Author Topic: Scoring for pitching  (Read 6030 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline rcankosy

  • All-Star
  • ***
  • Join Date: Oct 2009
  • Posts: 2459
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: Scoring for pitching
« Reply #30 on: November 22, 2011, 08:00:26 PM »
Which column is the finished number, the balanced number?

Column X = Game Score balanced
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Dan Wood

  • Guest
Re: Scoring for pitching
« Reply #31 on: November 26, 2011, 12:35:08 PM »
Guys, just wanted to say you for the effort. I appreciate it, as I am sure the rest of the league does. The only problem that I have with it, is that most pitchers seem to have a decrease in their scoring. There is a slight shuffle overall in the top 5, but from where I stand, I'm still going to have to say we stick with what we have. I'm throwing it out to everyone else to get some dialogue going.

Thanks
D
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline h4cheng

  • MVP
  • ****
  • Join Date: Nov 2009
  • Posts: 4198
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: Scoring for pitching
« Reply #32 on: November 26, 2011, 08:24:51 PM »
Dan, I understand the concern, but I think it's a bit misplaced. The impact of the scoring change is -0.1% for all pitchers.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline Colby

  • MLFB Founder
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Posts: 28820
  • Bonus inPoints: 27
    • :PIT-NFL:
    • :Blank:
    • :PIT-NHL:
    • :PennState:
    • :UnitedStates:
    • View Profile
Re: Scoring for pitching
« Reply #33 on: November 29, 2011, 10:25:33 AM »
Dan, I understand the concern, but I think it's a bit misplaced. The impact of the scoring change is -0.1% for all pitchers.

That's a small change... I think the major problem people had with the scoring was the holes in the pitching stats.  You could compare two SP outings and know that the one was superior but it scored far less points due to GB and IP.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Learn about :Commish: inPoints and the Invitationals.

Offline h4cheng

  • MVP
  • ****
  • Join Date: Nov 2009
  • Posts: 4198
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: Scoring for pitching
« Reply #34 on: December 04, 2011, 09:54:48 PM »
That's a small change... I think the major problem people had with the scoring was the holes in the pitching stats.  You could compare two SP outings and know that the one was superior but it scored far less points due to GB and IP.

Let's take the Liriano no hitter an example:

Points under current system: 27
Game Score Balanced: 124.5
Points under the proposed system: 75.75

Evidently, the proposed system takes greater consideration the actual outcome of the pitching performance.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline rcankosy

  • All-Star
  • ***
  • Join Date: Oct 2009
  • Posts: 2459
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: Scoring for pitching
« Reply #35 on: December 08, 2011, 11:57:13 AM »
Is it time for the RC to officially vote on this?  In my opinion, we should give the RC 7-10 days to vote on this and put this to bed.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline Colby

  • MLFB Founder
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Posts: 28820
  • Bonus inPoints: 27
    • :PIT-NFL:
    • :Blank:
    • :PIT-NHL:
    • :PennState:
    • :UnitedStates:
    • View Profile
Re: Scoring for pitching
« Reply #36 on: December 08, 2011, 12:19:11 PM »
Is it time for the RC to officially vote on this?  In my opinion, we should give the RC 7-10 days to vote on this and put this to bed.

 :iatp:
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Learn about :Commish: inPoints and the Invitationals.

Dan Wood

  • Guest
Re: Scoring for pitching
« Reply #37 on: December 08, 2011, 05:29:39 PM »
Can we even do it now since we are using Fantrax?
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline h4cheng

  • MVP
  • ****
  • Join Date: Nov 2009
  • Posts: 4198
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: Scoring for pitching
« Reply #38 on: December 08, 2011, 06:14:59 PM »
Can we even do it now since we are using Fantrax?

yes

all the components of game score are in fantrax.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Dan Wood

  • Guest
Re: Scoring for pitching
« Reply #39 on: December 08, 2011, 06:45:53 PM »
I vote nay to new scoring - keep old scoring
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

 

Forum Search


Quick Profile

 
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

* Chat Room

Refresh History
  • Rob: Hopefully you're not what I think you are
    Yesterday at 01:46:33 PM
  • Rob: Which is, Zach Wilson.
    Yesterday at 01:46:38 PM
  • janesvilleaces: Daddy pm
    Yesterday at 01:54:14 PM
  • Renegade: So what’s happening
    Yesterday at 03:54:16 PM
  • Renegade: My 1st time playing college football fantasy
    Yesterday at 03:56:40 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: @Rob ive seen that take a few times. “Drake Maye=Zach Wilson”. Thats not how i see it. The Physical tools and demeanor alone are very different between the two. I like maye alot
    Yesterday at 03:58:58 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: Are you a patriots fan @rob ?
    Yesterday at 03:59:21 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: Jwalkejr88 pm
    Yesterday at 04:01:47 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: jwalkerjr88 replied back
    Yesterday at 04:18:37 PM
  • indiansnation: Good evening all which league we talking trade.
    Yesterday at 04:47:08 PM
  • Mt_Crushmore: im nfl
    Yesterday at 04:47:43 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: Understood BAB
    Yesterday at 05:00:25 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: Always NFL Brian
    Yesterday at 05:00:36 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: Yepp
    Yesterday at 05:06:57 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: Can't wait to see the madness
    Yesterday at 05:10:27 PM
  • Daddy: God im sooooooo busy today. Im trying to get errands and profsl done before the draft :doh:
    Yesterday at 06:05:24 PM
  • Daddy: There is no way but im gonna keep at it.
    Yesterday at 06:06:27 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: as long as u r here for draft
    Yesterday at 06:08:49 PM
  • janesvilleaces: Go pack go
    Yesterday at 07:26:45 PM
  • Daddy: I thought i had converted you to a Ram fan by now @janes (insert eye emoji)
    Yesterday at 07:35:47 PM
  • Braves155: Sup guys
    Yesterday at 07:35:57 PM
  • Daddy: NFL DRAFT second only to the NFL LIVE Draft in entertainment!
    Yesterday at 08:52:12 PM
  • Daddy: 8/1/24 8PM Change your NFL LIVE teams future with these guys right here!
    Yesterday at 08:52:53 PM
  • Mt_Crushmore: Plan on it.
    Yesterday at 09:25:23 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: Interesting developments so far. If you need a QB in NFL Live. Plenty of them have 1st round pedigree
    Yesterday at 10:53:26 PM
  • Daddy: NFL LIVE Draft Room [link] current picks, 2024 preview & history.
    Yesterday at 11:06:17 PM
  • Braves155: Daddy, what are your thoughts on the NFL Draft thus far?
    Yesterday at 11:34:39 PM
  • Braves155: Or anyone, what ya think?
    Yesterday at 11:35:07 PM
  • dbreer23: Vegeta100 PM
    Yesterday at 11:40:43 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: Alot of surprised tonight as expected. Offensive heavy. 6 QBs in the 1st. 7 WRs. Fun night
    Today at 12:52:03 AM
  • Jwalkerjr88: Alot of NFL Live implications. Cant wait to see it unfold. On to night 2
    Today at 12:52:28 AM
  • BayAreaBallers: i wish we took cooper Frick
    Today at 01:05:02 AM
  • BayAreaBallers: we coulda waited on pearsall
    Today at 01:05:12 AM
  • BayAreaBallers: as much as i do like him a bit cuz he was dceent at ASU and solid at UF
    Today at 01:05:26 AM
  • Daddy: Who is cooper Frick? What position he play
    Today at 02:57:55 AM
  • Brent: BAB, yeah, Cooper is a beast.
    Today at 07:21:11 AM
  • BayAreaBallers: Daddy I was just expressing my displeasure that we passed on cooper dejean. I strongly felt cb was a bigger need or ol than wr
    Today at 10:28:14 AM
  • Daddy: I get it
    Today at 10:39:43 AM
  • Daddy: I dont understand everything i saw last night. The biggest winner to me was Gardner Minshew
    Today at 10:40:41 AM
  • Daddy: Raiders, Atlanta both should have traded back if they were gonna do what they did. IMO
    Today at 10:41:23 AM
  • Daddy: Atlanta could have fleeced Minny and let them draft JJ #6 then still get Penix before Denver/LV
    Today at 10:42:24 AM
  • Daddy: Its like Brian is running the Raiders.
    Today at 10:43:02 AM
  • BayAreaBallers: ya know what speaking of gardener I did trade for him this off-season
    Today at 10:46:49 AM
  • BayAreaBallers: I honestly wouldn't have minded pearsall but I saw him as a Rd 2 target not Rd 1. Great to see another former alumni join the niners.
    Today at 10:48:21 AM
  • Daddy: 49ers made a smart pick IMO.
    Today at 02:25:27 PM
  • Daddy: Their WRs need contracts and Deebo has been used a lot for a guy his size already.
    Today at 02:26:18 PM
  • Daddy: They cant and wont keep them all beyond this year.
    Today at 02:27:17 PM
  • Daddy: Plenty of Defense left. Only 9 guys on D got drafted last night. NONE of them will be 1st rd picks in LIVE. In fact i dont think a D player gets drafted at all in LIVE till round 3.
    Today at 02:29:01 PM
  • Daddy: If you want a S or CB @BAB your Niners will get one.
    Today at 02:30:45 PM
  • Daddy: If anyone questions the potency or quality of Colorado marijuana, i got two words for you. Bo Nix
    Today at 02:32:52 PM