0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
I think limiting the number of innings too much is equally harmful. This is fantasy baseball after all and some odd scenarios are possible. What happens if a team has its 5 rotation starters pitching twice in the same week? That team would be screwed because the following two weeks they would have only 5 starts a piece and won't even be able to capitalize the one week were they would have the advantage. 65 is probably way too small. 75 or 80 sound more reasonable. 8 starts at 7 innings a pop is 56. Plus some 20 innings in relief leads to 76 IP.
What I mean to say is that with such a low innings limit, we will have weeks when we do not meet the maximum and we won't be able to compensate with the weeks in which more innings are pitched. 5 starts in one week is not enough if each SP throws only 5 innings and your RPs have a lazy week in which they throw only 5-10IP. That means you have a 35 to 40 IP week. Or what happens when you have a pair of weeks in which three or four of your starters are injured - as often happens? In the long run you may end up pitching less than the actual MLB average of IP per week. I think it is better to have an ample amount of IP. Another option would be to limit the amount of IPs for the whole season instead of on a weekly basis. I think the problem that needs to be addressed is pitcher streaming by those teams who have 10, 12 starters every week. It is much better to limit the amount of pitchers used every week than to limit the amount of innings per week to such a small number.
This is why I think 70 IP is a happy medium.