0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
The job definitely should have been made known that it was open. I'll agree to that.
You know what'd be sweet? Giving contracts to GM's! I get a 2 year deal to get the Nats to .500 or I get canned! Might not be a good idea, as I don't want to have my failure planned 2 years in advance.
Chris,I understand where you are coming from and I agree with most of what you said (especially the part about the flawed logic that the league would be stronger if a new GM takes over a good team rather than a bad team). If you want, we can switch teams at the end of the year if I make it to the Championship game.
To bring humor to the subject, I do not believe that a Red Sox fan can be the GM of the Yanks, under any circumstances. We would have had to report this to the Sons of Sam Horn and they would have taken your Red Sox Hat, Jersey, the Bill Buckner VCR tape, and the DVDs of the Championships as well. Just kidding.
I think Chris should be offered the next GM opening, if he would like it. I am not sure the league knew that he was unhappy in SD.To bring humor to the subject, I do not believe that a Red Sox fan can be the GM of the Yanks, under any circumstances. We would have had to report this to the Sons of Sam Horn and they would have taken your Red Sox Hat, Jersey, the Bill Buckner VCR tape, and the DVDs of the Championships as well. Just kidding.
Again a moot point. There is no correlation to a good gm and a good team. I am a fine GM, active here for over a year, and when I took the Padres (as my first team) they were rancid. Still, I am here. If the only way to get new guys is by giving them the best job; we will have a stupid system of recruitment. In other words; all veteran GMs should now step down to the worst teams so bad GMs will stay in the league.If a GM isnt active why would we want them to run a good team? Why do we want a bad GM on any team? We don't. Good GMs don't quit because their team is bad. I can't agree with any argument of why the Yankees being a good team are more likely to retain a GM, or create a better GM.