* Old Powerhouse

Atlanta Braves Baltimore Orioles Cleveland Guardians Chicago Cubs Colorado Rockies Los Angeles Angles Los Angeles Dodgers Montreal Expos New York Mets Oakland A's Philadelphia Phillies San Diego Padres Pittsburgh Pirates San Francisco Giants Tampa Bay Rays Miami Marlins Blank 
Blank Logo-2.th.png" border="0 Blank 
 RIP Cliff (1950-2023) Blank Blank Blank Blank

Author Topic: POLL: Add clarifying clause to our rules governing Prospect Extensions  (Read 2356 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Flash

  • *ProFSL Staff
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2010
  • Posts: 23232
  • Bonus inPoints: 319
    • :SFO:
    • :GS:
    • :SJ:
    • :California:
    • :UnitedStates:
    • :SF:
    • View Profile
Our rules governing Prospect Extensions are a little ambiguous at the moment.  You can review our rules as presently written at this link:

http://www.profsl.com/smf/index.php?topic=176015.msg844709#msg844709

I am offering this poll to our league members in an attempt to get some clarification for future extensions.  The clause you are voting on is utilized in Franchise GM and works quite well.  As a member of that league, everyone has a clear understanding of when the extensions will go into effect because it stipulates a particular timeline.  Our rules do not have such a stipulation, and therefore, it is subject to interpretation. 

I fully support the implementation of the rule.  No comment is required, but please offer one if you believe it helps clarify your vote.
« Last Edit: December 28, 2014, 06:25:47 PM by Flash »
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
🏆 2021 FGM World Series Champion - :SF:
🏆 2017 WCB2 World Series Champion - :SD:
🏆 2021 BSN Football Mt West Champion :UNLV:
🏆 2021 BSN Football Big 10 Champion -  :Nebraska:
🏆 2021 BSN Football Pac-12 Champion :California:

Offline Alex87878

  • All-Star
  • ***
  • Join Date: Feb 2014
  • Posts: 1422
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :NE:
    • :BOS-NBA:
    • :BOS-NHL:
    • :Northeastern:
    • View Profile
Re: Add clarifying clause to our rules governing Prospect Extensions
« Reply #1 on: December 28, 2014, 03:59:13 PM »
So this clause considers "the following season" to be 2016 and not 2015 correct, as was shown in your example with Christian Yelich?
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline Flash

  • *ProFSL Staff
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2010
  • Posts: 23232
  • Bonus inPoints: 319
    • :SFO:
    • :GS:
    • :SJ:
    • :California:
    • :UnitedStates:
    • :SF:
    • View Profile
Re: Add clarifying clause to our rules governing Prospect Extensions
« Reply #2 on: December 28, 2014, 04:08:55 PM »
So this clause considers "the following season" to be 2016 and not 2015 correct, as was shown in your example with Christian Yelich?

As it stands right now, with the rule as it is presently written, my interpretation is that 2016 would be the following year.  If this clause is adopted, then the Prospect Contract is replaced by the extension immediately because 2015 becomes the following season.

My interpretation of the present rule is based on the fact that if a player with a 2015 contract is given an extension right now, it would not cancel out the 2015 contract, it would be added onto the length of the contract--with the starting point being 2016. 
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
🏆 2021 FGM World Series Champion - :SF:
🏆 2017 WCB2 World Series Champion - :SD:
🏆 2021 BSN Football Mt West Champion :UNLV:
🏆 2021 BSN Football Big 10 Champion -  :Nebraska:
🏆 2021 BSN Football Pac-12 Champion :California:

Offline Calvin

  • MVP
  • ****
  • Join Date: Oct 2013
  • Posts: 2933
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :IND:
    • :CHI-NBA:
    • :CHI-NHL:
    • :Stanford:
    • :CHI-MLS:
    • View Profile
Re: POLL: Add clarifying clause to our rules governing Prospect Extensions
« Reply #3 on: December 28, 2014, 10:52:31 PM »
Before I vote, just wondering, what is the rule on extensions for players not on PC?
Say I have player x, and in the middle of the season, he's been hurt and he was out all last season, thus, I know he's going to be a low resign value player, and I ink him to an extension. That extension begins the following year, correct?

---
and i nthe matt carpenter extension example, if Minnesota waits till say the day after opening day, then he would be able to get this extension done for 5 yrs at that new rate + the .3 of the current year?


funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline Flash

  • *ProFSL Staff
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2010
  • Posts: 23232
  • Bonus inPoints: 319
    • :SFO:
    • :GS:
    • :SJ:
    • :California:
    • :UnitedStates:
    • :SF:
    • View Profile
Re: POLL: Add clarifying clause to our rules governing Prospect Extensions
« Reply #4 on: December 28, 2014, 11:12:16 PM »
Before I vote, just wondering, what is the rule on extensions for players not on PC?
Say I have player x, and in the middle of the season, he's been hurt and he was out all last season, thus, I know he's going to be a low resign value player, and I ink him to an extension. That extension begins the following year, correct?

---
and i nthe matt carpenter extension example, if Minnesota waits till say the day after opening day, then he would be able to get this extension done for 5 yrs at that new rate + the .3 of the current year?

In your first example, you have to consider the current year (which would be a low rank because of his injury) and the previous year (where he could be a high rank). 

Here is the rule:
"You may only extend a player's contract in their final year, however, the new contract must be no less than 50% of the current deal and will not take effect until the following season.  Teams have rights to players (whose contracts just ended) in the off-season until either the player is prematurely released or off-season FA starts. Any extension that is made, will start the next year."

In the second scenario, if the extension was given during the season it would begin the following season.  It would be a five year contract at a reduced rate of the player's current market value--with a minimum contract of $4.0m.

Our poll deals with prospect extensions given during the off-season. 
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
🏆 2021 FGM World Series Champion - :SF:
🏆 2017 WCB2 World Series Champion - :SD:
🏆 2021 BSN Football Mt West Champion :UNLV:
🏆 2021 BSN Football Big 10 Champion -  :Nebraska:
🏆 2021 BSN Football Pac-12 Champion :California:

Offline Brent

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2010
  • Posts: 15351
  • Bonus inPoints: 3
    • :NO:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :LouisianaState:
    • :UnitedStates:
    • :CHC:
    • View Profile
Re: POLL: Add clarifying clause to our rules governing Prospect Extensions
« Reply #5 on: December 28, 2014, 11:44:13 PM »
This is the norm.  The benefit of extending them early is the %, but the extension starts the following year of the current season.  So a P-2015, P-2016, P-2017 extended in 2015 would all start the new "Extension" contract in 2016.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
:SEA: 2023 Field of Dreams - League Champion
:NOP: 2022-23 Buckets of Dimes - Eastern Conference Champion
:NO: 2021-2022 NFL Live -  30-4 (4-2) 2X NFC Runner-up/1X NFC South Champs
:NO: 2018-2020 NFL Countdown - 37-11 (3-2) 1X NFC Runner Up/2X NFC South Champs
8 ProFSL Hosted League Championships 2010-2019
Proud Member of the Who Dat Nation!

Offline Flash

  • *ProFSL Staff
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2010
  • Posts: 23232
  • Bonus inPoints: 319
    • :SFO:
    • :GS:
    • :SJ:
    • :California:
    • :UnitedStates:
    • :SF:
    • View Profile
Re: POLL: Add clarifying clause to our rules governing Prospect Extensions
« Reply #6 on: January 05, 2015, 03:24:59 AM »
 "No matter what the current prospect contract is, the prospect extension kicks in the following year at the rate based on when the contract is given."

This will be added to our Rules regarding Prospect Extensions.

Thanks to all who voted. :toth:
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
🏆 2021 FGM World Series Champion - :SF:
🏆 2017 WCB2 World Series Champion - :SD:
🏆 2021 BSN Football Mt West Champion :UNLV:
🏆 2021 BSN Football Big 10 Champion -  :Nebraska:
🏆 2021 BSN Football Pac-12 Champion :California:

 

Forum Search


Quick Profile

 
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

* Chat Room

Refresh History
  • Braves155: Who wanna talk deals?
    Yesterday at 10:47:10 AM
  • IndianaBuc: Braves155 PM
    Yesterday at 11:16:47 AM
  • Braves155: Responded
    Yesterday at 11:17:23 AM
  • indiansnation: Braves155 pm
    Yesterday at 12:39:44 PM
  • Braves155: Responded indians
    Yesterday at 12:43:07 PM
  • dbreer23: Cubs are dealing in FGM, hit me up
    Yesterday at 12:59:38 PM
  • Braves155: Looking for an OF in FGM. IN Armchair looking to re-tool/rebuild a bit. Snell and others could be avail
    Yesterday at 01:09:11 PM
  • Braves155: PM Davew
    Yesterday at 01:23:10 PM
  • dbreer23: Brian CLE PM
    Yesterday at 01:49:57 PM
  • Braves155: PM BAB
    Yesterday at 03:29:20 PM
  • indiansnation: Bayareaballers pm trade posted in fgm
    Yesterday at 03:56:17 PM
  • indiansnation: Braves ill send u message soon
    Yesterday at 03:56:32 PM
  • indiansnation: Dbreer23 pm
    Yesterday at 03:58:46 PM
  • indiansnation: Braves155 pm
    Yesterday at 04:35:11 PM
  • indiansnation: Watching boston kick the living crap out of cardinals
    Yesterday at 04:53:49 PM
  • Braves155: Great seeing the Knicks get schooled
    Yesterday at 06:37:35 PM
  • Rhino7: I agree, pacers will be a better match vs Celtics
    Yesterday at 07:02:21 PM
  • Braves155: But just like anytime Stephen A. gets hyped for the Knicks, they disappear in big games
    Yesterday at 07:08:00 PM
  • TheGOAT: Celtics would probably win it all
    Yesterday at 07:20:01 PM
  • Braves155: Looking forward to TWolves-Nuggets tonight
    Yesterday at 07:22:40 PM
  • TheGOAT: Around for trade talks in NFL Live
    Yesterday at 08:07:18 PM
  • Braves155: Likewise
    Yesterday at 08:22:40 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: What you looking for? @Thegoat?
    Yesterday at 11:01:43 PM
  • Rhino7: Down goes the Champs! Nuggs out
    Yesterday at 11:56:44 PM
  • Daddy: That Minnesota NBA LIVE team aint lookin too bad right now. Should be fun!
    Today at 12:00:46 AM
  • Rhino7: Good team except the contracts
    Today at 03:09:09 PM
  • Daddy: Youve seen them? We havent completely structured all that yet. Weve got expansion and other factors that the real Wolves dont face.
    Today at 03:39:40 PM
  • Daddy: My comment on the real Wolves are if they win a chip then there is no such things as bad contracts. The point of all contracts are to win Championships.
    Today at 03:40:57 PM
  • STLBlues91: I will be around the rest of the day to talk deals. Tomorrow I will be around after work but plan on being in some spreadsheets most the day
    Today at 05:04:22 PM
  • Rhino7: No, haven’t seen them except on spotrac
    Today at 05:33:13 PM
  • Daddy: @Rhino7 the rumor is they've got a decent GM in both leagues. Especially NBA LIVE. (Howwwwwwwl)
    Today at 07:13:40 PM
  • STLBlues91: Well Vegas is ready to grab one of the players on the roster
    Today at 07:17:34 PM
  • Daddy: Lol, Seattle too Im sure.:rofl:
    Today at 07:43:10 PM
  • Daddy: I will leak this... Each team will be allowed to protect 5 and each team can only lose one player to expansion
    Today at 07:44:21 PM
  • Daddy: 30 teams to draw from = 15 players each
    Today at 07:44:57 PM
  • STLBlues91: Id also imagine trading and all that can happen. Like pick a guy to trade to another team to pick up other assets
    Today at 07:45:25 PM
  • Daddy: You know LIVE rules. Once they are yours you can do whatever you like.
    Today at 07:46:32 PM
  • STLBlues91: Yeah had to just check. So a deadline to select the keepers. Then a few days for the selection. Me and Seattle alternate picks?
    Today at 07:47:47 PM
  • Daddy: The expansion draft is LIVE alternating picks until both teams have 15 players like the NBA All Star teams get picked.
    Today at 07:48:04 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: oh Crap
    Today at 07:49:27 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: this is interesting w my team
    Today at 07:49:42 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: who to protect outside the obvious
    Today at 07:49:52 PM
  • STLBlues91: Sounds good I didnt know if it would be like the NHL expansion with seattle where they get posted or live broadcasting
    Today at 07:50:02 PM
  • Daddy: The "Expansion draft" will be a LIVE Event & followed by the Entry Draft where Vegas/Seattle also will start off with picks #1 & #2.
    Today at 07:50:06 PM
  • Daddy: We doing BIG Crap with this basketball league. Buckle up!
    Today at 07:50:46 PM
  • Daddy: NBA LIVE is codenamed "The "Matrix" for all the numbers we running. Its currently being built.
    Today at 07:52:40 PM
  • STLBlues91: Well I will get my roster breakdown before the live expansion since I am done working for the summer next Wednesday
    Today at 08:01:38 PM
  • Daddy: NHL LIVE will drop first. Hockey guys trade like crazy. Good luck. :)
    Today at 08:12:04 PM
  • STLBlues91: Yeah working on that spreadsheet and a few fixes on it. May do some slight visual adds and then to NCAA football sheet which I got going as well
    Today at 08:48:21 PM
  • Daddy: :toth: the best moderator team on the planet. Thanks! :toth:
    Today at 09:14:11 PM