Home
Staff
View the memberlist
Search For Members
Portal
Mentions
League Openings
League Search
Login
Register
Leagues
ProFSL: Pro Fantasy Sports Leagues
»
Fantasy Leagues
»
NBA Leagues
»
Cross-Court Dynasty
»
Cross-Court Dynasty: Archives
(Moderators:
IndianaBuc
,
Billy
,
Interpaga
,
Rhino7
) »
Possible new rule- 1 year extensions
Cross-Court Dynasty
Fantrax
|
Rules
|
Official Rosters
::
::
::
« previous
next »
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Down
Author
Topic: Possible new rule- 1 year extensions (Read 409 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Billy
League Moderator
Legend
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 46939
Bonus inPoints: 197
Ride or Die
Possible new rule- 1 year extensions
«
on:
July 15, 2022, 05:57:26 PM »
We already have a rule in place where if you sign someone in FA to a 1 year deal, they are ineligible for an extension and will back to FA the following year. This post is to gauge reception to also making this rule included extensions. Meaning if you extend someone for 1 year, they automatically go to FA the following season. This would only impact future extensions, not ones already made.
This is mainly to make it more realistic as players usually only accept 1 year deals as a provide it deal to hit the open market the next year for a bigger payday. And it would possibly make FA more exciting each year if better players hit FA.
Please post your thoughts.
Logged
0
0
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
CCD 2012-13 7th Seed in West/Lost in 2nd round
CCD 2013-14 5th Seed in West/Lost in 1st Round
CCD 2014-15 2nd Seed in West/Lost in West Finals
CCD 2015-16 5th Seed in West/Lost in 1st Round
CCD 2016-17 2nd Seed in West/Lost in 2nd Round
CCD 2017-18 Did not make playoffs
CCD 2020-21 1st Seed in East/Lost in East Finals
DynastyDeacon
All-Star
Join Date: Oct 2020
Posts: 1351
Bonus inPoints: 0
20+ Year Dynasty Veteran
Re: Possible new rule- 1 year extensions
«
Reply #1 on:
July 15, 2022, 08:27:15 PM »
I've probably taken advantage of 1-year extensions more than anyone. I extended Donovan Mitchell for 1-year when I needed the RFA 1.2 multiplier, then extended him to a longer term deal the year after.
That being said I think the rule totally makes sense to have to extend someone for at least 2 years. It certainly changes the strategy a bit. I think it will be good for the league and great for league parity as teams can't hang onto their stars as easily in some situations. Anything that increases league parity and helps the worse team is something I will gladly vote for. If it comes up to a vote I would vote for a minimum of two years to extend anyone (free agent or already on your team) if you want to be eligible to extend them again.
Logged
0
0
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Cross-Court Dynasty - New York Knicks
Rhino7
League Moderator
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2022
Posts: 532
Bonus inPoints: 0
Re: Possible new rule- 1 year extensions
«
Reply #2 on:
July 17, 2022, 11:04:47 AM »
Since 1 year deals are typically the prove it deals, make it where if you sign a player to a 1 year deal then the following season you have 2 choices: sign them to a max deal or let them walk.
Logged
0
0
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
2023-2024 NFL Live Superbowl Champion
2023-2024 CCD Pacific Division Champion
OUDAN
Legend
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 12262
Bonus inPoints: 0
Re: Possible new rule- 1 year extensions
«
Reply #3 on:
July 18, 2022, 01:34:47 AM »
I would support this change
Logged
0
0
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
"People don't know what it means to be champions, Oklahoma invented it."
-Barry "The King" Switzer
"Clear eyes, full hearts, can't lose!
-Coach Taylor
I hated every moment of training but I said, "Don't quit, Suffer now and live the rest of your life as a Champion."
-Mohammed Ali
2014 FGM Champ
2015 Moneyball Champ
2015 Bush League Champ
Braves155
All-Star
Join Date: Jan 2022
Posts: 1324
Bonus inPoints: 0
Newbie
Re: Possible new rule- 1 year extensions
«
Reply #4 on:
July 18, 2022, 06:50:40 PM »
Can e up the RFA multiplier to say 1.6 or 1.8, so if that team wants to try using th 1 yr RFA tag, it costs more upfront. Possibly acting more as a 'challenge' to that owner to decide on th tag then long-term deal.
OR
Make the 1 yr deal players an auto max or walk type deal.
Logged
0
0
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Brent
Legend
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 15383
Bonus inPoints: 3
LSU National Champions 2019
Re: Possible new rule- 1 year extensions
«
Reply #5 on:
July 18, 2022, 07:30:47 PM »
Everyone trying to penalize GMs who draft well or can evaluate talent better than others. FA is for people who can't draft and have to rely on players already proving their worth.
Logged
0
0
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
2023 Field of Dreams - League Champion
2022-23 Buckets of Dimes - Eastern Conference Champion
2021-2022 NFL Live - 30-4 (4-2) 2X NFC Runner-up/1X NFC South Champs
2018-2020 NFL Countdown - 37-11 (3-2) 1X NFC Runner Up/2X NFC South Champs
8 ProFSL Hosted League Championships 2010-2019
Proud Member of the Who Dat Nation!
Billy
League Moderator
Legend
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 46939
Bonus inPoints: 197
Ride or Die
Re: Possible new rule- 1 year extensions
«
Reply #6 on:
July 18, 2022, 07:56:07 PM »
The RFA multiplier is not increasing. This isn?t going to be some complicated thing like every single rule proposal becomes.
This is going to be straight forward if it?s put in place. 1 year extensions will automatically go to FA the following year. No special caveats or anything like that.
As stated, it?s a proposal to make things more realistic and make you really think about it if you want to lock that player up for multiple years or take the 1 year and let them go.
Logged
0
1
0
No reactions
Members reacted like:
Brent,
No reactions
CCD 2012-13 7th Seed in West/Lost in 2nd round
CCD 2013-14 5th Seed in West/Lost in 1st Round
CCD 2014-15 2nd Seed in West/Lost in West Finals
CCD 2015-16 5th Seed in West/Lost in 1st Round
CCD 2016-17 2nd Seed in West/Lost in 2nd Round
CCD 2017-18 Did not make playoffs
CCD 2020-21 1st Seed in East/Lost in East Finals
Sabers162
Fan
Join Date: Jun 2022
Posts: 32
Bonus inPoints: 0
Newbie
:MUD:
Re: Possible new rule- 1 year extensions
«
Reply #7 on:
July 19, 2022, 03:41:51 PM »
Being the new guy I am still trying to figure out the rules and see how everything plays out, so I am good with whatever.
With that said, could we possibly change the drop player penalty to simulate the NBA more realistically by doing the stretch provision or would that be too difficult to keep track of?
Logged
0
0
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Up
« previous
next »
ProFSL: Pro Fantasy Sports Leagues
»
Fantasy Leagues
»
NBA Leagues
»
Cross-Court Dynasty
»
Cross-Court Dynasty: Archives
(Moderators:
IndianaBuc
,
Billy
,
Interpaga
,
Rhino7
) »
Possible new rule- 1 year extensions
Forum Search
Quick Profile
Username:
Password:
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
Did you miss your
activation email
?
Chat Room
Daddy
:
Let me ask you... What has any other hockey league done in the last 24 hours?
Yesterday
at 02:33:00 AM
Daddy
:
Including the NHL
Yesterday
at 02:33:40 AM
Daddy
:
This LIVE Crap is next level. See for yourself.
Yesterday
at 02:34:21 AM
Braves155
:
Morning LIVE Fanatics
Yesterday
at 09:39:56 AM
Braves155
:
Who's round today for talks? I did receive a few PMs, so I'll respond to those shortly
Yesterday
at 01:17:33 PM
STLBlues91
:
I am always around
Yesterday
at 01:19:42 PM
Braves155
:
Is there an NHL LIVE spreadsheet?
Yesterday
at 01:22:30 PM
STLBlues91
:
Yeah its the NHL Live Rosters LINK
Yesterday
at 01:44:36 PM
Daddy
:
I keep forgetting to link the icons. My bad.
Yesterday
at 01:55:13 PM
BayAreaBallers
:
Champions League final today
Yesterday
at 02:20:42 PM
indiansnation
:
Jim w pm
Yesterday
at 06:58:32 PM
indiansnation
:
Braves155 pm
Yesterday
at 06:59:45 PM
Braves155
:
Replied
Yesterday
at 07:01:58 PM
Mt_Crushmore
:
Shout out to Daddy for putting this NHL LIVE.
Yesterday
at 07:33:38 PM
Mt_Crushmore
:
Round of applause to the team of admins
Yesterday
at 07:35:27 PM
Braves155
:
PM Crushmore
Yesterday
at 07:56:05 PM
indiansnation
:
Braves155 pm
Yesterday
at 08:07:50 PM
indiansnation
:
Hey Pittsburgh looking to move remaining picks in 2024 and 2025 NHL live
Yesterday
at 08:09:10 PM
Daddy
:
The NHL LIVE DRAFT is 3 DAYS AFTER the NHL Draft. Get those rosters ready for your picks.
Yesterday
at 08:27:41 PM
Daddy
:
We hit the ground running lol
Yesterday
at 08:28:36 PM
indiansnation
:
Alpha5 pm
Yesterday
at 08:35:08 PM
indiansnation
:
Braves155 pm
Yesterday
at 09:06:59 PM
Mt_Crushmore
:
Tampa Bay Lightning open for offers. Looking for LW/RW.
Yesterday
at 09:14:08 PM
STLBlues91
:
Im around the rest of the night for any trades
Yesterday
at 11:03:43 PM
Daddy
:
If i don't have offers in my inbox for baseball, there are messages from football or hockey. Its the profsl experience ive been wanting.
Today
at 12:07:26 AM
Daddy
:
Excited for NBA
Today
at 12:07:45 AM
STLBlues91
:
Im just looking at the draft prospects this and next year figuring out my plan
Today
at 12:08:08 AM
STLBlues91
:
Im ready for that expansion draft
Today
at 12:08:19 AM
Daddy
:
Yeah so about that. One team get first pick in the expansion draft. The other gets first pick in the amateur draft.
Today
at 12:10:24 AM
STLBlues91
:
Yeah figured that was how it would be
Today
at 12:11:15 AM
Daddy
:
I could flip a coin but nobody but me would see it. So a number has been selected between 1-32. You are both getting pms along with the two other mods.
Today
at 12:12:09 AM
STLBlues91
:
Sounds good. When you thinking this will occur
Today
at 12:12:41 AM
Daddy
:
Whomever guesses closer to the number gets the 1st overall pick in the amateur draft. The other picks first in expansion.
Today
at 12:13:04 AM
Daddy
:
Im getting it out the way tomorrow
Today
at 12:13:49 AM
Daddy
:
Ive got the tools now to build the matrix and the league.
Today
at 12:14:20 AM
STLBlues91
:
Sounds good, I will be thinking of a solid number
Today
at 12:15:05 AM
Daddy
:
Best get to building it.
Today
at 12:15:32 AM
Daddy
:
Honestly idk why the NBA doesn't do it that way for expanding. Two teams at a time. Expansion draft to amateur draft. I think the idea is fresh and its execution will be pretty dope.
Today
at 12:25:15 AM
jimw
:
I think the NBA goes one team at a time to give the one team a better talent pool in the expansion draft and also to keep the teams from complaining about losing more players
Today
at 01:25:47 AM
Daddy
:
Thats fair
Today
at 01:27:48 AM
BayAreaBallers
:
that makes sense
Today
at 01:32:38 AM
Daddy
:
I mean they only losing one guy anyway tho. We expose 10 players, protect 5 players, each team, all 30 will lose one player.
Today
at 01:36:30 AM
Daddy
:
The expansion teams will then both have 15 players heading into the amateur draft with picks #1 & #2.
Today
at 01:37:43 AM
Daddy
:
Each other team will still have 14 players and one first round pick.
Today
at 01:38:26 AM
Daddy
:
They need to hire me is what they need to do
Today
at 01:38:53 AM
Daddy
:
Yeah you lose a guy to the expansion draft. Likely your 6th man. Then the very next day you draft his replacement and keep it moving.
Today
at 01:40:25 AM
STLBlues91
:
Daddy quick question in your messages
Today
at 01:44:14 AM
Daddy
:
We are good to go.
Today
at 02:01:09 AM
jimw
:
I think in the Bobcat expansion each team could protect 8 players. And I think the bobcats has to take at least 14 so half the league didn't even lose a player.
Today
at 02:09:14 AM
jimw
:
That was a long time ago though
Today
at 02:09:59 AM