Discussion: Increase MiLR 40 game limit

[favo_zomg]

I'm still good with 40 games.

Of course we might have to bump up the size to 25 MiLR spots in a yr or 2. That will keep the value of draft picks up.

If we bump up the games, we will have to bump up the milr size too cause more players will be living there for a little longer.

i think the biggest issue we have is we have no two way contracts. Because of that, I think it would be a good idea to try 60/40 games so we can really see where the specs are at. I think it would help teams that are filled.

[PsychoticPondGoons]

If we bump up the games, we will have to bump up the milr size too cause more players will be living there for a little longer.

i think the biggest issue we have is we have no two way contracts. Because of that, I think it would be a good idea to try 60/40 games so we can really see where the specs are at. I think it would help teams that are filled.

:iatp:

I like the thinking.
The speedbump will be that PR didn't want to change the max games for goalies relative to skaters. Keeps tracking straight forward and one less detail for new owners to tune into.

[SlackJack]

I prefer it capped at 40 as it is. My thinking is that with less opportunity for dynasty teams to hoard young talent that improves the speed at which other teams can rebuild. Simply put, the more talent that is available in free-agency the better.

[favo_zomg]

I prefer it capped at 40 as it is. My thinking is that with less opportunity for dynasty teams to hoard young talent that improves the speed at which other teams can rebuild. Simply put, the more talent that is available in free-agency the better.

Considering how there are few free agents available, I think this line of thinking is proper for this league. Keeping the games at 40 and the milr size at 20 will force teams to make decisions that they would prefer not to make, thus adding more free agents.