0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Giving out repeated 10% cap penalties is brutal though.
if they run out of all 10 picks they should be replaced because 10 days to fix your roster is plenty of time
Once the first penalty is enforced (so after the 24-hour official warning notice) I think they should be given 72-hour or week long period before the next penalty is dealt. If it does happen, the person is probably not able to access a computer and the last thing we want is to open the door of special exceptions because then everyone will have an excuse they think qualifies.The other issue with this rule is that a repeat offender is probably someone who will not be with the league for long, and all we're doing is handicapping the next owner who did nothing wrong. I think we should consider that as we come up with any rule changes that affect future seasons (such as cap hits in the future or draft picks).
In that case, let's continue with the current Mariners penalty. I want to put up for RC vote the following...Roster violations are made official by a warning. Failure to respond to such a warning in 72 hours results in a penalty of losing the last draft pick in the upcoming draft. There is a five pick limit in which two or more penalties is ground for replacement (beyond our own two-week activity standards). Once a team hits the five pick limit then they will receive 10% cap hits for the current season. If such a move puts them over cap then the 10% cap hit will apply in the following season. If that puts them over a future cap, then the cap hits will move to another future years.YAY - ColbyNAY -