Home
Staff
View the memberlist
Search For Members
Portal
Mentions
League Openings
League Search
Login
Register
Leagues
ProFSL: Pro Fantasy Sports Leagues
»
Fantasy Leagues
»
MLB Leagues
»
Franchise GM
»
Franchise GM: History Books
»
Franchise GM: Rules Changes
»
Franchise GM: Clarifications & Discussion
(Moderator:
ldsjayhawk
) »
Rule Change Proposal - 70% Extension Rule
Franchise GM
Wall of FGM Champions
|
Fantrax Page
|
Rulebook
|
Contracts
|
Extension Calculator
|
Transactions
|
Draft Room
|
Draft Order
|
|
|
|
PAPPS
« previous
next »
Print
Pages: [
1
]
2
Go Down
Author
Topic: Rule Change Proposal - 70% Extension Rule (Read 679 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
ldsjayhawk
League Moderator
Legend
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 9966
Bonus inPoints: 0
Rule Change Proposal - 70% Extension Rule
«
on:
January 05, 2023, 02:09:18 PM »
Our free agency pool has diminished over the last few years. More players are being signed to extensions causing this decrease. I believe free agency is an important part of building a team and the pool needs to reflect that. As a result, I am proposing we retire the 70% extension rule in this league. A player could not be signed to an extension for less than the previous season's salary. I believe many of the players in this category would then find their way to free agency, thereby making a more robust free agent pool.
Logged
0
0
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
FGM
2017 + 2x AL West Div
BUSH
AL
2021 + 4x AL Central Div
AFB
AL
2012 + 1x Div
AFB
NL
2018 + 2x Div
RyanJames5
Legend
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 9795
Bonus inPoints: 0
Re: Rule Change Proposal - 70% Extension Rule
«
Reply #1 on:
January 05, 2023, 03:04:09 PM »
I'd be interested to see how many of these extensions actually take place each year. I think that they are likely few and far between and almost all apply to aging veterans that are still way overpaid, even if they extension is given. While it may add a few aging vets to the free agent pool, I would venture to guess it may result in bad overpriced contracts being given out, for players that end up retired and being dead money on rosters.
Logged
0
0
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
2022 FGM Champions
2022 Armchair Champions
2021 Wild Card 2 Champions
2015 Wild Card Baseball World Series Champions
ldsjayhawk
League Moderator
Legend
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 9966
Bonus inPoints: 0
Re: Rule Change Proposal - 70% Extension Rule
«
Reply #2 on:
January 05, 2023, 03:21:21 PM »
When I have a few minutes, I'll take a look and post those from this past extension period.
Logged
0
0
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
FGM
2017 + 2x AL West Div
BUSH
AL
2021 + 4x AL Central Div
AFB
AL
2012 + 1x Div
AFB
NL
2018 + 2x Div
RyanJames5
Legend
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 9795
Bonus inPoints: 0
Re: Rule Change Proposal - 70% Extension Rule
«
Reply #3 on:
January 05, 2023, 03:35:29 PM »
Don't worry about it, I just did some quick looking and many more already than I thought.
I do still think they're mostly aging stars, but it would make for more difficult decisions. Maybe some sort of qualifier based on age? 38 or older you can resign at 70% but younger than that and you can't?
Logged
0
0
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
2022 FGM Champions
2022 Armchair Champions
2021 Wild Card 2 Champions
2015 Wild Card Baseball World Series Champions
ldsjayhawk
League Moderator
Legend
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 9966
Bonus inPoints: 0
Re: Rule Change Proposal - 70% Extension Rule
«
Reply #4 on:
January 05, 2023, 03:40:48 PM »
Maybe there is a better way to do it in general too. I am certainly open to that. The reason I looked at this rule is that players who were taking a salary decrease will almost certainly do that after going through free agency.
Logged
0
0
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
FGM
2017 + 2x AL West Div
BUSH
AL
2021 + 4x AL Central Div
AFB
AL
2012 + 1x Div
AFB
NL
2018 + 2x Div
Paul S.
Legend
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 21961
Bonus inPoints: 0
Re: Rule Change Proposal - 70% Extension Rule
«
Reply #5 on:
January 05, 2023, 08:28:56 PM »
This is the worst rule in FGM and will not be missed if it is discarded. It is rarely used and then only in desperation.
Logged
0
0
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
indiansnation
Legend
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 20763
Bonus inPoints: 0
Re: Rule Change Proposal - 70% Extension Rule
«
Reply #6 on:
January 07, 2023, 11:43:03 PM »
I wont miss if rule is gone
Logged
0
0
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Graffeo21
Rookie
Join Date: Dec 2021
Posts: 447
Bonus inPoints: 0
:NOR:
Re: Rule Change Proposal - 70% Extension Rule
«
Reply #7 on:
January 09, 2023, 04:25:02 PM »
Agree
Logged
0
0
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
DaveW
All-Star
Join Date: Jan 2022
Posts: 1427
Bonus inPoints: 0
Re: Rule Change Proposal - 70% Extension Rule
«
Reply #8 on:
January 10, 2023, 11:38:55 AM »
I like the concept but feel like there needs to be some sort of age-based exception like Ryan mentioned above, where the 70% exception only applies for guys above age x, where x is like 33 or something. Otherwise it's hard to keep aging vets.
Logged
0
0
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
=====================================
MLB LIVE -
Franchise GM -
Field of Dreams -
Anthony
Legend
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 10065
Bonus inPoints: 10000
Re: Rule Change Proposal - 70% Extension Rule
«
Reply #9 on:
January 10, 2023, 01:01:33 PM »
Like this idea, but needs to be flushed out more. Doesn't have to be very confusing, but age/performance should definitely play a factor.
Logged
0
0
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Print
Pages: [
1
]
2
Go Up
« previous
next »
ProFSL: Pro Fantasy Sports Leagues
»
Fantasy Leagues
»
MLB Leagues
»
Franchise GM
»
Franchise GM: History Books
»
Franchise GM: Rules Changes
»
Franchise GM: Clarifications & Discussion
(Moderator:
ldsjayhawk
) »
Rule Change Proposal - 70% Extension Rule
Forum Search
Quick Profile
Username:
Password:
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
Did you miss your
activation email
?
Chat Room
dbreer23
:
Cris, there is a reason that you are a good owner, bc you can discern a value deal vs. a BS deal. Not all owners are that savvy. They will eventually leave...
Today
at 12:42:49 PM
Brent
:
Nope, 32-team contract league.
Today
at 12:49:09 PM
ldsjayhawk
:
I don't have Holiday. Just used him as an example since he was the #1 prospect
Today
at 12:56:05 PM
ldsjayhawk
:
@Alpha I do make trades. I am just not giving up the entire farm to land a guy I can get out of the FA pool
Today
at 12:59:21 PM
ldsjayhawk
:
Trading should be a win-win situation for both teams.
Today
at 01:00:32 PM
dbreer23
:
Agreed. I think the Devers deal in FGM is a good example of that. Devers gives SD some now (and future) pop, giving up substantial pieces to get him (Mayo, Keith, and one other).
Today
at 01:03:48 PM
Brent
:
I had Holliday in FGM before I stepped away.
Today
at 01:24:07 PM
Brent
:
I am glad I cut back on leagues, I was spread too thin.
Today
at 01:24:25 PM
Jwalkerjr88
:
@idsjayhawk i understand that. To be clear, i wasnt judging anyone. I just know in NFL Live, you cant just draft 1-7 rds every year and sign a few FAs and be the champion. It wont happen
Today
at 01:52:08 PM
Jwalkerjr88
:
Trading isnt easy. But neither is winning
Today
at 01:52:22 PM
Jwalkerjr88
:
If you made a list of the most aggressive gms to have stepped foot in nfl live, you will notice the champions will be among them
Today
at 01:53:06 PM
Jwalkerjr88
:
You arent gonna win every trade and you HAVE to have a plan. Ive made some horrible trades. I have every year
Today
at 01:53:50 PM
Jwalkerjr88
:
Carolina has kyren williams right now cause i traded him for a 2nd and a 4th. Id rather have kyren today lol
Today
at 01:54:28 PM
Brent
:
Agreed. I have Amon Ra St. Brown and Aiyuk because I traded JJ. I couldn't have acquired a player like ASB where I was picking in the 1st so I down tiered at WR to make a trio of Chase, ASB and Aiyuk instead of JJ, Chase and fill in the blank.
Today
at 02:09:02 PM
ldsjayhawk
:
That is probably even more true in baseball since your drafts don't payoff for 5 years or so. And I will admit my conservatism may be the reason I only have one championship here at ProFSL
Today
at 02:10:04 PM
BayAreaBallers
:
jwalkerjr88 is right
Today
at 02:25:49 PM
BayAreaBallers
:
on that u havat trade a bit here and there
Today
at 02:25:57 PM
BayAreaBallers
:
although my last draft class and fa class kinda lead me to a run so it can happen
Today
at 02:27:21 PM
Brent
:
Yeah, it does help to have a big draft class and available cap.
Today
at 02:36:56 PM
Brent
:
I'm contemplating doing a complete tear down in NFL Live and rebuild. Honestly, I probably should have postered for it to be this season. I still might, but I would legit need to go into the draft with 3-4 top 10 picks/+ many others.
Today
at 02:38:21 PM
Brent
:
postured
Today
at 02:38:35 PM
Jwalkerjr88
:
Yea nailing drafts and some key FAs helps too. But if you remember BAB you traded alvin kamara for the rams 1-7 draft picks. So the extra picks helped you nail the 2023 draft the way you did
Today
at 03:13:02 PM
Jwalkerjr88
:
Its the combination of all three that is required is what im saying
Today
at 03:13:31 PM
Jwalkerjr88
:
And brent a tear down with you assets would look interesting. Personally i just think you need break one big asset down into 3 good ones and move carr and go from there. But you have an A1 nfl mind so im sure you will nail whatever it is you decide
Today
at 03:14:39 PM
Jwalkerjr88
:
*your
Today
at 03:14:50 PM
BayAreaBallers
:
very good pt yes i did gain lot of capital which propelled me to make more moves from that trade
Today
at 03:34:25 PM
Brent
:
Thank you. Yes, I agree. I do need to break one asset down to 3. I did that with JJ, went from S tier to 2 A tiers. Now I need to potentially go from an A tier to 3 Bs or something like that. I've had some inquiries on Carr, but nothing worth moving him.
Today
at 03:48:17 PM
Alpha5
:
Guarantee I know who he traded Kamara to for 1-7 without even looking
Today
at 05:22:42 PM
BayAreaBallers
:
alpha it was a good trade at the time
Today
at 05:29:49 PM
BayAreaBallers
:
my team was in the Crapter at that pt
Today
at 05:29:58 PM
Brent
:
Who did you draft with the 1st acquired in that trade?
Today
at 05:36:34 PM
Daddy
:
Whoever it was, he got six more choices on top of that. The "win win" scenario.
Today
at 05:53:04 PM
Daddy
:
At that time i had no RB1. So i traded an entire draft class to get one.
Today
at 05:54:10 PM
Daddy
:
SF doubled up his pick haul and went to work, using them in trades & draft return.
Today
at 05:54:46 PM
Daddy
:
Then beat me in the NFC Title game.
Today
at 05:55:32 PM
Daddy
:
RB is a hard position to nail down. If someone wants to trade me 1-7 for Kamara. Step right up.
Today
at 06:02:30 PM
BayAreaBallers
:
I gotta see what I did
Today
at 06:05:04 PM
Daddy
:
You got better
Today
at 06:13:59 PM
BayAreaBallers
:
i did so many moves trades and draft that i honestly dunno
Today
at 06:18:48 PM
Jwalkerjr88
:
This is the way
Today
at 06:21:33 PM
BayAreaBallers
:
I could teach how I did what I did
Today
at 07:33:36 PM
STLBlues91
:
ill be around for a few hours today. Wont be around tomorrow until late
Today
at 07:37:07 PM
TheGOAT
:
Thank God that there are 3 really good qb options in the draft. Can't imagine a world with Bo Nix as my frachise qb
Today
at 08:12:51 PM
TheGOAT
:
Not that hes bad
Today
at 08:13:06 PM
BayAreaBallers
:
think rn my qb room is minshew dobbs wentz
Today
at 08:22:37 PM
Jwalkerjr88
:
We look forward to your return to the playoffs @Thegoat
Today
at 08:22:51 PM
Jwalkerjr88
:
You and your brother camw in guns blazing a few years back. The NFC is not the gauntlet the AFC is. Once you make the title game, all bets are off
Today
at 08:23:33 PM
BayAreaBallers
:
nfc is still tough
Today
at 08:25:23 PM
BayAreaBallers
:
i had a tough road
Today
at 08:25:37 PM
BayAreaBallers
:
to get to teh ship lot of good teams i knocked out
Today
at 08:25:50 PM