Author Topic: IP Hard Cap  (Read 2196 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline bap9

  • MVP
  • ****
  • Join Date: Nov 2010
  • Posts: 3434
  • Bonus inPoints: 1003
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
IP Hard Cap
« on: December 30, 2012, 12:49:15 PM »
I am a new member to this league and as such should probably keep my mouth shut; however, I have always believed that if you disagree with something you should say so.

I would be very curious to know how many of the 30 GM’s in this league agree with a 65 IP Hard Cap with penalties for violations.

I have not seen a Hard Cap IP in all the fantasy baseball I have played .  With rare exceptions even the Cap on Games Started is usually Soft as well.

Nobody has any idea of the number of innings that pitchers will throw on Sunday,
you could be at 55 IP after Sat, use 1 SP and 1 RP and exceed the limit (a complete game and a 4 out relief stint)

I see no purpose for a Hard Cap other than making it a Hitters league. If GM’s want a real Hitters league, change the roster.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline MillerTime

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2009
  • Posts: 7697
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :PHI-NFL:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: IP Hard Cap
« Reply #1 on: December 30, 2012, 01:29:42 PM »
No problem with the cap as it is.  a few more innings would not hurt.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Maybe, just once, someone will call me 'Sir' without adding, 'You're making a scene.' - Homer Simpson

Offline h4cheng

  • MVP
  • ****
  • Join Date: Nov 2009
  • Posts: 4198
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: IP Hard Cap
« Reply #2 on: December 30, 2012, 02:27:46 PM »
The 65IP/8GS limit is the same as MB.

I dont think we've discussion repercussions for exceeding the limit. The reason hard cap is used is because Fantrax doesn't allow for soft cap.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline bap9

  • MVP
  • ****
  • Join Date: Nov 2010
  • Posts: 3434
  • Bonus inPoints: 1003
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: IP Hard Cap
« Reply #3 on: December 30, 2012, 02:52:08 PM »
Fantrax uses a soft cap
on IP and/or Games Started

That is what is used in Money Ball, New Era, DME, FBF
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline rcankosy

  • All-Star
  • ***
  • Join Date: Oct 2009
  • Posts: 2467
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: IP Hard Cap
« Reply #4 on: December 30, 2012, 03:50:08 PM »
Please see the post below for the RC's decision on this matter.

http://www.profsl.com/smf/index.php?topic=60149.0
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline h4cheng

  • MVP
  • ****
  • Join Date: Nov 2009
  • Posts: 4198
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: IP Hard Cap
« Reply #5 on: December 30, 2012, 03:52:55 PM »
Roy, I don't think we agreed to the 3 strike rule for the upcoming season.

If I remember correctly, we decided to implement a GS/IP cap and manually adjust points if teams go over these caps.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline rcankosy

  • All-Star
  • ***
  • Join Date: Oct 2009
  • Posts: 2467
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: IP Hard Cap
« Reply #6 on: December 30, 2012, 04:15:15 PM »
Roy, I don't think we agreed to the 3 strike rule for the upcoming season.

If I remember correctly, we decided to implement a GS/IP cap and manually adjust points if teams go over these caps.

Please forward the post that states the above, because all I recall is putting the 65 IP rule to a re-vote due to complaints late in the year.  I have no recollection about changes to the hard cap or penalties associated with breaking the new IP/GS rule (see post below).

http://www.profsl.com/smf/index.php?topic=73469.0
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline bap9

  • MVP
  • ****
  • Join Date: Nov 2010
  • Posts: 3434
  • Bonus inPoints: 1003
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: IP Hard Cap
« Reply #7 on: December 30, 2012, 05:51:42 PM »
Last year Moneyball used a soft cap of 75 IP and 9 GS on Fantrax
and New Era used a soft cap of 80 IP and 10 GS
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline h4cheng

  • MVP
  • ****
  • Join Date: Nov 2009
  • Posts: 4198
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: IP Hard Cap
« Reply #8 on: April 08, 2013, 01:08:01 PM »
Rangers went over the # of games started in Week 1 : it turns out no maximum has been set. This has been correctly for week 1. Roy, if you are ok with it I am going to retroactively bench a couple of your starters in week 1.

« Last Edit: April 08, 2013, 05:47:41 PM by rcankosy »
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline rcankosy

  • All-Star
  • ***
  • Join Date: Oct 2009
  • Posts: 2467
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: IP Hard Cap
« Reply #9 on: April 08, 2013, 05:47:53 PM »
Rangers went over the # of games started in Week 1 : it turns out no maximum has been set. This has been correctly for week 1. Roy, if you are ok with it I am going to retroactively bench a couple of your starters in week 1.

I went over by 2 GS.  You can bench the last 2 starts I had for the period, and they were Axelrod and Colon on Saturday.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

 

Forum Search


Quick Profile

 
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

* Chat Room

Refresh History
  • Daddy: There is actually more than 30. Expansion must be on the horizon.
    Today at 09:59:49 PM
  • Daddy: Isnt the NBA going back to Seattle?
    Today at 10:00:20 PM
  • IndianaBuc: That would be awesome
    Today at 10:02:32 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: i dunno abt that
    Today at 10:15:22 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: but an expansion is deff up there
    Today at 10:15:33 PM
  • Daddy: Seattle is getting the Sonics back I think
    Today at 10:16:02 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: [link]
    Today at 10:16:14 PM
  • Daddy: I think two more teams are coming 32 teams total
    Today at 10:16:26 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: that link ^ talks abt expansion
    Today at 10:16:49 PM
  • Daddy: Yeah Vegas is getting one
    Today at 10:17:01 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: not anytime soon
    Today at 10:17:01 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: prolly in another 3 4 yrs
    Today at 10:17:16 PM
  • Daddy: Vegas is getting everything by the time its said and done.
    Today at 10:17:23 PM
  • Daddy: If there is demand we will expand ourselves. To hell with waiting for the NBA. We can put franchises in Vegas & Seattle and have a 32 team league.
    Today at 10:18:34 PM
  • Daddy: The Vegas GM can pick his own team name
    Today at 10:18:50 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: its already getting an mlb team now
    Today at 10:18:50 PM
  • Daddy: So shall it be
    Today at 10:18:59 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: so thats 3/4 major sports
    Today at 10:19:00 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: mlb nhl and nfl
    Today at 10:19:04 PM
  • Daddy: Im opening up the Seattle Super Sonics! Lol...we bout to shake Crap up.
    Today at 10:19:51 PM
  • Daddy: The Vegas Powerballs? We need to come up with something that makes the city of Vegas say hmmmm. I bet we can.
    Today at 10:22:11 PM
  • Daddy: The Las Vegas Ignite (i dig this)
    Today at 10:30:51 PM
  • Brent: The Las Vegas Gamblers
    Today at 10:49:05 PM
  • STLBlues91: If  someone wants chicago I dont mind taking over Las Vegas as well
    Today at 10:49:06 PM
  • Daddy: Its going to be fun having the two expansion teams. It will also balance out the league a bit more
    Today at 11:04:43 PM
  • Daddy: @Brent i dig it
    Today at 11:05:39 PM
  • Daddy: Whoever takes over that expansion gets to name the team.
    Today at 11:07:01 PM
  • Daddy: Probably four years before the actual NBA does it. To hell with 2028.
    Today at 11:07:53 PM
  • Braves155: Las Vegas Gold Diggers
    Today at 11:08:26 PM
  • Daddy: I dig it
    Today at 11:10:25 PM
  • Bigdon: I am chicago right
    Today at 11:29:29 PM
  • Daddy: Sign up Bigdon. Chicago is gone already.
    Today at 11:36:50 PM
  • Daddy: NBA LIVE [link] Pre-reserved sign up
    Today at 11:37:29 PM
  • STLBlues91: Ill switch for Vegas if he wants the bulls
    Today at 11:39:17 PM
  • Daddy: Sounds good
    Today at 11:43:59 PM
  • Daddy: I knew Vegas would be tempting :rofl:
    Today at 11:44:25 PM
  • Daddy: He still needs to select NCAA
    Today at 11:44:40 PM
  • Daddy: You get to name them sir. NBA LIVE will start with an expansion draft, followed by the rookie draft.
    Today at 11:45:39 PM
  • Daddy: Vegas will get the #1 pick :toast:
    Today at 11:46:07 PM
  • Daddy: Super Sonics #2 pick (insert eye emoji)
    Today at 11:46:44 PM
  • Daddy: All subject to trade before the draft of course.
    Today at 11:47:03 PM
  • Brent: With an expansion draft, does that mean we select x number of players on our roster to protect?
    Today at 11:47:51 PM
  • Brent: Also, I might have missed it, but will it be a H2H cats or points league?
    Today at 11:48:39 PM
  • Daddy: @Brent yes & @Brent CATs
    Today at 11:49:36 PM
  • Daddy: It will all be in the handbook as per usual.
    Today at 11:50:04 PM
  • Daddy: Think MLB LIVE hoop style only not quite as deep scoring in basketball.
    Today at 11:51:08 PM
  • Daddy: We are trying something thats never been done to our knowledge.
    Today at 11:53:06 PM
  • Brent: I like it.
    Today at 11:54:07 PM
  • Daddy: No other basketball league in the world has a Vegas NBA team. Till tonight.
    Today at 11:54:13 PM
  • Daddy: I thought you might. :)
    Today at 11:54:45 PM