Author Topic: Proposed trade rule changes.  (Read 512 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Fitzy1962

  • MVP
  • ****
  • Join Date: Aug 2012
  • Posts: 4355
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :DAL:
    • :BOS-NBA:
    • :BOS-NHL:
    • :Texas:
    • View Profile
Proposed trade rule changes.
« on: October 06, 2015, 03:31:15 AM »
Hello All,

I think it's about time this league lives up to it's billing of emulating Major League Baseball.

Year after year, other team's trades get veto'd and $hit on, while the self-appointed trade police pass each other's trades with flying colors...not a coincidence at all.

They all vote to allow their own trades and $hit all over everyone else's deals. Let's not even go into the most farcical trade ever allowed in any league, in which entire teams, minor league rosters, international monies, millions of cap-dollars and entire rosters and all draft-picks of every team in the trade, were exchanged, Somehow, it was allowed to happen.

And those same people $hit all over eeeeeeevery little detail of everyone else's trades, which have been posted by anyone else, ever since then. What an insult that it's allowed to happen year after year.

Ever since "YahooLando" left, the league has turned into an aristocracy. The rich get richer and everyone else is only here to fill in the league roster. Very few people want to wait years to develop a team they way they want to and without trades, all there is is the draft and free agency, which is limited to a few quality players before the season and not much else once the season begins.

No coincidence that most of the new team managers added each year after veteran owners leave, are rookies on the website. Better that they don't understand what should and should not be allowed.

It's a joke. "Yahoo" designed an awesome format, but since he's left, it's been run downhill ever since, by a small group of people who decide all the trades to their own satisfaction and not those trying to improve their teams in their own way.

Year after year, it gets worse and worse, outright and blatant manipulation, changing the scoring and the rules and dumping on other's trades, to fit personal agendas.

There are plenty of good and honest people who still play in this league, and a bunch of others who have come and gone. But there is a certain "click" in this league, who stick together and approve all their own trades and veto everyone else's, backed up by their own factual opinion.

In a league this big, there shouldn't be a small group who have so much influence on other people's teams. And every year it get's worse. Maybe no one else has the balls to say it, but I do. 

Let people manage their own teams as they wish. There are very few trades which, if allowed, would alter the "integrity of the league" or upset the balance of it.

Any veto must provide a detailed, factually based basis for that veto.  Reasons for a veto would include but are not limited to factors such as statistical comparison, contract status, age, injury history, talent level, organizational makeup, past trade history, and/or collusion.

There are too many allowable objections to trades. All of those items listed are open to personal interpretation. Major League teams make trades all the time which are not, on the surface, "equal" in all of those categories listed above. 

Billy Beane has had a very successful career out of making such trades and by using his own personal evaluation methods based on his own thinking, outside of the box, with what the rest of the league would do.

Trades cannot truly be evaluated until years later and everyone has their own opinion, but it is only an opinion. I understand that voting on a posted trade is necessary, but being so hyper critical is not.

What should "organizational make-up" have to do with anything regarding a trade?How is anyone supposed to change their organizational make-up. if all trades must be composed of players with "equal statistics, age, and contract status"? How are the teams with less volume of talent supposed to improve their teams otherwise?

By drafting rookies and waiting years for them to develop? Not many people want to wait years to have even a chance of competing to win in a fantasy sports league. Especially considering that so many teams in this league are in such bad shape  talent-wise and with a limited budget, and are then vacated, partially because they know  most of their trades will be disallowed, after they have been dissected by the league "experts".   

"Any new owner that has a trade vetoed within the first 30 days of ownership will be required to post players on the trade block for a period of 48 hours before any trade can be posted."?

And what is the value in this rule, other than to allow the habitual "veto'ers" to pick  over another team's trade pieces in advance, so they can then prepare an argument for why the next trade should be disallowed?

Sounds more like a self-fulfilling prophecy than anything legitimate for league purposes.

These trade rules only benefit the "haves" and only serve as a detriment to the "have not's".


 



 

« Last Edit: October 06, 2015, 12:46:34 PM by Fitzy1962 »
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

 

Forum Search


Quick Profile

 
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

* Chat Room

Refresh History
  • Daddy: He has two NFL LIVE Superbowl wins. The only two time champion.
    Yesterday at 11:59:49 AM
  • Rhino7: The GOAT lol
    Yesterday at 01:11:16 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: I'm ready for another SB rub
    Yesterday at 01:15:30 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: In NFL
    Yesterday at 01:15:35 PM
  • Mt_Crushmore: Where's all the Gm's other than the norm? Wake up!!! You got a team to run!!!. Let's trade, talk football, get tou FIRED up even though your last in your division.
    Yesterday at 04:22:12 PM
  • Mt_Crushmore: Any YouTube viewers watching dynasty draft? Any your subscribed to?
    Yesterday at 04:31:02 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: Lol
    Yesterday at 04:53:59 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: I get like that too Eric. My goal every offseason is to do at least 1 trade with every gm. Why not? Its fun
    Yesterday at 04:55:00 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: Some guys just dont trade for whatever reason. But the guys who dont arent championship contenders.
    Yesterday at 04:55:47 PM
  • Daddy: They trade, about as often as real teams do. For people that love year round trading, being in one league, one sport, its going to be difficult.
    Yesterday at 05:38:13 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: Not everyone trades. But agreed, for one sport folk like myself. It requires patience
    Yesterday at 06:10:32 PM
  • Alpha5: NFL LIVE is the most difficult league for me and it's not even close
    Yesterday at 07:22:33 PM
  • Daddy: Cant just trade because its fun. There needs to be a purpose behind trading. Get guys you believe in or need to keep improving.
    Yesterday at 08:44:03 PM
  • Daddy: NFL LIVE has the toughest GMs & football is the toughest fantasy sport for DYNASTY. Redraft will always be King of football.
    Yesterday at 08:45:00 PM
  • Daddy: Baseball, hockey, basketball guys struggle with NFL LIVE because its just so damn fast (football careers, roster turnover etc.)
    Yesterday at 08:46:19 PM
  • Alpha5: Limited assets
    Yesterday at 11:05:53 PM
  • Daddy: We all have the same assets
    Today at 12:14:51 AM
  • Alpha5: If a team has 2 QB1s another team has none. If a team in baseball has 2 1B it doesn't leave a team without one.
    Today at 09:09:33 AM
  • Alpha5: That's what I mean by limited assets
    Today at 09:09:53 AM
  • Brent: And that's why I haven't traded Carr yet.  Someone doesn't have a QB or thinks they'll get one in FA/draft and might be left wanting.
    Today at 09:12:28 AM
  • Daddy: @Alpha if a team in MLB LIVE has two starting 1Bs then there is also a team without one.
    Today at 10:30:34 AM
  • ldsjayhawk: @jwalker I make like 2-3 trades a year for each of my baseball teams, maybe.  I'll tell you part of the reason I don't trade.  Every trade discussion starts out with the other team wanting my top prospect regardless of what I am trading for.  I am not trading Jackson Holliday for your backup catcher who is going to play 20 games this year.
    Today at 10:56:16 AM
  • Alpha5: Nah cause position eligibility. 1B/OF, 1B,3B etc
    Today at 11:02:48 AM
  • Daddy: CB/S >> DE/LB >> Taysom Hill QB/TE
    Today at 12:06:43 PM
  • Daddy: Football is just harder. You can build a team and 3 years later its irrelevant due to injury, retirement, roster turnover.
    Today at 12:07:41 PM
  • Alpha5: @ldsjayhawk I get the frustration but you're gonna have to get over that man haha
    Today at 12:29:52 PM
  • Alpha5: And maybe you should trade Jackson Holiday lolol
    Today at 12:32:00 PM
  • Brent: In an offsite league, I inquired about Mason Miller and the guy asked for Jackson Holliday.
    Today at 12:39:24 PM
  • dbreer23: Is it like a 4 team redraft league? :rofl:
    Today at 12:40:30 PM
  • dbreer23: Cris, there is a reason that you are a good owner, bc you can discern a value deal vs. a BS deal. Not all owners are that savvy. They will eventually leave...
    Today at 12:42:49 PM
  • Brent: Nope, 32-team contract league.
    Today at 12:49:09 PM
  • ldsjayhawk: I don't have Holiday.  Just used him as an example since he was the #1 prospect
    Today at 12:56:05 PM
  • ldsjayhawk: @Alpha I do make trades.  I am just not giving up the entire farm to land a guy I can get out of the FA pool
    Today at 12:59:21 PM
  • ldsjayhawk: Trading should be a win-win situation for both teams.
    Today at 01:00:32 PM
  • dbreer23: Agreed. I think the Devers deal in FGM is a good example of that. Devers gives SD some now (and future) pop, giving up substantial pieces to get him (Mayo, Keith, and one other).
    Today at 01:03:48 PM
  • Brent: I had Holliday in FGM before I stepped away.
    Today at 01:24:07 PM
  • Brent: I am glad I cut back on leagues, I was spread too thin.
    Today at 01:24:25 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: @idsjayhawk i understand that. To be clear, i wasnt judging anyone. I just know in NFL Live, you cant just draft 1-7 rds every year and sign a few FAs and be the champion. It wont happen
    Today at 01:52:08 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: Trading isnt easy. But neither is winning
    Today at 01:52:22 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: If you made a list of the most aggressive gms to have stepped foot in nfl live, you will notice the champions will be among them
    Today at 01:53:06 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: You arent gonna win every trade and you HAVE to have a plan. Ive made some horrible trades. I have every year
    Today at 01:53:50 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: Carolina has kyren williams right now cause i traded him for a 2nd and a 4th. Id rather have kyren today lol
    Today at 01:54:28 PM
  • Brent: Agreed.  I have Amon Ra St. Brown and Aiyuk because I traded JJ.  I couldn't have acquired a player like ASB where I was picking in the 1st so I down tiered at WR to make a trio of Chase, ASB and Aiyuk instead of JJ, Chase and fill in the blank.
    Today at 02:09:02 PM
  • ldsjayhawk: That is probably even more true in baseball since your drafts don't payoff for 5 years or so.  And I will admit my conservatism may be the reason I only have one championship here at ProFSL
    Today at 02:10:04 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: jwalkerjr88 is right
    Today at 02:25:49 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: on that u havat trade a bit here and there
    Today at 02:25:57 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: although my last draft class and fa class kinda lead me to a run so it can happen
    Today at 02:27:21 PM
  • Brent: Yeah, it does help to have a big draft class and available cap.
    Today at 02:36:56 PM
  • Brent: I'm contemplating doing a complete tear down in NFL Live and rebuild.  Honestly, I probably should have postered for it to be this season.  I still might, but I would legit need to go into the draft with 3-4 top 10 picks/+ many others.
    Today at 02:38:21 PM
  • Brent: postured
    Today at 02:38:35 PM