Opinions about ProFSL

[ldsjayhawk]

Please use this thread to share your opinions about ProFSL.  Just trying to figure out the best way to move forward with things.

In addition to your observations, please answer include answers to the following questions:

• Does having a site like ProFSL add to your playing experience? If so, what does it add?
• What do you like about the site?
• What needs improvement?

Please feel free to share any thoughts you'd like in addition to these questions

[BHows]

Once a thriving fantasy sports site it has been left to die by self inflicted wounds. Inactivity has risen and, for whatever reason, team owners are using Fantrax to communicate, build and edit trade blocks and so on.
Those features are available on ProFSL but nobody uses them. I'll even argue that trade block is easier to access than Fantrax.
Does anyone else see the irony in going to another site to complain about an inactive site when that action is the very definition of inactivity on the site they are complaining about?
I'm not naive, I know how this will end up. This time next year there will be no more ProFSL. Nothing I can do to stop it. First Flash is gone, then Papps, then all the history Daddy deleted. Now this.

I don't know that ProFSL adds to my playing experience. I know that I've tried other sites and found none to compare.
I like that the site has personality. I know most people by name.
I can't come up with anything I'd change off the top of my head but I'm willing to listen

[TheProfessor]

I enjoy having a multi-thread forum that where owners can interact, but ProFSL may not be that forum any longer.

I've operated teams that have a similar setup to this one (rosters on FT, forum on WordPress/ProBoards/etc) and they were, by and large, very positive experiences.

I think it can be a successful model, even in today's world of texting/phone based operations, vs. the "old-school" method of PC/laptop based operations. I just don't think that ProFSL is (or maybe even can be) fit for that role.