Author Topic: RC Decision - rule proposal  (Read 3267 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Colby

  • MLFB Founder
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Posts: 28820
  • Bonus inPoints: 27
    • :PIT-NFL:
    • :Blank:
    • :PIT-NHL:
    • :PennState:
    • :UnitedStates:
    • View Profile
RC Decision - rule proposal
« Reply #10 on: May 21, 2012, 01:15:22 PM »
Corey, see my point about NBA Futures.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Learn about :Commish: inPoints and the Invitationals.

Offline h4cheng

  • MVP
  • ****
  • Join Date: Nov 2009
  • Posts: 4198
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: RC Decision - rule proposal
« Reply #11 on: May 21, 2012, 01:20:25 PM »
Is this possible to manually edit the total points scored in a week in Fantrax? The fairest way to calculating pitching points for any team over the innings limit would be:

Adjusted Pitching Point = Total Pitching Point * 65 / Innings pitched for the week

funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Dan Wood

  • Guest
Re: RC Decision - rule proposal
« Reply #12 on: May 21, 2012, 01:28:26 PM »
ThE fact of the matter is that the rule is 65 IP... end of story. Because Fantrax has a loophole doesn't make it right. When you break a rule it is considered cheating. Now the question is what is fair punishment?
Corey, busy may be a viable excuse, but I have seen people watch over their rosters like a bird is about to hatch. Plus it isn't preposterous, I have a league that has a similar rule.
Mike if you are sitting at 60 plus innings going into Sunday, then you shouldn't be starting anyone. It's called roster management. And this is the argument as to why we are not a weekly league, BC we want to manage our line ups.
Now we have 3 suggestions... Forfeit, loss of points for an entire day, or what Colby is suggesting. Going over in innings is not an oversight when it happens every week
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline h4cheng

  • MVP
  • ****
  • Join Date: Nov 2009
  • Posts: 4198
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: RC Decision - rule proposal
« Reply #13 on: May 21, 2012, 01:36:36 PM »
Just thought of this as another way to resolve things:

Suppose a team has 60 innings pitched heading into last day, SP1 went for 6 innings, SP2 went for 7 innings and SP3 went for 3 innings on Sunday. Arrange the 3 SPs from the most innings pitched to the least innings pitched, and then bench them until the team falls below 65. In this case, SP1 and SP2 would both be benched and the team is left with 63 innings pitched.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Corey

  • Guest
Re: RC Decision - rule proposal
« Reply #14 on: May 21, 2012, 02:09:14 PM »
New Era has a hard cap. Once you hit it, fantrax stops counting points
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Dan Wood

  • Guest
Re: RC Decision - rule proposal
« Reply #15 on: May 21, 2012, 06:34:33 PM »
As long as you are under the cap at the end of scoring on Saturday, you can throw as many innings as you like on Sunday...

My proposal is this then...

50 points deducted for every inning over the limit...

Howe as per your suggestion, I don't think that will work because it will take too much time, and could be considered baby sitting.

Anyone else have suggestions I am all ears, but this is something that needs to be taken care of. As I said previously the rule is in place, and there is a very exploitable loop hole. I would like to have this taken care of by the end of this scoring period.

Thank you
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline rcankosy

  • All-Star
  • ***
  • Join Date: Oct 2009
  • Posts: 2476
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: RC Decision - rule proposal
« Reply #16 on: May 21, 2012, 06:49:13 PM »
I fully support the 65 IP rule, but I think it is too much of an imposition to ask people to calculate how many innings they have left on Sunday before the lineups lock or try to guess how many IP their starters will get on Sunday if they are under the innings limit going into the last day.  I am pretty sure that everyone on the RC knew the Fantrax limitations when we voted on the 65 IP rule, because I specifically asked the question myself on the public forum.  Therefore, I vote to leave things as is, and let Fantrax handle this as best it can without any human intervention or penalties.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Dan Wood

  • Guest
Re: RC Decision - rule proposal
« Reply #17 on: May 21, 2012, 07:02:08 PM »
1. If you are at 60 IP it's not quantum physics...
2. Why I wanted a start limit
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline h4cheng

  • MVP
  • ****
  • Join Date: Nov 2009
  • Posts: 4198
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: RC Decision - rule proposal
« Reply #18 on: May 21, 2012, 07:09:12 PM »
The loophole has been there since last year, so I don't know why we want to start using such a harsh penalty now.

Fantrax does have the capability of adjusting scoring in a given week and it looks pretty flexible. My vote is for if the IP goes over the limit, then

 penalty = Total Pitching Points for the week * (Total Innings Pitched - 65) / Total Innings Pitched.

This is the fairest solution. The penalty amount is equal to exactly the amount of scoring excess of 65 innings pitched. Dan I know it's not rocket science when a team is at 60 IP heading into the final day, but what if the team has only 50 innings pitched and 3 starters going on Sunday?
« Last Edit: May 21, 2012, 07:11:32 PM by h4cheng »
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Dan Wood

  • Guest
Re: RC Decision - rule proposal
« Reply #19 on: May 21, 2012, 07:14:44 PM »
What if a team has 12 mil to spend and there is a FA going for 10? Same principle. Just because there is a ceiling doesn't mean you have to touch it
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

 

Forum Search


Quick Profile

 
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

* Chat Room

Refresh History
  • indiansnation: [link]
    Yesterday at 01:53:56 PM
  • STLBlues91: Feel free to message I will be around for talks as I work on some spreadsheets
    Yesterday at 04:43:35 PM
  • Daddy: @Brian the city of Pittsburgh would never forgive you for trading Crosby. Let him retire in Pittsburgh.
    Yesterday at 05:58:55 PM
  • Daddy: I was looking forward to bashing you and him upside the head with these Flyers. Do not deny me that sir.
    Yesterday at 06:00:04 PM
  • Mt_Crushmore: Man, I was thinking the same for Stamkos. Nevermind, were not allowed.
    Yesterday at 06:10:06 PM
  • STLBlues91: I mean STL is a welcoming place
    Yesterday at 06:14:03 PM
  • indiansnation: Nice job with NHL live  guys
    Yesterday at 07:38:43 PM
  • Daddy: Thanks Brian. You've seen them all.
    Yesterday at 07:51:41 PM
  • Daddy: We're nearly completed.
    Yesterday at 07:55:40 PM
  • Braves155: Daddy you me & Brian gonna be at one each other a ton in hockey as I'm the Rangers in y'alls division
    Yesterday at 09:04:25 PM
  • Daddy: I must break you.
    Yesterday at 09:26:23 PM
  • STLBlues91: The guy that says that loses in the long run though...
    Yesterday at 09:39:42 PM
  • Braves155: To hell with all Philly sports teams. :rofl:   ☠️ #TRUTH
    Yesterday at 09:43:28 PM
  • Braves155: More importantly Mets suck
    Yesterday at 09:44:57 PM
  • Daddy: @Blues... Not this guy.
    Yesterday at 09:49:10 PM
  • STLBlues91: We shall see. May go fix some flyers cap hits real quick while i am at it.. They need a pay bump
    Yesterday at 09:51:07 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: quick question on nhl live
    Yesterday at 09:57:27 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: will there be a roster cleanup
    Yesterday at 09:57:44 PM
  • Daddy: What you talkin bout Willis?
    Yesterday at 09:58:35 PM
  • Daddy: Roster cleanup?
    Yesterday at 09:58:51 PM
  • Daddy: @STLBlues91 look at the NHL LIVE chat window please.
    Yesterday at 09:59:36 PM
  • STLBlues91: Going there now
    Yesterday at 10:00:09 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: didnt you mention that some players on our roster have moved
    Yesterday at 10:00:14 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: will that need to eb accounted for
    Yesterday at 10:00:22 PM
  • Daddy: @BAB as per LIVE rules... All new ownership gets free drops year one.
    Yesterday at 10:00:25 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: or are they still ours
    Yesterday at 10:00:28 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: that part i get
    Yesterday at 10:00:51 PM
  • Daddy: The rosters are set by a prior date not todays or tomorrows
    Yesterday at 10:00:53 PM
  • Daddy: If someone appears on your roster its because they are your player
    Yesterday at 10:01:21 PM
  • Daddy: Regardless of who they start the new season with.
    Yesterday at 10:01:40 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: are we allowed to post drops now or is that at a different time
    Yesterday at 10:02:42 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: last question
    Yesterday at 10:02:46 PM
  • Daddy: Only the newest NBA LIVE rosters are unknown as we will go with the newest version for the upcoming 2024/25 season.
    Yesterday at 10:02:54 PM
  • Daddy: NHL LIVE you must wait.
    Yesterday at 10:03:15 PM
  • Daddy: It doesnt start till 6/1
    Yesterday at 10:03:28 PM
  • Daddy: We just work fast ;)
    Yesterday at 10:03:45 PM
  • Daddy: Looks like its ready but the SS isnt finished and we cant do transactions till we finish.
    Yesterday at 10:04:25 PM
  • Daddy: Its not like the others. Its got NHL/AHL and formulas need perfected.
    Yesterday at 10:04:56 PM
  • Daddy: A lot of LIVE GMs came after i had won in football and built a monster in baseball. Many of you weren't there for the start. Like STLBlues. Like Braves. So you talk smack to the old Man (me).
    Yesterday at 10:09:00 PM
  • Daddy: I cannot wait to start these virgin leagues. So that (you too BAB) can get your deserved foots from day one. :)
    Yesterday at 10:10:30 PM
  • Daddy: Size 13 (lubricant included sponsored by *Acme Bigfoot Jelly Inc)
    Yesterday at 10:12:47 PM
  • Brent: I don't know Hockey, but NHL Live sounds good.  I probably shouldn't have left FGM as I have a little more time than I thought after leaving a bunch of other leagues.
    Yesterday at 10:38:24 PM
  • STLBlues91: Think there are 3 more teams left until NHL gets filled up
    Yesterday at 10:40:10 PM
  • Daddy: Four (4) NY Islanders >> Nashville Predators >> Ottawa Senators >> LA Kings
    Yesterday at 10:50:47 PM
  • Daddy: They each had owners who uncommitted two of them went to other sites to try to copy the concept. Problem is no Daddy, no staff,  no LIVE.
    Yesterday at 10:52:54 PM
  • Daddy: Nobody on Earth does hockey like we are about to do it. Its a shame 28 teams are gone without most of the true profsl hockey guys signing up. That's a huge loss. For them.
    Yesterday at 10:54:45 PM
  • Daddy: If you love hockey and you love dynasty and you arent in LIVE than you must hate me or competition more than you love the others. Which is petty & not worth our efforts anyway.
    Yesterday at 10:56:10 PM
  • Daddy: NHL LIVE Spreadsheet [link] should be available to be seen.
    Yesterday at 11:35:31 PM
  • Daddy: @Brent we sincerely hope that you do join as a HOF level dynasty GM. The rules and a lot of format carry over from one LIVE league to another.
    Yesterday at 11:56:46 PM
  • Daddy: We believe that even if you don't know a sport well, we provide the material, and enough guidance advice that any disadvantages are minimized. Hockey is one of the greatest sports of all time.
    Yesterday at 11:58:09 PM