Home
Staff
View the memberlist
Search For Members
Portal
Mentions
League Openings
League Search
Login
Register
Leagues
ProFSL: Pro Fantasy Sports Leagues
»
Fantasy Leagues
»
NBA Leagues
»
Cross-Court Dynasty
»
Cross-Court Dynasty: Archives
(Moderators:
IndianaBuc
,
Billy
,
Interpaga
,
Rhino7
) »
League Wide Vote- Cash Exchanged On Player's Contract
Cross-Court Dynasty
Fantrax
|
Rules
|
Official Rosters
::
::
::
« previous
next »
Print
Pages:
1
2
[
3
]
4
5
6
7
Go Down
Author
Topic: League Wide Vote- Cash Exchanged On Player's Contract (Read 2294 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
DynastyDeacon
All-Star
Join Date: Oct 2020
Posts: 1351
Bonus inPoints: 0
20+ Year Dynasty Veteran
Re: League Wide Vote- Cash Exchanged On Player's Contract
«
Reply #20 on:
April 30, 2022, 09:48:51 AM »
My primary goal with my vote of #4 $10m net cash exchange is to find a reasonable compromise to save cash exchanges from being eliminated, while also allowing for a competitive league.
I really really want to keep cash exchanges. I am very frustrated with the votes for #5 because I view that as not being reasonable and therefore not being able to beat a head to head vote with no cash exchanges in a final vote. A vote for #5 is essentially a vote for no cash exchanges.
Option #5 of 25% limit of total contract still means a team can trade for stars like Anthony Davis $120m total contract (4 years at $30m) and get him fully paid in the current year. A team can trade for anyone fully paid in the current year as long as their contract is 4 years or more as that is 25%. So a team can trade for Anthony Davis fully paid this year and another star or two fully paid this year, get to $175m+ total cap, then since you can be over the salary cap in future years they can have that same team locked in (assuming all other players also on long term contracts) for the next 3 years after the current one.
25% of total contract also means rebuilding teams looking to trade decent/good players on expensive contracts cannot do so because they are limited to only 25% paid. So they cannot trade the player away or get very little in return. IE: Toronto Raptors traded Norman Powell $11.3m on an expiring contract fully paid to Oklahoma City Thunder last year. Toronto is probably stuck with Norman Powell who doesn't fit the rebuild if there is a 25% limit as the max paid could only be $2.8m (25%) so any team getting him would still have to pay $8.5m. Not many if any teams are making that trade. A net $10m would mean that Powell could go to any number of competitive teams (assuming they didn't have other trades that affected net $10m) at a cost of only $1.3m for the acquiring team as Toronto could pay $10m. If a team had paid on other players they could potentially still get Powell fully paid.
If it comes down to a head to head of no cash exchanges vs. 25% of total contract limit I am reluctantly voting to eliminate cash exchanges as the alternative isn't reasonable. I think others will also vote the same way. I really really want to keep cash exchanges so this is extremely frustrating as I think net $10m can beat no cash exchanges, but $25m net, 25% contract limit, and keeping things the same don't have much of a chance. I think 25% contract limit is even worse than $25m net cash exchange limit as you can still go as high as you want in the current season and have everyone fully paid as long as they are on 4 year or more contracts. Plus then you have more stars and superstars than net $25m would allow and you can keep those players with the total team contract well above the net $25m limit for the next several years.
Everyone is entitled to their vote and to vote however they want. I certainly respect everyone's vote and know people vote differently for their own reasons, but I would consider what the final vote will be when making a vote in this qualifier round to narrow down the options in a future vote. Unwillingness to compromise now means you may get something further from what you want in the end.
«
Last Edit: April 30, 2022, 10:04:05 AM by DynastyDeacon
»
Logged
0
1
0
No reactions
Members reacted like:
tdtdtd,
No reactions
Cross-Court Dynasty - New York Knicks
Interpaga
League Moderator
All-Star
Join Date: Oct 2020
Posts: 1052
Bonus inPoints: 0
Newbie
:blank:
Re: League Wide Vote- Cash Exchanged On Player's Contract
«
Reply #21 on:
April 30, 2022, 12:02:24 PM »
We generally agree with the post above, with the difference that, between option 2 and option 5 (the two most voted options), we prefer option 5. We really do not like removing at all cash exchanges.
In particular, we agree that after the first vote equally split between no cash and $25m net limit, probably the best solution for the league is something in the middle. The problem is that, in our opinion, option 4 is too much close to having no cash exchange and not attractive for some teams if applied without a phase-out period (a net limit of $25m in 2023, decreasing to $15m from 2024 would be definitely better for us). A combination of option 5 with the addition of a limit for total net cash exchange would be the best solution for us but, considering that options cannot be changed, we confirm vote for option 5
«
Last Edit: April 30, 2022, 12:10:23 PM by Interpaga
»
Logged
0
0
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
ajm5551
All-Star
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 1049
Bonus inPoints: 50
Re: League Wide Vote- Cash Exchanged On Player's Contract
«
Reply #22 on:
May 01, 2022, 08:20:12 PM »
Orlando Votes Option 5
Thanks for organizing this, and great discussion! All great ideas
Logged
0
0
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Cross-Court Dynasty: 2022-23 Eastern Conference Champions
Chicago Bulls Fan
Chicago Cubs Fan
Miami Dolphins Fan
RyanJames5
Legend
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 9841
Bonus inPoints: 0
Re: League Wide Vote- Cash Exchanged On Player's Contract
«
Reply #23 on:
May 02, 2022, 11:15:34 AM »
Seems option 5 is the best of these, since I don't want cash exchanges to go away
Logged
0
0
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
2022 FGM Champions
2022 Armchair Champions
2021 Wild Card 2 Champions
2015 Wild Card Baseball World Series Champions
Braves155
All-Star
Join Date: Jan 2022
Posts: 1333
Bonus inPoints: 0
Newbie
Re: League Wide Vote- Cash Exchanged On Player's Contract
«
Reply #24 on:
May 02, 2022, 01:20:27 PM »
I vote Option 5. However, I do think there should be a strict cash amt per transaction (Ie 10-12M/player) and an absolute MAX and MIN a team may give and/or receive any given year.
If we go by an ABSOLUTE MAX received/dealt in a season, I propose something along the lines of $50/$40. This way it will enable teams some flexibility in terms of competing/rebuilding, but keeping the competitive balance within the league. I do think much more either way could bring about potential issues, so we will need to discuss limitations if #5 is most popular/voted for.
«
Last Edit: May 03, 2022, 10:13:51 AM by Braves155
»
Logged
0
0
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Anthony
Legend
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 10065
Bonus inPoints: 10000
Re: League Wide Vote- Cash Exchanged On Player's Contract
«
Reply #25 on:
May 03, 2022, 01:06:59 PM »
3
Logged
0
1
0
No reactions
Members reacted like:
DynastyDeacon,
No reactions
STLBlues91
All-Star
Join Date: Jan 2022
Posts: 1268
Bonus inPoints: 0
Took over teams 2021-2022 season
Re: League Wide Vote- Cash Exchanged On Player's Contract
«
Reply #26 on:
May 04, 2022, 06:00:36 PM »
5
Logged
0
0
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Armchair NL champs 22 & 23
NFL Live-Miami Dolphins
jojowalkwalk
MVP
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 4385
Bonus inPoints: 21
Co Founder NFL LIVE
Re: League Wide Vote- Cash Exchanged On Player's Contract
«
Reply #27 on:
May 04, 2022, 06:28:45 PM »
Option 1
Logged
0
0
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Jonathan Sr.
NFL
LIVE
Milton
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2018
Posts: 568
Bonus inPoints: 0
Newbie
:NOR:
:blank:
Re: League Wide Vote- Cash Exchanged On Player's Contract
«
Reply #28 on:
May 04, 2022, 09:01:32 PM »
5
Logged
0
0
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
OUDAN
Legend
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 12262
Bonus inPoints: 0
Re: League Wide Vote- Cash Exchanged On Player's Contract
«
Reply #29 on:
May 04, 2022, 09:23:16 PM »
Option 5 for
Logged
0
0
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
"People don't know what it means to be champions, Oklahoma invented it."
-Barry "The King" Switzer
"Clear eyes, full hearts, can't lose!
-Coach Taylor
I hated every moment of training but I said, "Don't quit, Suffer now and live the rest of your life as a Champion."
-Mohammed Ali
2014 FGM Champ
2015 Moneyball Champ
2015 Bush League Champ
Print
Pages:
1
2
[
3
]
4
5
6
7
Go Up
« previous
next »
ProFSL: Pro Fantasy Sports Leagues
»
Fantasy Leagues
»
NBA Leagues
»
Cross-Court Dynasty
»
Cross-Court Dynasty: Archives
(Moderators:
IndianaBuc
,
Billy
,
Interpaga
,
Rhino7
) »
League Wide Vote- Cash Exchanged On Player's Contract
Forum Search
Quick Profile
Username:
Password:
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
Did you miss your
activation email
?
Chat Room
Daddy
:
I know you dont endorse them. Never did. I paid for lots of crap i never used. Just for NFL Sunday Ticket.
Yesterday
at 05:52:45 PM
Jwalkerjr88
:
I dont and didnt endorse cable period. The irony is streaming is becoming cable now.
Yesterday
at 05:55:39 PM
Jwalkerjr88
:
I paid for directtv version 1-2 years when i had my apartment. Not as much as the 35+ crowd but they did
Yesterday
at 05:56:34 PM
Daddy
:
Still never watched a game on YouTube. I miss the days of CBS = AFC >> FOX/NBC = NFC >> ABC = MNF
Yesterday
at 05:56:42 PM
Jwalkerjr88
:
There was no reason to have directtv outside of sunday ticket. My apartment couldnt get it so i paid ONLY for sunday ticket
Yesterday
at 05:57:04 PM
Daddy
:
I was ok with TNF & SNF.
Yesterday
at 05:57:43 PM
Daddy
:
Its all over the place now. So ive stuck with what i know. The Ticket. I can't miss a Rams game. Not gonna do it.
Yesterday
at 05:58:45 PM
Jwalkerjr88
:
Now they stream some games only on amazon and peacock. I need a streaming lawsuit
Yesterday
at 06:01:20 PM
indiansnation
:
Dont forget disney + soon u will stream games pn their
Yesterday
at 09:43:09 PM
indiansnation
:
Disney trying yo buy nfl network and using espn as part of the trade off nfl will own a certain % of espn. First deal eas 70m for nfl network but nfl turned that down real quick
Yesterday
at 09:46:43 PM
indiansnation
:
Anyone want to talk trade nfl live,mlb live,fgm,armchair
Yesterday
at 10:00:02 PM
indiansnation
:
And any other league that im in that i didnt post yet
Yesterday
at 10:00:35 PM
Daddy
:
They keep throwing insane money at the NFL to televise games and owners share those shiny pennies just enough with the players.
Yesterday
at 10:39:25 PM
ldsjayhawk
:
I'm available. Not sure if we match up anywhere other than NHL Live, but let me know if there's something you're interested in @Brian
Yesterday
at 10:45:39 PM
ldsjayhawk
:
The other leagues for me are FGM, MLB Live and DNHL in case any-one else is looking to do a deal
Yesterday
at 10:49:01 PM
Daddy
:
Healthy mix. Couple baseball, couple hockey, different scoring options.
Yesterday
at 11:08:15 PM
Daddy
:
You probably kick ass in all of them although NHL LIVE hasnt officially started.
Yesterday
at 11:08:42 PM
Daddy
:
I respect your gaming options
Yesterday
at 11:09:54 PM
Daddy
:
I would for sure be an FGM or Armchair owner if i were here for baseball. Powerhouse too. Why not? Great leagues with better LMs.
Yesterday
at 11:16:38 PM
Daddy
:
DNHL must be 15 years old. Gotta be doing something right. Most leagues dont make it past 5. Very few make it 10.
Yesterday
at 11:20:45 PM
Daddy
:
I think Rob been running that league longer than ive been on profsl. Legendary LM.
Yesterday
at 11:22:42 PM
indiansnation
:
Jmntl82 pm important messave about armchair
Yesterday
at 11:45:05 PM
jmntl82
:
indiansnation-replied
Yesterday
at 11:48:26 PM
ldsjayhawk
:
thanks @daddy. I hold my own
Today
at 12:05:43 AM
Braves155
:
Will be around today for deal talks - ANY sport
Today
at 10:12:32 AM
Daddy
:
You tellem @Braves!
Today
at 11:47:14 AM
IndianaBuc
:
Braves PM
Today
at 03:04:47 PM
Braves155
:
Back
Today
at 03:10:34 PM
IndianaBuc
:
Back
Today
at 03:19:17 PM
Daddy
:
Better be glad Buc dont know hockey. He'd be IndianaPuc on yall asses.
Today
at 03:54:00 PM
Braves155
:
Speaking of NHL. Anyone up for an NHL LIVE deal?
Today
at 04:05:16 PM
Braves155
:
PM Blues
Today
at 04:07:53 PM
Brent
:
I am. I read up on stuff today, I think I have a direction for my Predators.
Today
at 04:23:17 PM
Jwalkerjr88
:
Im here for NFL Live. I get the trade itch every day but ive been suppressing it. Waiting for someone to make me submit to the madness again
Today
at 04:48:32 PM
Braves155
:
Pm there buddy
Today
at 04:53:17 PM
Braves155
:
PM as well dbreer
Today
at 04:58:57 PM
dbreer23
:
replied Braves
Today
at 05:10:11 PM
BayAreaBallers
:
PM Braves
Today
at 05:31:50 PM
indiansnation
:
Hey guys whats up
Today
at 05:31:53 PM
BayAreaBallers
:
NHL LIVE FOLKS sharks have zadina otb any interest message me ask is prospects and picks
Today
at 05:32:27 PM
indiansnation
:
Lets talk trade
Today
at 05:32:30 PM
indiansnation
:
Indians mlb live looking to trade
Today
at 05:37:05 PM
indiansnation
:
Nfl live colts looking for starting rb
Today
at 05:37:24 PM
indiansnation
:
Braves155 pm
Today
at 05:38:39 PM
indiansnation
:
ldsjayhawks pm
Today
at 05:38:48 PM
Daddy
:
Oh Crap. Trade winds blowing like P Diddy sponsored them.
Today
at 05:45:23 PM
Daddy
:
Flyers, Rams, Blue Jays, 76ers have responded to all inquiries. Not that my inbox gets flooded with offers. My teams all stink.
Today
at 05:47:35 PM
Daddy
:
T Wolves loaded but its too early yet. Cant wait for NBA.
Today
at 05:49:02 PM
indiansnation
:
Braves155 pm
Today
at 07:25:36 PM
indiansnation
:
Daddy pm
Today
at 07:28:41 PM