Author Topic: PROPOSED: 5 Rule Revision for Goalies  (Read 5724 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline snugerud

  • MVP
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jul 2011
  • Posts: 4392
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
  • I am the ghost of fantasy hockey past
    • :NE:
    • :TOR-NBA:
    • :PIT-NHL:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: PROPOSED: 5 Rule Revision for Goalies
« Reply #30 on: September 07, 2012, 04:47:17 PM »
Did you just call me a communist?,,,,yup pretty sure he just called me a communist.  ha ha ha ha.   :rofl: 

there are 2 sometime 3 days a week that the nhl would have a full enough schedule that you may have to make a choice between goalies.  If you are on dial up it might take you 5 mins to check one of those sites and adjust your goalie for the night  so a total of 15 mins in a week, on dial up. 

Signed,

Your Supreme Leader , Admiral Aladin


« Last Edit: September 07, 2012, 04:49:11 PM by snugerud »
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Bro-Lo El Cunado

joeshmoe

  • Guest
Re: PROPOSED: 5 Rule Revision for Goalies
« Reply #31 on: September 07, 2012, 08:02:24 PM »
Bro weren't you the original commissioner. When was this league weekly line-ups. So what is it weekly or daily line-ups.

I think you've missed it.  There were daily lineups, but with fantrax you can set it up for the week and push play!  Simple, not a lot of work, and helpful to gms who don't have all day for profsl.  Miss something?  How this has to do with orig commish i dont know.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

joeshmoe

  • Guest
Re: PROPOSED: 5 Rule Revision for Goalies
« Reply #32 on: September 07, 2012, 08:08:37 PM »
Did you just call me a communist?,,,,yup pretty sure he just called me a communist.  ha ha ha ha.   :rofl: 

there are 2 sometime 3 days a week that the nhl would have a full enough schedule that you may have to make a choice between goalies.  If you are on dial up it might take you 5 mins to check one of those sites and adjust your goalie for the night  so a total of 15 mins in a week, on dial up. 

Signed,

Your Supreme Leader , Admiral Aladin


Maybe you should brush up on your comprehension because I said I was not a communist, and that not everyone could be.  And that's absolutely true...even though 49% of the US is on welfare, the 51% still need to work really hard not to tick it over the top...which austrian economists know is the no turning back point.  ERGO I don't have every 10 minutes to check on profsl, or every night, to see if some nhl coach changed his lineup.  It's foolish.  And you make it seem as if that never happens...please.  It happens frequently enough it was included in the original set of rules.

Lastly, I said 1 goalie was probably a fine idea...but realize that it will automatically make x amount of teams ineligible to win...this league is only winnable by the very most active gms (or a gm who can help the commish not step on his toes and when he doesn't his teams gets shanked) and that takes away from a fun league.  This isn't a pay league.



sept8-12: post cleaned of inappropriate comments. keep it professional ppl.
« Last Edit: September 08, 2012, 12:21:11 PM by PigsRule »
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline jackdaniels

  • All-Star
  • ***
  • Join Date: Aug 2011
  • Posts: 2384
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
  • just hand me the bottle!
    • :NE:
    • :Blank:
    • :BOS-NHL:
    • :BostonCollege:
    • :NYRB:
    • View Profile
Re: PROPOSED: 5 Rule Revision for Goalies
« Reply #33 on: September 07, 2012, 10:20:33 PM »
The fairest way I believe would be to take all goalie out after 2012-13 season and have a re-draft with current salaries then. 2 round goalie draft (prospects excluded) then the fault would be on the GM to get a goalie that will contribute either now or in the future based on their team.

As much as I like this re-draft idea I don't think it works well at all in a contract dynasty league. It would be perfect in a regular keeper league.

Like I said I'm all for going with 1 starter. You don't want to over adjust without seeing how your first change alters league play.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
:win: 2016-17 FRANCHISE NHL Champion :BOS-NHL:
:win: 2013-14 FRANCHISE NHL Champion :BOS-NHL:

Offline hockeyfreak47

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2011
  • Posts: 8463
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :OTT:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: PROPOSED: 5 Rule Revision for Goalies
« Reply #34 on: September 08, 2012, 01:18:23 AM »

4. cap goalie salaries per team at 10.0m (target revision starting 2014-15)


With most of you agreeing on the 1 starter rule i don't understand why the $10.0m cap rule is that much contested.

Here's my point of view :

The extension price for the best goalie in FNHL is $6.4m. So $10.0m is more than enough for each team to get a starter for a more balance and competitive league.

those who have more than 1 starter will be able to keep their best goalie and trade the other's and get great value for them .

this way we should not see any strating goalie in FA and no 10m bid .

the only way to get 2 starter will be if one of your prospect becomes one.

i see only 1 problem it's big contracts expiring 2014-15 and after.
this could be solved by ending all those contracts for 2013-14.

funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
:NHL: 2011-12 Rebel NHL Stanley Cup Finalist :DET-NHL:       :NHL: 2013-14 Rebel NHL Stanley Cup Finalist :CHI-NHL:
:NHL: 2012-13 Prospectus Maximus NHL Stanley Cup Finalist :CLS:     :NHL: 2013-14 NHL Invita Stanley Cup Finalist :DET-NHL:
:NHL: 2012-13 CHL Division II Stanley Cup Champion :GAT-QHL: :win:
:NHL: 2012-13 Rebel NHL Stanley Cup Champion :DET-NHL: :win:
:NHL: 2012-13 Franchise NHL Stanley Cup Champion :PHO: :win:
 :PGA:  2013 The Clubhouse PGA champion :win:
2013-14 Rebel NHL Presidents Trophy :DET-NHL:
2013-14 NHL Invitational Presidents Trophy :CHI-NHL:

Offline PigsRule

  • League Moderator
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2011
  • Posts: 7161
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :blank:
    • View Profile
Re: PROPOSED: 5 Rule Revision for Goalies
« Reply #35 on: September 08, 2012, 12:27:12 PM »
this thread has been cleaned + off-topic posts moved to the invalid transactions section.


let's stay on topic here ppl.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Florida Panthers ... link to team page

2023-24 FRANCHISE NHL PAYOUT TO CHAMPION ... :money: $530.00USD :money:
ONLY THE BEST OWNERS WANTED


Offline hockeyfreak47

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2011
  • Posts: 8463
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :OTT:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: PROPOSED: 5 Rule Revision for Goalies
« Reply #36 on: September 08, 2012, 01:16:03 PM »
Pigsrule, my language is not offensive.  Communist is not a dirty word.  I am a political philosophy major and I read books all day long on this stuff.  It's quite fine to draw parallels between real life economics and this league. 

Please do not infringe upon my right to free speech. 

The problem is that it artificially caps what a manager can do.  If a manager wants to spend big on goalies they should be able to.  If we cap the money spent on goalies it merely means there will be more ridiculous contracts for other players.  It shifts the problem.  If you let people do what they want it makes it REAL...please please read a very small book, Economics in one easy lesson by the great Austrian Economist Henry Hazlitt...it is all explained very clearly that administrative price setting ALWAYS leads to inefficiency in the market place.  This would be the worst thing we could do to this league is start capping how much can be spent where. 

Am I typing in french?

I do see your point on this and you are right when you say ( If we cap the money spent on goalies it merely means there will be more ridiculous contracts for other players. ) but the problem is not paying big money for players it's team not having any starter . with no cap on goalie we will still have the same problem as 50 % of the league could end up with 2 starter .
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
:NHL: 2011-12 Rebel NHL Stanley Cup Finalist :DET-NHL:       :NHL: 2013-14 Rebel NHL Stanley Cup Finalist :CHI-NHL:
:NHL: 2012-13 Prospectus Maximus NHL Stanley Cup Finalist :CLS:     :NHL: 2013-14 NHL Invita Stanley Cup Finalist :DET-NHL:
:NHL: 2012-13 CHL Division II Stanley Cup Champion :GAT-QHL: :win:
:NHL: 2012-13 Rebel NHL Stanley Cup Champion :DET-NHL: :win:
:NHL: 2012-13 Franchise NHL Stanley Cup Champion :PHO: :win:
 :PGA:  2013 The Clubhouse PGA champion :win:
2013-14 Rebel NHL Presidents Trophy :DET-NHL:
2013-14 NHL Invitational Presidents Trophy :CHI-NHL:

joeshmoe

  • Guest
Re: PROPOSED: 5 Rule Revision for Goalies
« Reply #37 on: September 08, 2012, 01:32:51 PM »
I do see your point on this and you are right when you say ( If we cap the money spent on goalies it merely means there will be more ridiculous contracts for other players. ) but the problem is not paying big money for players it's team not having any starter . with no cap on goalie we will still have the same problem as 50 % of the league could end up with 2 starter .

If you cap the amount paid on goalies (this is not an argument against 1 goalie...I think that's okay) it will INCREASE the problem, if the problem truly is that teams don't have starters.  Let me explain.  The price of goalies will go down, which means teams will have money to spend on more goalies.  If the price was increased (ie. due to natural market demands[supply vs demand]) then teams would have less to spend on goalie #2 and Goalie #3 meaning there the demand goes down, and price goes down, and more teams may afford goalies.


I also don't think that teams need babying by the rules to make sure they have starters....some real NHL teams don't have real starters either!!  You have to make your decisions about spending somewhere.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline Capn Cally

  • MVP
  • ****
  • Join Date: Apr 2012
  • Posts: 3391
  • Bonus inPoints: 10
    • :Blank:
    • :TOR-NBA:
    • :VAN:
    • :Blank:
    • :VAN-MLS:
    • View Profile
Re: PROPOSED: 5 Rule Revision for Goalies
« Reply #38 on: September 08, 2012, 02:20:04 PM »
My opinion.... Joeshmoe should start his own league, brand new from scratch so he can write his own rules, the way HE wants them!

Reading all the posts on this league, it seems like joeshmoe has a problem or disagreement or opinion on almost all of the topics and rules and rulings on here.

Not sure if he's just bitter about his team being screwed over and losing Marchand and Bishop, or if he has a chip on his shoulder against one or more people or commish's in this league, but is sure seems like he's one unhappy bugger!

funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Corey

  • Guest
Re: PROPOSED: 5 Rule Revision for Goalies
« Reply #39 on: September 08, 2012, 06:58:49 PM »
To make these drastic changes is a horrible idea.

Teams made moves because of starting 2 goalies and they points they acquire.

Roster positions and scoring are the two things in leagues that you should not mess with. It would be extremely disappointing if these changed, and a big mistake.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

 


* FNHL Chat

Sorry, this shoutbox does not exist.

Forum Search


Quick Profile

 
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

* Chat Room

Refresh History
  • indiansnation: Jmntl82 pm important messave about armchair
    June 14, 2024, 11:45:05 PM
  • jmntl82: indiansnation-replied
    June 14, 2024, 11:48:26 PM
  • ldsjayhawk: thanks @daddy.  I hold my own
    Yesterday at 12:05:43 AM
  • Braves155: Will be around today for deal talks - ANY sport
    Yesterday at 10:12:32 AM
  • Daddy: You tellem @Braves!
    Yesterday at 11:47:14 AM
  • IndianaBuc: Braves PM
    Yesterday at 03:04:47 PM
  • Braves155: Back
    Yesterday at 03:10:34 PM
  • IndianaBuc: Back
    Yesterday at 03:19:17 PM
  • Daddy: Better be glad Buc dont know hockey. He'd be IndianaPuc on yall asses.
    Yesterday at 03:54:00 PM
  • Braves155: Speaking of NHL. Anyone up for an NHL LIVE deal?
    Yesterday at 04:05:16 PM
  • Braves155: PM Blues
    Yesterday at 04:07:53 PM
  • Brent: I am.  I read up on stuff today, I think I have a direction for my Predators.
    Yesterday at 04:23:17 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: Im here for NFL Live. I get the trade itch every day but ive been suppressing it. Waiting for someone to make me submit to the madness again
    Yesterday at 04:48:32 PM
  • Braves155: Pm there buddy
    Yesterday at 04:53:17 PM
  • Braves155: PM as well dbreer
    Yesterday at 04:58:57 PM
  • dbreer23: replied Braves
    Yesterday at 05:10:11 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: PM Braves
    Yesterday at 05:31:50 PM
  • indiansnation: Hey guys whats up
    Yesterday at 05:31:53 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: NHL LIVE FOLKS sharks have zadina otb any interest message me ask is prospects and picks
    Yesterday at 05:32:27 PM
  • indiansnation: Lets talk trade
    Yesterday at 05:32:30 PM
  • indiansnation: Indians mlb live looking to trade
    Yesterday at 05:37:05 PM
  • indiansnation: Nfl live colts looking for starting rb
    Yesterday at 05:37:24 PM
  • indiansnation: Braves155 pm
    Yesterday at 05:38:39 PM
  • indiansnation: ldsjayhawks pm
    Yesterday at 05:38:48 PM
  • Daddy: Oh Crap. Trade winds blowing like P Diddy sponsored them.
    Yesterday at 05:45:23 PM
  • Daddy: Flyers, Rams, Blue Jays, 76ers have responded to all inquiries. Not that my inbox gets flooded with offers. My teams all stink.
    Yesterday at 05:47:35 PM
  • Daddy: T Wolves loaded but its too early yet. Cant wait for NBA.
    Yesterday at 05:49:02 PM
  • indiansnation: Braves155 pm
    Yesterday at 07:25:36 PM
  • indiansnation: Daddy pm
    Yesterday at 07:28:41 PM
  • Daddy: Back Brian
    Yesterday at 07:39:44 PM
  • indiansnation: Back daddy
    Yesterday at 07:47:43 PM
  • Daddy: I want to trade in NBA LIVE too. Its just the baby stages and we dont even know the summer player movement yet. Rosters will look different by the time of the draft.
    Yesterday at 07:54:55 PM
  • Daddy: Its exciting. Only CCD remains active in basketball. Ive seen LOR fail here but get picked up elsewhere and i guess its ok.
    Yesterday at 07:56:11 PM
  • Daddy: They all pretty much use the same format. NBA LIVE we feel weve revolutionized todays Dynasty basketball standards.
    Yesterday at 07:57:00 PM
  • Daddy: Cant wait to trade but weve got 11 owners to find and an entire summer of movement to track.
    Yesterday at 07:58:52 PM
  • indiansnation: Braves155 pm offer sent
    Yesterday at 07:58:55 PM
  • Daddy: Lots of traffic onsite. Weve been near 1000 visitors all day. Im told they find out chat entertaining. Thats funny. If you are visiting and see this chat.
    Yesterday at 08:02:20 PM
  • Daddy: Welcome to ProFsl. We do Fantasy "Dynasty" Sports here & we do it better than anyone else.
    Yesterday at 08:03:08 PM
  • Daddy: Better than your site. Better than your Leagues. Better than anyone else ever cared to do it. Legends of dynasty sports have and continue to play here
    Yesterday at 08:04:12 PM
  • indiansnation: Braves155 post it
    Yesterday at 08:11:03 PM
  • Daddy: If you like fantasy sports but all you do is read the chat. You got no clue what you are missing out on.
    Yesterday at 08:13:21 PM
  • Daddy: We are why you bothered to try fantasy sports. We give you everything you need here to live out your dynastic fantasy dreams. Against real world wide competition.
    Yesterday at 08:14:32 PM
  • Braves155: Nice dealing Brian, posted
    Yesterday at 08:22:53 PM
  • indiansnation: Still looking to make trades in mlb live if anyone is up for it
    Yesterday at 11:45:44 PM
  • Daddy: Im looking for an SP. We all value pitching in LIVE.
    Today at 12:01:51 AM
  • Daddy: Bradish! :soapbox: your elbow may cost me everything.
    Today at 12:02:55 AM
  • indiansnation: Man thats gotta suck
    Today at 12:41:47 AM
  • indiansnation: i think i mentioned that to u daddy u lack debth in sp
    Today at 12:42:27 AM
  • indiansnation: Looking to trade in mlb live
    Today at 12:45:05 AM
  • Daddy: Shut up Brian
    Today at 01:32:49 AM