11
Dynasty NHL / Re: Official Q&A Thread
« on: April 27, 2024, 03:24:38 PM »
Where do we find flex-waivers again? I can never find them.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to. 11
Dynasty NHL / Re: Official Q&A Thread« on: April 27, 2024, 03:24:38 PM »
Where do we find flex-waivers again? I can never find them.
12
Dynasty NHL / Re: Extension cost discussion« on: April 25, 2024, 10:10:31 PM »
Referendum on "Dynasty" aside I think the changes we're talking about are minor but worth discussing.
1) Small static factor adjustment. 2) Cash trading cap. 3) Shorter contract extensions. Points 2 & 3 would more than offset a $20k static factor. 13
Dynasty NHL / Re: Extension cost discussion« on: April 24, 2024, 06:54:32 PM »I pulled this out of the Q&A thread since it's as good a time as any to have this discussion. It's been a couple years using this method - how does everyone feel about it?Appreciate the discussion. $20k would be the kind if tweak I'm talking about. May not seem like much but I feel the pendulum swung a bit hard with the initial change and that $20k would be slightly less punative to GM's that draft well. If anything we need a bit less dynasty and bit more more turnover of players year to year. I pretty much support anything that pushes more players into free agency. Might need to change the league name then no? Seriously I think there are other ways to encourage more turn-over. A cap on trading cash for example. Would like to hear more about your idea for extensions even if radical. I attribute the stagnant trade market the last two years with the top teams being just so dominant that there weren't 2-3 trades that would put a team into contention. Maybe that will change this upcoming year. I would agree in part, but trading to contend immediately isn't the only reason to trade. Rebuilding teams could and should be looking ahead at least a couple of years. My opinion recently has been to reduce the number of years of prospect extensions down to 3 years. This will allow for more players to be making full scale money faster which would push more players into FA and probably increase trading. I think you're right about this but don't like moves to be too radical so I would lean towards 4 years if this gets any traction. In fact it might be worthwhile discussing the same at the top end. Getting saddled with a giant 5 year contract is quite an albatross. If more churn is the goal then a max term of 4 years is yet another way to generate it. 14
Dynasty NHL / Extension cost discussion« on: April 24, 2024, 06:56:10 AM »if anyone thinks that the calculating numbers need to be adjusted they can always start that discussion. $25k is an arbitrary number designed to improve free-agency options and accelerate improvement of lower tier teams. The trade-off is that teams are less able to retain talent. (No Dynasty for you!) The second-order effect is a sluggish trade environment. Prospect contracts are more valuable than salaried point producers. I support the intention of the change but have always argued against the the mechanics. I see a time where others will join me in calling for tweaking the static multiplier slightly lower. 15
Dynasty NHL / Re: Official Trade Block/Negotiations Thread« on: April 23, 2024, 08:17:14 PM »
Tristan Jarry
16
Dynasty NHL / Re: Official Trade Block/Negotiations Thread« on: April 19, 2024, 11:27:50 PM »
All of Arizona's expiring contracts are up for grabs. Most will get bid up in free-agency. If this is your year to make a serious run make me a pick and prospect pitch.
18
Dynasty NHL: Processed on Fantrax / Buy-out« on: April 18, 2024, 12:14:08 AM »
Darnell Nurse $6.4 * 4 = $25.6 * .66 = $17m
All this year 19
Dynasty NHL: Processed on Fantrax / Buy-out« on: April 17, 2024, 07:07:00 AM »
Brent Burns all this year at $10m
20
Dynasty NHL: Processed on Fantrax / Re: Michael Kesselring« on: January 31, 2024, 09:42:12 PM »
2 x $900k
|
|