Yesterday at 11:15:26 PM
  • Daddy: I wasnt a genius signing Kuechel. I was just filling an empty spot. I got rewarded with the best pitcher in baseball for a few seasons.
    Yesterday at 11:16:59 PM
  • Braves155: I love it when one of your Dynasty teams you've been rebuilding starts showing up and being competitive early in the season. Especially in baseball
    Yesterday at 11:19:42 PM
  • Brent: Agreed.  I'm decent at building, but I need to get better st winning.  I did win an offsite 32-team football league, it only took me 1.5 season to rebuild and win.
    Yesterday at 11:25:50 PM
  • Daddy: Thats what you should be doing @Brent. LIVE sharpens those skills so you can go elsewhere and dominate unsuspecting leagues.
    Today at 12:01:29 AM
  • Daddy: I use the same screen name on every site. So the sites I'm visiting/competing, know who is putting foots to them.
    Today at 12:02:47 AM
  • Daddy: And they know where they can find me. Along with the growing list of LIVE GMs who would put more foots to them.
    Today at 12:03:48 AM
  • Daddy: If "Daddy" appears on your site. He wears a size 13 and you know it.
    Today at 12:04:44 AM
  • indiansnation: Braves155 pm
    Today at 09:13:06 AM
  • Brent: Driving to Disney today.  I'll check PMs when I can.
    Today at 10:00:49 AM
  • Braves155: Responded indiansnation
    Today at 11:01:14 AM
  • indiansnation: Jealker pm
    Today at 11:19:23 AM
  • Jwalkerjr88: Back brian
    Today at 11:20:22 AM
  • indiansnation: Jwalker pm
    Today at 11:20:55 AM
  • indiansnation: Jimw pm
    Today at 11:50:01 AM
  • indiansnation: Back at u jwalker
    Today at 11:50:44 AM
  • Daddy: NFL trades never seem to stop.
    Today at 12:59:59 PM
  • indiansnation: Jimw pm
    Today at 01:26:00 PM
  • indiansnation: Colts looking for a couple te and starting rb in nfl live
    Today at 01:27:34 PM
  • indiansnation: Willing to move draft picks in right deal for starting te and starting rb
    Today at 01:42:27 PM
  • Braves155: MLB LIVE - If anyone has a decent 3B they'll deal, hmu.
    Today at 01:57:55 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: MLB LIVE the giants have struck a deal w the padres
    Today at 02:22:22 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: which is nowposted
    Today at 02:22:29 PM
  • STLBlues91: Ill be around the rest of the day for any talks
    Today at 02:26:26 PM