Author Topic: Extending Prospects  (Read 2987 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Colby

  • MLFB Founder
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Posts: 28820
  • Bonus inPoints: 27
    • :PIT-NFL:
    • :Blank:
    • :PIT-NHL:
    • :PennState:
    • :UnitedStates:
    • View Profile
Re: Extending Prospects
« Reply #20 on: April 15, 2010, 09:00:58 PM »
 :bump:
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Learn about :Commish: inPoints and the Invitationals.

Canada8999

  • Guest
Re: Extending Prospects
« Reply #21 on: April 18, 2010, 02:31:39 PM »
So what is the current proposal?
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline Colby

  • MLFB Founder
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Posts: 28820
  • Bonus inPoints: 27
    • :PIT-NFL:
    • :Blank:
    • :PIT-NHL:
    • :PennState:
    • :UnitedStates:
    • View Profile
Re: Extending Prospects
« Reply #22 on: April 18, 2010, 02:57:28 PM »
Prospect Extension
Any player who is currently under a prospect contract may be signed to a regular contract extension, but they may also be signed to a prospect extension.  Such an extension must be a 5-year deal where the annual salary is X% of their market value.

For the 20XX season, the following percentages would be used per prospect status.

20XX - 60%
20XX+1 - 50%
20XX+2 - 40%
20XX+3, n/a - 30%

This is more in line with what Dan originally brought up.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Learn about :Commish: inPoints and the Invitationals.

Canada8999

  • Guest
Re: Extending Prospects
« Reply #23 on: April 18, 2010, 04:45:02 PM »
Prospect Extension
Any player who is currently under a prospect contract may be signed to a regular contract extension, but they may also be signed to a prospect extension.  Such an extension must be a 5-year deal where the annual salary is X% of their market value.

For the 20XX season, the following percentages would be used per prospect status.

20XX - 60%
20XX+1 - 50%
20XX+2 - 40%
20XX+3, n/a - 30%

This is more in line with what Dan originally brought up.

So if a star prospect comes up (ex: Heyward or Strasburg) and they're playing at a really high level at MLB, but not for long enough that their clock starts yet (still 20XX+3), and not for long enough that their market value is that high (lets say they were a late season call-up).  I can extend them to a 5-year deal at 30% of their current value, which would likely be the minimum?

That would seem to really increase the value of blue-chip prospects and high draft picks - is that what we want to do?
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline Colby

  • MLFB Founder
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Posts: 28820
  • Bonus inPoints: 27
    • :PIT-NFL:
    • :Blank:
    • :PIT-NHL:
    • :PennState:
    • :UnitedStates:
    • View Profile
Re: Extending Prospects
« Reply #24 on: April 18, 2010, 05:40:03 PM »
So if a star prospect comes up (ex: Heyward or Strasburg) and they're playing at a really high level at MLB, but not for long enough that their clock starts yet (still 20XX+3), and not for long enough that their market value is that high (lets say they were a late season call-up).  I can extend them to a 5-year deal at 30% of their current value, which would likely be the minimum?

That would seem to really increase the value of blue-chip prospects and high draft picks - is that what we want to do?

I forgot about Dan's minimum proposal.  These contracts are only legit if such salary is something like $4m/year.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Learn about :Commish: inPoints and the Invitationals.

OriolesGirl

  • Guest
Re: Extending Prospects
« Reply #25 on: April 19, 2010, 12:46:29 PM »
You would need a minimum or else I would sign prospects to cheap deals!
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Mr.TradeKing

  • Guest
Re: Extending Prospects
« Reply #26 on: April 22, 2010, 01:17:12 PM »
Evan Longoria is a prime example of this... (in real life that is)

~MTK
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

lp815

  • Guest
Re: Extending Prospects
« Reply #27 on: April 23, 2010, 12:17:57 AM »
I'd probably go a bit lower, in roughly the $2m to $3m range as the minimum.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline Colby

  • MLFB Founder
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Posts: 28820
  • Bonus inPoints: 27
    • :PIT-NFL:
    • :Blank:
    • :PIT-NHL:
    • :PennState:
    • :UnitedStates:
    • View Profile
Re: Extending Prospects
« Reply #28 on: April 23, 2010, 03:10:13 PM »
I'd probably go a bit lower, in roughly the $2m to $3m range as the minimum.

Well, these contracts are supposed to be special.  Longoria is the only one with such a low annual salary.  Anyone ready to vote on this?  FYI, this would be effective 2010-2011 off-season.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Learn about :Commish: inPoints and the Invitationals.

lp815

  • Guest
Re: Extending Prospects
« Reply #29 on: April 30, 2010, 11:44:18 PM »
I forgot about Dan's minimum proposal.  These contracts are only legit if such salary is something like $4m/year.

I'll approve of the current proposal, as long as the minimum is "something like $4m/year." :koolaid:
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

 

Forum Search


Quick Profile

 
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

* Chat Room

Refresh History
  • OUDAN: Move them where they belong in the SEC
    Today at 05:18:35 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: So is OUDAN strictly basketball now?
    Today at 05:18:43 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: OU is still technically in big 12
    Today at 05:19:25 PM
  • OUDAN: I still have a few football leagues
    Today at 05:19:26 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: Sec move won't happen till 2025
    Today at 05:19:42 PM
  • OUDAN: When the league starts they will be SEC
    Today at 05:19:44 PM
  • OUDAN: Your league so of course its ok either way
    Today at 05:20:38 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: Ik this because I currently live in y'all's rival team
    Today at 05:20:40 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: I'll be going to some UT Austin games again
    Today at 05:21:22 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: I've gone to some for baseball and one football
    Today at 05:21:39 PM
  • OUDAN: Im sorry you are going to have to watch that Crap school do anything
    Today at 05:22:11 PM
  • Daddy: Im still setting it up Dan
    Today at 05:22:37 PM
  • OUDAN: Gotcha, I trust you either way
    Today at 05:22:56 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: Honestly it's not the school I even support but it's greats sports environment
    Today at 05:24:09 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: Baseball is a great vibe. Football was fun. Basketball is next on my list
    Today at 05:24:58 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: UT ain't Crap I'll tell you that. From what I've seen and follow
    Today at 05:25:26 PM
  • OUDAN: They sure think they are the best at everything lol
    Today at 05:26:21 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: I enjoyed the games I've gone to so far
    Today at 05:26:59 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: That's mainly why I went was cuz I enjoy going to sports games
    Today at 05:28:05 PM
  • OUDAN: You gonna have to pay PJ washington in CCD the way he is playing
    Today at 05:28:13 PM
  • OUDAN: College games always have great atmospheres
    Today at 05:28:31 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: I'm kinda glad he's off books way too overpriced
    Today at 05:33:16 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: He was killing me in cap
    Today at 05:33:27 PM
  • OUDAN: He was for sure but he has been on fire in the playoffs
    Today at 05:34:06 PM
  • OUDAN: Makes it hard to just let him walk
    Today at 05:34:15 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: I guess but havta see if he's worth his extension price
    Today at 05:34:33 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: I also need cap for some guys that expire after this yr
    Today at 05:35:05 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: Hence why I haven't made a decision on him
    Today at 05:35:27 PM
  • OUDAN: fantrax loves him his extension is 27m yikes
    Today at 05:36:03 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: And why else do you think I say he's overpriced
    Today at 05:37:05 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: That's horrible cost
    Today at 05:37:13 PM
  • OUDAN: Yeah thats brutal I didnt wanna pay Mobley that lol
    Today at 05:37:27 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: Hard pass
    Today at 05:38:14 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: That price alone makes it easier to let him walk
    Today at 05:38:35 PM
  • OUDAN: lol
    Today at 05:38:36 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: I dunno what you were trying to do by telling me his performance
    Today at 05:40:18 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: But I'm gonna save my cap by letting him walk
    Today at 05:40:39 PM
  • OUDAN: Was just looking over rosters for trades and saw that
    Today at 05:40:40 PM
  • OUDAN: Definetely not trying to trade for him lol
    Today at 05:40:54 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: Yeah he was paid Abt 25 last yr
    Today at 05:41:01 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: And I was waiting for him to come of books
    Today at 05:41:16 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: He's not worth 27
    Today at 05:41:36 PM
  • OUDAN: Agreed
    Today at 05:44:05 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: I also let one more walk
    Today at 05:45:40 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: I have not signed 2 players
    Today at 05:45:54 PM
  • OUDAN: I se that
    Today at 05:50:55 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: yepp
    Today at 06:01:41 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: both on purpose
    Today at 06:01:49 PM
  • Brent: I can afford Mobley.  I'll send a 2024 1st for him.
    Today at 07:17:03 PM
  • TheGOAT: Would the NBA Live Draft be based on the actual NBA draft for the first year?
    Today at 07:48:03 PM