0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Referendum on "Dynasty" aside I think the changes we're talking about are minor but worth discussing.1) Small static factor adjustment.2) Cash trading cap.3) Shorter contract extensions.Points 2 & 3 would more than offset a $20k static factor.
Referendum on "Dynasty" aside I think the changes we're talking about are minor but worth discussing.1) Small static factor adjustment.
2) Cash trading cap.
3) Shorter contract extensions.
I think that $25k per point is high if the plan is for us to rebuild with our prospects. I'll have to let most of mine walk.I think there should be a different multiplier for D than there is for LW/C/RW. Extending defensemen is really not affordable
I am good with discussing but none of these changes even if agreed upon should happen immediately. Especially changes to extension rules. They should always be delayed by a season.
I think there should be a different multiplier for D than there is for LW/C/RW. Extending defensemen is really not affordable
I'd like to hear from others on a cash trading cap. My idea would not be to restrict out-going cash as it is indeed a good trade chip for rebuilding teams. My specific idea would be to limit cash received by any one team to a total of no more than 10% of over-all cap ($9.5m) for any given year, to a maximum of $38m in any one trade. ($9.5m for 4 years).My reasoning is to keep the field competitive at the top which in turn hopefully incentivises more trades. Bottom teams will also have to drum up more trades with more partners to move their cash instead of just shunting $50m in one go.
I would pair this proposal with an initiative that all teams field an active roster of 90% regular NHL players. I'm all for active tanking but loading up with 45 non-playing prospects is an insult that we can and should avoid.
Reducing max contract duration is pretty obvious. 4 years is still a long time if the contract holds value but knocking a year off will make buying out a bad contract much easier.
a good gm has adapted to the rules we have. honestly I dont see any of these changes will make things better it will just make them different. If we are not actually solving a problem why make a change. if its not broke dont fix it
rob how much does the home team draft hurt you?