LEAGUE-WIDE VOTE- CASH EXCHANGED IN TRADES

[Billy]

Please post your vote here for which option you would rather go with.

Option A- Completely get rid of allowing cash to be paid on players in trades.

Option B- A team can have no more than a net $25m in cash paid from another team on their roster. Meaning if you have are paying say $10m in cash on player's trade away from your roster, you can not have more than $35m coming in from other teams.

[Billy]

I am voting for option A.

[OUDAN]

Option B, no payments at all seems like a bit of a rash move.

[IndianaBuc]

option A for me as well.

[Vik]

If these are only 2 options, I am voting for B.

That said, if plan is to make the change starting this offseason (which makes sense), then I think it would be fair to not penalize teams that previously made moves with cash for future seasons. My Jazz as is are over the 25m net for 2023.

[Billy]

If these are only 2 options, I am voting for B.

That said, if plan is to make the change starting this offseason (which makes sense), then I think it would be fair to not penalize teams that previously made moves with cash for future seasons. My Jazz as is are over the 25m net for 2023.

Yes, it would go into effect immediately. It just would go like the salary cap. Meaning if you started off season over the cap, every move has to be to clear some cap. Would just mean any deal involving cash on a players contract, would need to get you closer to the net $25m

[Billy]

If anyone has another option that would be good for this vote, let me know. I?m good to listen on another option. Just can?t be to keep it the same. The cash exchanged on players contracts does need to be reigned in

[jojowalkwalk]

Option A

[cloud91]

Voting for option B.
I feel option A is just like a generic fantasy league😅.

[Vik]

Yes, it would go into effect immediately. It just would go like the salary cap. Meaning if you started off season over the cap, every move has to be to clear some cap. Would just mean any deal involving cash on a players contract, would need to get you closer to the net $25m

That's fair, I am on board with this should option B pass.

If anyone has another option that would be good for this vote, let me know. I?m good to listen on another option. Just can?t be to keep it the same. The cash exchanged on players contracts does need to be reigned in

My suggestion would be to not limit overall number, but rather limit the amount on any given player. Say no more than 50% (or a lower number if preferred) on a given salary.

Player % option 1: Simply say each year of contract no more than 50% can be paid per a season. 
e.g. player on a 2 year 20m contract, max payment would be up to 10m each year 2023 and 2024.

Player % option 2: Variation to above but instead of 50% being per a season it is allowed to be spread over total contract in any way agreed up.
e.g. player on a 2 year 20m contract, max payment allowed would be 20m total. Should a team wish they can pay 20m in 2023 and zero in 2024 as 1 scenario... the 10m each season as per option 1 or any other combination of 20m is still allowed.

Again 50% can be changed, I just find it works well for other leagues (both options I have played with).

However, still no issue with the proposed option B if this makes more sense for CCD.