Poll

It appears that daily lineups and a weekly IP limit are favored.  What should the limit be for weekly IP?

65
1 (5.6%)
75
3 (16.7%)
85
10 (55.6%)
95
1 (5.6%)
105
3 (16.7%)

Total Members Voted: 11

Voting closed: December 10, 2010, 12:33:33 PM

Author Topic: VOTE - Weekly IP Limit Threshold  (Read 1947 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline hank

  • All-Star
  • ***
  • Join Date: Nov 2009
  • Posts: 1019
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: VOTE - Weekly IP Limit Threshold
« Reply #10 on: December 05, 2010, 08:19:15 PM »
85 is reasonable.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
There are lies, there are outrageous lies, and there are statistics.
                                                                                --- Mark Twain

joeshmoe

  • Guest
Re: VOTE - Weekly IP Limit Threshold
« Reply #11 on: December 07, 2010, 12:23:45 AM »
I voted for the most but I think it shouldn't be calculated.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline Colby

  • MLFB Founder
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Posts: 28820
  • Bonus inPoints: 27
    • :PIT-NFL:
    • :Blank:
    • :PIT-NHL:
    • :PennState:
    • :UnitedStates:
    • View Profile
Re: VOTE - Weekly IP Limit Threshold
« Reply #12 on: December 13, 2010, 01:49:08 PM »
60% of the league voted... The majority of those people voted for 85 IP.  The weighted average of the voting leads to 86.11 IP.  One-third of the league supported the 85 IP cap.

 :judge:

The 85 IP weekly limit is official.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Learn about :Commish: inPoints and the Invitationals.

Offline rcankosy

  • All-Star
  • ***
  • Join Date: Oct 2009
  • Posts: 2483
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: VOTE - Weekly IP Limit Threshold
« Reply #13 on: June 15, 2011, 12:19:24 PM »
I am always in favor of change for the good, but I am curious why I was the only one who voted for 65 when this poll was first taken.  It seems as if some people have done a 180 on this.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline Colby

  • MLFB Founder
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Posts: 28820
  • Bonus inPoints: 27
    • :PIT-NFL:
    • :Blank:
    • :PIT-NHL:
    • :PennState:
    • :UnitedStates:
    • View Profile
Re: VOTE - Weekly IP Limit Threshold
« Reply #14 on: June 15, 2011, 12:32:41 PM »
I am always in favor of change for the good, but I am curious why I was the only one who voted for 65 when this poll was first taken.  It seems as if some people have done a 180 on this.

I voted for 85 IP and want it to be lowered a bit.  A couple of my basic keeper leagues roll with 70 IP which work out very well.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Learn about :Commish: inPoints and the Invitationals.

Online Paul S.

  • League Moderator
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2009
  • Posts: 21995
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: VOTE - Weekly IP Limit Threshold
« Reply #15 on: June 15, 2011, 02:13:01 PM »
I voted for 85IP and am still not convinced that it needs to be lowered.  Lowering the limit only allows people to carry more hitters or prospects.  The EDR will eventually allow us to carry enough prospects.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Dan Wood

  • Guest
Re: VOTE - Weekly IP Limit Threshold
« Reply #16 on: June 15, 2011, 07:17:59 PM »
I voted for 75, but only because I wanted to be cautious. I think 70 is a good number. I think the reason to have a lower inning limit is to stop SP hoarding. Or to maybe have teams keep their players and fill out a roster. I would like to see this league move towards that, where most if not all teams boast competitive rosters on a week to week basis. I think allowing such a high inning limits, enables a contending team to deal a fringy prospect for a fringy pitcher - and or batter - meaning the teams that have good records will just roll over the dismantled teams later on in the season.

As we have seen, many teams who considered themselves out of it, capitalized on the value of their players and dealt them to top teams - myself included. If we lower innings, this might curb this practice, and it also might lower the prices of free agents, since teams will already have players who will play.

I know this is a standard practice in MLB, but my argument is and always has been, that we cannot call up prospects once a starter is dealt. If I deal Narveson, I do not have he power to call up J.D Martin to take his place. MLB GMs do have that luxury. As Daniel mentioned earlier in this post (or another - don't remember) what if injuries strike? Well I am proof positive that you end up being screwed regardless. It really doesn't matter if you get 800 pitching points one week and then your whole staff goes on the mend. Those points don't carry over. If injuries hit, it doesn't matter how many pitchers you have, if you find yourself in that unlucky situation. It would have been great if I had the option to call up Travis Snider from AAA when Adam Lind went on the DL, but I could not. Same holds for pitching and pitchers.

Keeping a lower innings limit allows for GMs to be a little more craftier than throwing starter after starter out there, plus it will increase the value of good to great starting pitchers. One guy could end up being equal to two guys as far as FPG.

Just my two cents, but in a league this size I believe we need to have a lowered inning limits just to maintain, or even equal out the disparity in the league.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Canada8999

  • Guest
Re: VOTE - Weekly IP Limit Threshold
« Reply #17 on: June 15, 2011, 08:15:38 PM »
Keeping a lower innings limit allows for GMs to be a little more craftier than throwing starter after starter out there, plus it will increase the value of good to great starting pitchers. One guy could end up being equal to two guys as far as FPG.

Just my two cents, but in a league this size I believe we need to have a lowered inning limits just to maintain, or even equal out the disparity in the league.

 :iatp:
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

 

Forum Search


Quick Profile

 
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

* Chat Room

Refresh History
  • BayAreaBallers: jwalker replied
    May 26, 2024, 06:19:35 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: Back BAB
    May 26, 2024, 06:33:24 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: back at ya jwalker
    May 26, 2024, 06:34:01 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: Daddy your wwait wont me much longer
    May 26, 2024, 07:39:35 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: deal abt to be posted here soon
    May 26, 2024, 07:39:43 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: there u have it teh 2 superbowl teams have made a deal
    May 26, 2024, 07:48:33 PM
  • Rhino7: :toast:
    May 26, 2024, 07:50:49 PM
  • dbreer23: Acuna to miss the rest of 2024 - torn ACL in left knee (last time was his right knee0
    May 26, 2024, 11:41:43 PM
  • jimw: Wow, he had said he thought it wasn't that serious.  I hope he can overcome these knee injuries
    Yesterday at 12:41:59 AM
  • Mt_Crushmore: Jimw pm sent
    Yesterday at 01:17:16 AM
  • STLBlues91: im around the rest of the day
    Yesterday at 03:08:45 PM
  • Daddy: Acuna fantasy owners world round didn't want to hear that. Not sure who has him in LIVE but its universally devastating news for Acuna fans.
    Yesterday at 03:30:59 PM
  • Daddy: Anyone feeling down, can perk up because the Philadelphia Phillies are good at baseball.
    Yesterday at 03:32:54 PM
  • Daddy: I feel better already.
    Yesterday at 03:33:50 PM
  • indiansnation: Good afternoon all
    Yesterday at 04:00:17 PM
  • indiansnation: It is 3:20pm and the phillies still suck.
    Yesterday at 04:17:18 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: i hope phillies choke this lead
    Yesterday at 07:34:08 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: Ask and I shall receive way to go giants
    Yesterday at 07:47:52 PM
  • Daddy: Playing Cleveland this week... I will catch SF later.
    Yesterday at 08:13:52 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: srry daddy as a giants fan we needed to win this game vs yall
    Yesterday at 08:24:12 PM
  • Daddy: Ditto LIVE. Youre in a remarkable battle. Revenge to me comes in whatever way i can get it. :rofl:
    Yesterday at 08:29:05 PM
  • Daddy: Hockey is coming. A new battlefield.
    Yesterday at 08:30:53 PM
  • Daddy: Who wants my picks? :rofl:
    Yesterday at 08:31:23 PM
  • indiansnation: I want your hockey picks
    Yesterday at 08:46:56 PM
  • Daddy: I would only trade them to LA and LA has no current profsl owner.
    Yesterday at 08:48:11 PM
  • Daddy: Some outside talent dont like the site by looks alone and we are very manual. Its an acquired taste.
    Yesterday at 08:50:10 PM
  • indiansnation: U suck lol
    Yesterday at 08:50:39 PM
  • Daddy: On site hockey talent are "get off my lawn" types that aren't interested in seeing what all the fuss is about. And Brian we can talk but i dont want Grandpa Sid.
    Yesterday at 08:52:29 PM
  • Daddy: Edmonton could get my picks
    Yesterday at 08:53:05 PM
  • Daddy: He talking McDavid type talk. Me like Connor.
    Yesterday at 08:53:34 PM
  • Daddy: All those junior hockey dudes we looked up and put on yalls rosters. I dont know them dudes. I might cut half them jokers.
    Yesterday at 08:56:49 PM
  • Daddy: Ive learned more about global hockey in the last 3 months than i knew my entire life. My brains are scrambled. STLBlues91- brains are scrambled. Fried man.
    Yesterday at 08:58:38 PM
  • Daddy: On to Basketball :)
    Yesterday at 08:59:13 PM
  • Daddy: You have an NHL team. An AHL team. And a 50 player Junior league development squad. In a legit 30 Category dynasty hockey contract league.
    Yesterday at 09:02:09 PM
  • Daddy: Youve never seen anything like that. Nobody has ever seen anything like that. Not in Dynasty hockey. You're welcome. ;)
    Yesterday at 09:03:16 PM
  • Daddy: Franchise? That's what a Franchise looks like.
    Yesterday at 09:07:12 PM
  • STLBlues91: Working on the matching now between spreadsheet/fantrax. My head hurts but got about 12 of them fully done and believe they are 100% good to go. Taking a dinner break and back to plugging in info
    Yesterday at 09:15:38 PM
  • STLBlues91: Ill be back in 20 minutes all pms have been answered
    Yesterday at 09:18:31 PM
  • indiansnation: I feel bad for stlblues91 this guy is busting his but getting everything ready for NFL live
    Yesterday at 11:53:15 PM
  • indiansnation: Watching Dallas stars comeback and beat edm
    Yesterday at 11:54:24 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: im happy to see teh stars doing that for my boi pavs
    Today at 12:03:46 AM
  • indiansnation: That had to be one of the best hockey playoff games I seen this yr
    Today at 12:32:34 AM
  • indiansnation: Anybody want to talk trade
    Today at 12:33:26 AM
  • BayAreaBallers: stars are a tough team
    Today at 12:33:29 AM
  • indiansnation: It was just amazing how Edmonton was leading and then all of a sudden 2 period starts and Dallas just took over after that and just kicked Edmonton ass
    Today at 12:35:55 AM
  • Daddy: Flyers have the 12th overall pick & whatever Florida finishes with.
    Today at 01:09:39 AM
  • Daddy: We are open for business.
    Today at 01:10:32 AM
  • BayAreaBallers: sharks could be interested in those picks
    Today at 01:16:53 AM
  • STLBlues91: STL will be open for business as well
    Today at 01:23:26 AM
  • ldsjayhawk: @Daddy are you intending to trade all of your picks in NHL as well or different strategy there?
    Today at 11:25:13 AM