Dynasty NHL

Home :: Fantrax :: Rules :: Transactions :: History



::
::

Author Topic: Buffalo / Edmonton  (Read 528 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline jlapo11

  • MVP
  • ****
  • Join Date: Sep 2012
  • Posts: 3085
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :STL-NHL:
    • :Blank:
    • :MON-MLS:
    • View Profile
Buffalo / Edmonton
« on: August 01, 2019, 11:18:28 PM »
:BUF-NHL: trades

G Curtis McElhinney, $2.5m (2020-2021)

for

:EDM:

D Dante Fabbro, $0.5m (P-n/a)
C Ty Dellandrea, $m (P-n/a)

I tried to acquire Adam Fox but :VAN: beat me.  fabbro was my second choice

I am trading a goalie who might not see too many games with Vasileski in front of him to acquire 2 1st round prospects with great future.  I might lost some PPG this year but I have 3 goalie prospects who should be on my NHL roster very soon (Shesterkin and Luukkonen). These two acquisitions will replace draft picks traded previously and will certainly be better that the Suppl Draft 2nd round picks.

Thanks :EDM: for the deal. I would prefer to have Fox but Fabbro and Dellandrea will do the job. Pls confirms
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline curtmenefee47

  • All-Star
  • ***
  • Join Date: Feb 2019
  • Posts: 1365
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
  • Newbie
    • :IND:
    • :BOS-NBA:
    • :BOS-NHL:
    • :GeorgiaTech:
    • View Profile
Re: Buffalo / Edmonton
« Reply #1 on: August 02, 2019, 01:48:03 AM »
Edmonton accepts.  We gain another solid backup goalie. And clear up another roster spot.  While we are trading away a lot of prospects we still have some exciting young talent on the way and are in a position to acquire some great players in free agency.  Thanks for the trade.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline SlackJack

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2012
  • Posts: 5155
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
  • Director of Media Relations
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :PHI-NHL:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: Buffalo / Edmonton
« Reply #2 on: August 02, 2019, 09:32:33 AM »
I don't like for this trade for Edmonton at all. A 36 year-old back-up for Fabbro alone would be lop-sided in Buffalo's favour. Fabbro isn't just a 1st round prospect, he's ready for prime time now. Throw in 13th over-all Ty Dellandrea and this deal seems tilted to me.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
:SC-NHL: :SC-NHL: :SC-NHL: :SC-NHL:  2015-16, 2017-18, 2018-19, 2019-20 Backyard NHL Stanley Cup Champion :STL-NHL:

Offline WestCoastExpress

  • MVP
  • ****
  • Join Date: Oct 2016
  • Posts: 4316
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :blank:
    • View Profile
Re: Buffalo / Edmonton
« Reply #3 on: August 02, 2019, 03:24:03 PM »
I don't like for this trade for Edmonton at all. A 36 year-old back-up for Fabbro alone would be lop-sided in Buffalo's favour. Fabbro isn't just a 1st round prospect, he's ready for prime time now. Throw in 13th over-all Ty Dellandrea and this deal seems tilted to me.

I'm very much with Slack on this one. Sure Mac is going to Tampa, but it's Vasi's net, so short of him getting injured, there isn't much production there.

I think Curt may be undervaluing Fabbro here too (by a lot), as he will be stepping into PK Subban's top-4 role in Nashville. Ty on top of it is just very much a bad move IMO.

I think packaging Fabbro with Dellandrea and some other pieces could net a legit starting goalie from someone. Not a 36 year old journeyman backup.

(And there is no way I'd trade Fox for McElhinney, let alone Fox plus other pieces, same as I wouldn't trade Fabbro for Mac.)
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline Rob

  • League Moderator
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2010
  • Posts: 19209
  • Bonus inPoints: 3
    • :NE:
    • :BOS-NBA:
    • :BOS-NHL:
    • :NewHampshire:
    • :NER:
    • :BOS:
    • View Profile
Re: Buffalo / Edmonton
« Reply #4 on: August 02, 2019, 03:48:18 PM »
I'm with these guys.  Seems to me these 2 prospects could pull in a hell of a lot more.

I'm inclined to veto.  Curt - convince me!
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline curtmenefee47

  • All-Star
  • ***
  • Join Date: Feb 2019
  • Posts: 1365
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
  • Newbie
    • :IND:
    • :BOS-NBA:
    • :BOS-NHL:
    • :GeorgiaTech:
    • View Profile
Re: Buffalo / Edmonton
« Reply #5 on: August 03, 2019, 10:42:49 AM »
My idea with this move was to create some space to make some bigger FA signings and solidify some starts at goalie. Sure Mcelhinney is older but he has been a decent goalie for a while and should be in a good position as a vet backup in tampa.  There aren't many goalie starts available in FA.  I'll admit that valuing prospects isn't my strength, but my play is more for this season. ( I understand the questions about dealing Fabbro), but it may be a few years before dellandrea gets solid ice time.  I think I was able to get what I wanted from the deal, I might not have maxed the return I could have gotten, but for what was offered tome I think I got something that fits with the moves I'm trying to make now. 
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline norrya66

  • MVP
  • ****
  • Join Date: Feb 2012
  • Posts: 3292
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :DET-NFL:
    • :Blank:
    • :WAS-NHL:
    • :PennState:
    • View Profile
Re: Buffalo / Edmonton
« Reply #6 on: August 03, 2019, 10:46:35 AM »
 :veto:

I understand the need for goalie starts, but two above average prospects for 25 starts tops is no where near close to me.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
:win:  2013-14 NHL Casino Champion

Offline jlapo11

  • MVP
  • ****
  • Join Date: Sep 2012
  • Posts: 3085
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :STL-NHL:
    • :Blank:
    • :MON-MLS:
    • View Profile
Re: Buffalo / Edmonton
« Reply #7 on: August 04, 2019, 08:07:56 AM »
I am out of town with limited/ no  easy access to Internet.  Stop the discussion until I can defend  this trade  and IF NECESSARY revisit  it to  make TC  members happy  even tough the two  parties involved with it were happy and approved this deal. Both add good reasons To do it.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline SlackJack

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2012
  • Posts: 5155
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
  • Director of Media Relations
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :PHI-NHL:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: Buffalo / Edmonton
« Reply #8 on: August 04, 2019, 11:56:25 AM »
 :veto:
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
:SC-NHL: :SC-NHL: :SC-NHL: :SC-NHL:  2015-16, 2017-18, 2018-19, 2019-20 Backyard NHL Stanley Cup Champion :STL-NHL:

Offline WestCoastExpress

  • MVP
  • ****
  • Join Date: Oct 2016
  • Posts: 4316
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :blank:
    • View Profile
Re: Buffalo / Edmonton
« Reply #9 on: August 04, 2019, 07:43:14 PM »
Still a veto for me.

If EDM's sole reason is to make roster space for FA, some easy moves would be to buy-out the following players who are overpaid and expiring, so it would both clear roster space and save cap as all are expiring deals:

D Johnny Boychuk, $3.8m (2019-2020)
D Danny Dekeyser, $2m (2019-2020)
G Mike Condon, $4.2m (2019-2020)


While Dellandrea may not be in the NHL this year, that's what our minors roster spots are for. With no draft picks, he can stay on the minors roster no problem, very easy to let him marinate down there.

Overall this trade doesn't even clear a roster spot as McIlhenny would take Fabbro's NHL Roster spot. And add cap space.

The value isn't close, and the reasoning doesn't make sense on top of that. As mentioned previously, packaging Fabbro and Dellandrea along with maybe another piece or two, could land a starting goalie, not a back-up who will be out of the league soon.

 :veto:
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

 

Forum Search


Quick Profile

 
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

* Chat Room

Refresh History
  • Daddy: @Brent i dig it
    Yesterday at 11:05:39 PM
  • Daddy: Whoever takes over that expansion gets to name the team.
    Yesterday at 11:07:01 PM
  • Daddy: Probably four years before the actual NBA does it. To hell with 2028.
    Yesterday at 11:07:53 PM
  • Braves155: Las Vegas Gold Diggers
    Yesterday at 11:08:26 PM
  • Daddy: I dig it
    Yesterday at 11:10:25 PM
  • Bigdon: I am chicago right
    Yesterday at 11:29:29 PM
  • Daddy: Sign up Bigdon. Chicago is gone already.
    Yesterday at 11:36:50 PM
  • Daddy: NBA LIVE [link] Pre-reserved sign up
    Yesterday at 11:37:29 PM
  • STLBlues91: Ill switch for Vegas if he wants the bulls
    Yesterday at 11:39:17 PM
  • Daddy: Sounds good
    Yesterday at 11:43:59 PM
  • Daddy: I knew Vegas would be tempting :rofl:
    Yesterday at 11:44:25 PM
  • Daddy: He still needs to select NCAA
    Yesterday at 11:44:40 PM
  • Daddy: You get to name them sir. NBA LIVE will start with an expansion draft, followed by the rookie draft.
    Yesterday at 11:45:39 PM
  • Daddy: Vegas will get the #1 pick :toast:
    Yesterday at 11:46:07 PM
  • Daddy: Super Sonics #2 pick (insert eye emoji)
    Yesterday at 11:46:44 PM
  • Daddy: All subject to trade before the draft of course.
    Yesterday at 11:47:03 PM
  • Brent: With an expansion draft, does that mean we select x number of players on our roster to protect?
    Yesterday at 11:47:51 PM
  • Brent: Also, I might have missed it, but will it be a H2H cats or points league?
    Yesterday at 11:48:39 PM
  • Daddy: @Brent yes & @Brent CATs
    Yesterday at 11:49:36 PM
  • Daddy: It will all be in the handbook as per usual.
    Yesterday at 11:50:04 PM
  • Daddy: Think MLB LIVE hoop style only not quite as deep scoring in basketball.
    Yesterday at 11:51:08 PM
  • Daddy: We are trying something thats never been done to our knowledge.
    Yesterday at 11:53:06 PM
  • Brent: I like it.
    Yesterday at 11:54:07 PM
  • Daddy: No other basketball league in the world has a Vegas NBA team. Till tonight.
    Yesterday at 11:54:13 PM
  • Daddy: I thought you might. :)
    Yesterday at 11:54:45 PM
  • STLBlues91: Yeah got to figure a solid name out for it
    Yesterday at 11:55:35 PM
  • Daddy: Had a few good suggestions. Just dont be corny.. this represents all of us.
    Yesterday at 11:57:03 PM
  • Daddy: We are the first to give Vegas a suggestion. Lets let it be a good one. Make them take notice.
    Yesterday at 11:57:48 PM
  • STLBlues91: Yeah will research it a bit
    Yesterday at 11:57:58 PM
  • Daddy: One of the NHL signup sheets has 68k views? Thats ridiculous. Where all these people at? We should have 20k leagues.
    Today at 12:00:38 AM
  • Rhino7: I used to use Las Vegas Vipers as a team name
    Today at 12:04:13 AM
  • Daddy: NHL & NCAA have 100k views on the bullpen. Nobody ever looked at that thing. There should be a few more new accounts no? I mean what they looking for. Its a sign up sheet.
    Today at 12:04:17 AM
  • Daddy: Vipers works for me if it does you. Kinda goes with the logo i gave them.
    Today at 12:05:04 AM
  • STLBlues91: Yeah writing down the names sent out and adding a few I find/think of like Las Vegas Legacy and then will narrow them down
    Today at 12:06:47 AM
  • RyanJames5: Can I take the Sonics?
    Today at 12:07:14 AM
  • Brent: Vipers is cool.
    Today at 12:08:08 AM
  • Daddy: Yes sir
    Today at 12:08:19 AM
  • Daddy: I will tentatively put the Vipers until we launch fantrax
    Today at 12:08:59 AM
  • RyanJames5: Very fun idea to expand.
    Today at 12:09:36 AM
  • Daddy: Indeed sir, indeed. What College RJ?
    Today at 12:10:11 AM
  • RyanJames5: Gonzaga
    Today at 12:13:00 AM
  • Daddy: Roger that Zags
    Today at 12:14:13 AM
  • BayAreaBallers: im excited for this a properly run nba dynasty from scratch
    Today at 12:15:51 AM
  • RyanJames5: Thank you sir
    Today at 12:15:59 AM
  • BayAreaBallers: this is my first LIVE that i sstarted from beginning and didnt take over
    Today at 12:16:16 AM
  • BayAreaBallers: NHL and NBA excited to start those from scratch
    Today at 12:16:59 AM
  • Daddy: All the leagues are well run, we just have different ideas.
    Today at 12:17:35 AM
  • Daddy: There is nothing like virgin teams that nobody else has been into. You get to inherit todays rosters. Then take them into the future.
    Today at 12:18:36 AM
  • Daddy: Usually taking over a team is inheriting someones mess which is why it was open. In startup leagues that isnt an issue.
    Today at 12:19:25 AM
  • Daddy: I forgot to text Brian. :doh:
    Today at 12:21:02 AM