Author Topic: Rule change vote #2 (Prospect extension discount reduction)  (Read 2895 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Rob

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2010
  • Posts: 19209
  • Bonus inPoints: 3
    • :NE:
    • :BOS-NBA:
    • :BOS-NHL:
    • :NewHampshire:
    • :NER:
    • :BOS:
    • View Profile
Re: Rule change vote #2 (Prospect extension discount reduction)
« Reply #40 on: August 10, 2019, 01:53:49 PM »
Just a thought.

Another way to force decisions would be to not let players sit in the minors with more than 40 games played. (If this were the case, the number could go up, maybe to 50 or 60 games played).

That way, if a good, contending team has a solid roster full of veterans, they couldn't also just keep young up and coming players sit in their minors with a season and a half worth of games played, waiting for them to earn a top role on their real NHL team and become fantasy relevant.

It would force decisions of whether to drop them or trade them, or if you think they'll really become something you'd have to bring them to your NHL roster and drop someone else.

That would hurt the rebuilding teams quite a bit.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline SlackJack

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2012
  • Posts: 5155
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
  • Director of Media Relations
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :PHI-NHL:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: Rule change vote #2 (Prospect extension discount reduction)
« Reply #41 on: August 10, 2019, 02:05:34 PM »
The best way to increase the number and quality of free agents is to reduce the salary cap. At the same time this helps re-building teams who generally have more cap to spend.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
:SC-NHL: :SC-NHL: :SC-NHL: :SC-NHL:  2015-16, 2017-18, 2018-19, 2019-20 Backyard NHL Stanley Cup Champion :STL-NHL:

Offline jlapo11

  • MVP
  • ****
  • Join Date: Sep 2012
  • Posts: 3085
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :STL-NHL:
    • :Blank:
    • :MON-MLS:
    • View Profile
Re: Rule change vote #2 (Prospect extension discount reduction)
« Reply #42 on: August 10, 2019, 03:17:25 PM »
One option to increase the number of FA could be to reduce our roster  to 27. We don't really need 30 players I think
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline WestCoastExpress

  • MVP
  • ****
  • Join Date: Oct 2016
  • Posts: 4316
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :blank:
    • View Profile
Re: Rule change vote #2 (Prospect extension discount reduction)
« Reply #43 on: August 10, 2019, 03:46:48 PM »
One option to increase the number of FA could be to reduce our roster  to 27. We don't really need 30 players I think

Hey I had a hard enough time in playoffs with a 30-man roster with like 6 injuries, haha.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline jmtrops

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2011
  • Posts: 5187
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :NE:
    • :Blank:
    • :TBL:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: Rule change vote #2 (Prospect extension discount reduction)
« Reply #44 on: August 10, 2019, 04:18:11 PM »
at this point it seems the majority are not in-favor of changing the prospect discount. It seems like although there are some rules each of us think can be improved it does not seem like anyone thinks they are dragging the league down. I plan my team years in advance and make adjustments based on the current rules and the problems they cause me in improving my team. When I joined this league I had little experience with this type of league and it takes a while to see all the nuances of this league. I guess my point is sometimes small changes in the rules can have a negative effect on the teams in the middle of the pack that its not intending to have that impact on even if we have a 1 year grace period. So if there is not a big problem then maybe there is nothing to fix. we are all used to the rules as they are and can make the needed changes in our strategy to build a winner.

It would be nice to be in a league that tries to duplicate real life NHL as close as it can but it does not exist nor would there be enough people to fill such a league with all the other leagues having trouble but DNHL is not that league and I dont think we should try to make it that way
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline SlackJack

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2012
  • Posts: 5155
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
  • Director of Media Relations
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :PHI-NHL:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: Rule change vote #2 (Prospect extension discount reduction)
« Reply #45 on: August 10, 2019, 06:57:45 PM »
at this point it seems the majority are not in-favor of changing the prospect discount. It seems like although there are some rules each of us think can be improved it does not seem like anyone thinks they are dragging the league down. I plan my team years in advance and make adjustments based on the current rules and the problems they cause me in improving my team. When I joined this league I had little experience with this type of league and it takes a while to see all the nuances of this league. I guess my point is sometimes small changes in the rules can have a negative effect on the teams in the middle of the pack that its not intending to have that impact on even if we have a 1 year grace period. So if there is not a big problem then maybe there is nothing to fix. we are all used to the rules as they are and can make the needed changes in our strategy to build a winner.

It would be nice to be in a league that tries to duplicate real life NHL as close as it can but it does not exist nor would there be enough people to fill such a league with all the other leagues having trouble but DNHL is not that league and I dont think we should try to make it that way
Sure we can put a pin in it for now but there's always room for improvement. Agree that changes should be small and incremental as rosters are built over years based on the rules of the day.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
:SC-NHL: :SC-NHL: :SC-NHL: :SC-NHL:  2015-16, 2017-18, 2018-19, 2019-20 Backyard NHL Stanley Cup Champion :STL-NHL:

Offline Rob

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2010
  • Posts: 19209
  • Bonus inPoints: 3
    • :NE:
    • :BOS-NBA:
    • :BOS-NHL:
    • :NewHampshire:
    • :NER:
    • :BOS:
    • View Profile
Re: Rule change vote #2 (Prospect extension discount reduction)
« Reply #46 on: August 10, 2019, 07:46:27 PM »
Got a whopper of an idea coming for you all to chew on. Hopefully will get it all fleshed out by tonight.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline SlackJack

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2012
  • Posts: 5155
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
  • Director of Media Relations
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :PHI-NHL:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: Rule change vote #2 (Prospect extension discount reduction)
« Reply #47 on: August 10, 2019, 09:39:42 PM »
Got a whopper of an idea coming for you all to chew on. Hopefully will get it all fleshed out by tonight.
Peg contract extensions to real-world contract values?  :rofl:
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
:SC-NHL: :SC-NHL: :SC-NHL: :SC-NHL:  2015-16, 2017-18, 2018-19, 2019-20 Backyard NHL Stanley Cup Champion :STL-NHL:

Offline WestCoastExpress

  • MVP
  • ****
  • Join Date: Oct 2016
  • Posts: 4316
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :blank:
    • View Profile
Re: Rule change vote #2 (Prospect extension discount reduction)
« Reply #48 on: August 10, 2019, 11:38:02 PM »
Peg contract extensions to real-world contract values?  :rofl:

 :iatp:

Sure, why not
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

 

Forum Search


Quick Profile

 
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

* Chat Room

Refresh History
  • Daddy: I will make it so
    Today at 05:00:42 PM
  • OUDAN: Daddy why is OU listed in the big 12?
    Today at 05:18:25 PM
  • OUDAN: Move them where they belong in the SEC
    Today at 05:18:35 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: So is OUDAN strictly basketball now?
    Today at 05:18:43 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: OU is still technically in big 12
    Today at 05:19:25 PM
  • OUDAN: I still have a few football leagues
    Today at 05:19:26 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: Sec move won't happen till 2025
    Today at 05:19:42 PM
  • OUDAN: When the league starts they will be SEC
    Today at 05:19:44 PM
  • OUDAN: Your league so of course its ok either way
    Today at 05:20:38 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: Ik this because I currently live in y'all's rival team
    Today at 05:20:40 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: I'll be going to some UT Austin games again
    Today at 05:21:22 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: I've gone to some for baseball and one football
    Today at 05:21:39 PM
  • OUDAN: Im sorry you are going to have to watch that Crap school do anything
    Today at 05:22:11 PM
  • Daddy: Im still setting it up Dan
    Today at 05:22:37 PM
  • OUDAN: Gotcha, I trust you either way
    Today at 05:22:56 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: Honestly it's not the school I even support but it's greats sports environment
    Today at 05:24:09 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: Baseball is a great vibe. Football was fun. Basketball is next on my list
    Today at 05:24:58 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: UT ain't Crap I'll tell you that. From what I've seen and follow
    Today at 05:25:26 PM
  • OUDAN: They sure think they are the best at everything lol
    Today at 05:26:21 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: I enjoyed the games I've gone to so far
    Today at 05:26:59 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: That's mainly why I went was cuz I enjoy going to sports games
    Today at 05:28:05 PM
  • OUDAN: You gonna have to pay PJ washington in CCD the way he is playing
    Today at 05:28:13 PM
  • OUDAN: College games always have great atmospheres
    Today at 05:28:31 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: I'm kinda glad he's off books way too overpriced
    Today at 05:33:16 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: He was killing me in cap
    Today at 05:33:27 PM
  • OUDAN: He was for sure but he has been on fire in the playoffs
    Today at 05:34:06 PM
  • OUDAN: Makes it hard to just let him walk
    Today at 05:34:15 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: I guess but havta see if he's worth his extension price
    Today at 05:34:33 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: I also need cap for some guys that expire after this yr
    Today at 05:35:05 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: Hence why I haven't made a decision on him
    Today at 05:35:27 PM
  • OUDAN: fantrax loves him his extension is 27m yikes
    Today at 05:36:03 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: And why else do you think I say he's overpriced
    Today at 05:37:05 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: That's horrible cost
    Today at 05:37:13 PM
  • OUDAN: Yeah thats brutal I didnt wanna pay Mobley that lol
    Today at 05:37:27 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: Hard pass
    Today at 05:38:14 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: That price alone makes it easier to let him walk
    Today at 05:38:35 PM
  • OUDAN: lol
    Today at 05:38:36 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: I dunno what you were trying to do by telling me his performance
    Today at 05:40:18 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: But I'm gonna save my cap by letting him walk
    Today at 05:40:39 PM
  • OUDAN: Was just looking over rosters for trades and saw that
    Today at 05:40:40 PM
  • OUDAN: Definetely not trying to trade for him lol
    Today at 05:40:54 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: Yeah he was paid Abt 25 last yr
    Today at 05:41:01 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: And I was waiting for him to come of books
    Today at 05:41:16 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: He's not worth 27
    Today at 05:41:36 PM
  • OUDAN: Agreed
    Today at 05:44:05 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: I also let one more walk
    Today at 05:45:40 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: I have not signed 2 players
    Today at 05:45:54 PM
  • OUDAN: I se that
    Today at 05:50:55 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: yepp
    Today at 06:01:41 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: both on purpose
    Today at 06:01:49 PM