Author Topic: Rule Change Discussions  (Read 3255 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Jss0062

  • MVP
  • ****
  • Join Date: Sep 2013
  • Posts: 2533
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :DAL:
    • :SA:
    • :Blank:
    • :Texas:
    • View Profile
Re: Rule Change Discussions
« Reply #20 on: August 25, 2016, 02:57:53 AM »
Just out of curiosity, is the league experiencing major problems from this "tanking" situation? Like real life, are teams not being competitive purposely so they can compete later?

In real life a team still has to be fielded.

funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

chrisetc21

  • Guest
Re: Rule Change Discussions
« Reply #21 on: August 25, 2016, 07:14:31 PM »
One more thing I wanted to discuss is the DL.  Right now we can only place people on the DL that are on the MLB 60 day DL.  I think this is flawed.  MLB teams only place people on the 60 day when they need to clear 40 man roster space, it really doesn't necessarily have anything to do with the severity of the injury.  Right now, if a player is out for the season in our league he cannot be put on the DL unless the corresponding MLB org puts him on the 60 day DL.  I think we should change this.  If a player is out for the year in our league he should be allowed to placed on the 60 day DL.  The only caveat I would add is that once you add someone who is declared out for the season to the 60 Day DL he cannot be reinstated for that season. 
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

chrisetc21

  • Guest
Re: Rule Change Discussions
« Reply #22 on: August 25, 2016, 11:58:53 PM »
I tried to tighten up some of the signing rules so they're easier to read.  Please look them over.

Free Agency Rules
http://www.profsl.com/smf/index.php?topic=131562.0

International Free Agency Rules
http://www.profsl.com/smf/index.php?topic=159576.0
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline ldsjayhawk

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2011
  • Posts: 9997
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :CLS:
    • :Kansas:
    • :SKC:
    • :KC:
    • View Profile
Re: Rule Change Discussions
« Reply #23 on: August 26, 2016, 12:57:52 AM »
Every league that has a DL requires the player to be out on the DL by the MLB team.  Why are we trying to change basic rules?  Who is going to make the determination that the player is out for the season?  or do we then lose the 60 day DL for those who are going to be out less than the rest of the season? 
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
FGM :win: :SEA: 2017 + 2x AL West Div
BUSH AL :Bronze: :KC: 2021 + 4x AL Central Div
AFB AL :Bronze: :KC: 2012 + 1x Div
AFB NL :Bronze: :COL: 2018 + 2x Div

Offline Maydab23

  • All-Star
  • ***
  • Join Date: Sep 2013
  • Posts: 2111
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :Blank:
    • :LAL:
    • :Blank:
    • :UCLA:
    • View Profile
Re: Rule Change Discussions
« Reply #24 on: August 26, 2016, 01:44:59 AM »
As someone who has had I think 7 or 8 different players go on and/or off the 60day DL at some point this season I don't like the idea of a player on 60day DL must be on it all year. A lot of those players on the 60day DL come back mid year from TJS from previous year and now you are telling me I either need to hold a roster spot for those 7 or 8 guys all year or commit to not playing them even as they spend half a year playing in real life.

That said I see the problem Chris is pointing out and agree it is a legitimate problem. Case in point, Jordan Walden took up a roster spot on my team for about 15 months while being injured before the real life Cards decided to Move him from 15 to 60day DL.

So, while I agree there is a problem I don't agree with the proposed solution.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

chrisetc21

  • Guest
Re: Rule Change Discussions
« Reply #25 on: August 26, 2016, 04:45:43 PM »
Well we could tell someone is out for the year when the team says the player is out for the year.  This happens all the time.  Players who have surgeries or break bones are sometimes left on the 15 day DL but are listed out for the year. 

The 60 day DL is a function of 40 man roster spots in MLB, it's not a function simply of the length of time someone is going to be injured. 

I'm simply proposing, in addition to the 60 man DL, that players who have been declared out for the year can be placed on the DL in our league but would not be allowed to return to active status that year.  This won't affect 60 day DL players at all, it's merely an add on for players out for the season.  You wouldn't have to place him on the DL and lose him for the year, it would just be an option.  It makes no sense that a player out for the year can't be placed on our DL because his real life MLB team just has him on the 15 day DL. 

Either way, it's not a big deal.  Just something I felt was a hole in our rules. 
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

chrisetc21

  • Guest
Re: Rule Change Discussions
« Reply #26 on: August 28, 2016, 01:41:15 AM »
Average MLB team payrolls for the last few years.  We probably don't need the +5% provision.  As it stands, using the averages the cap would go up $17m. 

2016 - $142m
2015 - $135m
2014 - $121m
2013 - $111m
« Last Edit: August 28, 2016, 01:42:56 AM by chrisetc21 »
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline Jss0062

  • MVP
  • ****
  • Join Date: Sep 2013
  • Posts: 2533
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :DAL:
    • :SA:
    • :Blank:
    • :Texas:
    • View Profile
Re: Rule Change Discussions
« Reply #27 on: August 28, 2016, 01:20:13 PM »
Average MLB team payrolls for the last few years.  We probably don't need the +5% provision.  As it stands, using the averages the cap would go up $17m. 

2016 - $142m
2015 - $135m
2014 - $121m
2013 - $111m

Where did you pull those numbers?  Baseball Prospectus has these numbers
2016 - $130m
2015 - $125m
2014 - $115m
2013 - $106m

maybe you have year end numbers and these are opening day numbers
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

chrisetc21

  • Guest
Re: Rule Change Discussions
« Reply #28 on: August 28, 2016, 03:42:18 PM »
Where did you pull those numbers?  Baseball Prospectus has these numbers
2016 - $130m
2015 - $125m
2014 - $115m
2013 - $106m

maybe you have year end numbers and these are opening day numbers

They're year end from spotrac. 

http://www.spotrac.com/mlb/payroll/
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline Jss0062

  • MVP
  • ****
  • Join Date: Sep 2013
  • Posts: 2533
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :DAL:
    • :SA:
    • :Blank:
    • :Texas:
    • View Profile
Re: Rule Change Discussions
« Reply #29 on: August 28, 2016, 10:32:52 PM »
They're year end from spotrac. 

http://www.spotrac.com/mlb/payroll/

Would it not be better to use baseball pro since that's where our ARB numbers come from?
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

 

Forum Search


Quick Profile

 
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

* Chat Room

Refresh History
  • STLBlues91: I got a full set of picks this year that are movable
    June 06, 2024, 11:10:16 PM
  • Brent: I don't know anything about Hockey.
    June 06, 2024, 11:14:14 PM
  • Daddy: In what league?
    June 06, 2024, 11:14:24 PM
  • Daddy: @Brent you are a vet. Your skills will carry over.
    June 06, 2024, 11:14:54 PM
  • Daddy: Stats, age, contract, google.
    June 06, 2024, 11:15:12 PM
  • Daddy: You will be a playoff team just because you're one of the best "Dynasty Fantasy" GMs mother Earth has birthed.
    June 06, 2024, 11:16:11 PM
  • Daddy: I personally would welcome the challenge of learning an entirely new sport within the confounds of dynasty fantasy arena. Its fun and if you dont win at first so what.
    June 06, 2024, 11:17:50 PM
  • Brent: Yeah, that's why I took on the challenge.  I'll learn and figure out how I want to build this Predators team.
    June 06, 2024, 11:19:20 PM
  • Daddy: I like the Preds
    June 06, 2024, 11:19:43 PM
  • Daddy: You will love NHL LIVE i guarantee it. Wait till those bullets start getting fired.
    June 06, 2024, 11:20:30 PM
  • jmntl82: Kings are in the same boat, NHL is a new landscape for me to traverse
    June 06, 2024, 11:46:36 PM
  • indiansnation: Jmntl82 p!
    June 06, 2024, 11:48:57 PM
  • indiansnation: pm
    June 06, 2024, 11:49:03 PM
  • indiansnation: Hey guys rumor flying that their might be a new hockey league coming out.Major League Hockey (MLH) is determined to be the next big thing in the sport. Looking to launch in the fall of 2024, MLH is looking for early star power to give their league some buzz and legitimacy.
    Yesterday at 12:17:21 AM
  • Daddy: :rofl:
    Yesterday at 12:34:39 AM
  • BayAreaBallers: mlh is a 3 v3 version of nhl
    Yesterday at 12:35:42 AM
  • Daddy: :rofl:
    Yesterday at 12:36:49 AM
  • Daddy: They will go bankrupt after the first year :rofl: :rofl:
    Yesterday at 12:38:58 AM
  • Daddy: I bet this was Sidney Crosby's idea.
    Yesterday at 12:42:22 AM
  • Daddy: Fantrax offers the following options that support LIVE format Dynasty Sports.... Soccer, NASCAR, PGA, & believe it or not Formula One.
    Yesterday at 03:24:02 AM
  • Daddy: We are providing every other option across the 4 major sports.
    Yesterday at 03:25:10 AM
  • Daddy: If there is a demand. #LIVE will meet it. Site traffic is climbing. Site membership. Reputation. Interests. Its far from where it could be.
    Yesterday at 03:27:02 AM
  • Daddy: We are providing something nobody else is providing. Once these teams are gone... Grown Men throw public fits trying to get in. Yo... I aint lying.
    Yesterday at 03:29:02 AM
  • STLBlues91: Ill be around all day for any trade talks
    Yesterday at 01:45:38 PM
  • Daddy: NBA talking expansion now :rofl: multiple groups bidding in Las Vegas and Seattle's legislation has already approved a team once the Kraken came in.
    Yesterday at 06:49:07 PM
  • Daddy: Imagine that :rofl: :rofl:
    Yesterday at 06:49:28 PM
  • Daddy: They looking at 2 years before expansion. But its coming. Vegas has like 5 groups two of which plan to break ground on new venues. The expansion fee is expected to be north of 5 Billion $$
    Yesterday at 06:51:25 PM
  • Daddy: We did it here first. Remember that in two years when the NBA steals our Vegas name too ;)
    Yesterday at 06:52:13 PM
  • Rhino7: We need a royalty payment if they steal the Vipers name
    Yesterday at 08:54:14 PM
  • Daddy: Blues hasnt said he wants to keep that name.
    Yesterday at 10:35:01 PM
  • Daddy: He is taking this naming very seriously which i appreciate.
    Yesterday at 10:35:49 PM
  • Daddy: It has to be a blast being a new expansion team in an NBA Dynasty league.
    Yesterday at 10:36:19 PM
  • Daddy: Who has ever done that?
    Yesterday at 10:36:41 PM
  • STLBlues91: I have a list of names on my phone currently
    Yesterday at 10:36:42 PM
  • STLBlues91: May do a poll or something for the gms of the league
    Yesterday at 10:37:01 PM
  • Daddy: Vipers is ok but it doesn't say "Vegas" to me. There are more creative names to be sure.
    Yesterday at 10:39:01 PM
  • Daddy: I don't know that the other GMs will care so much as you or I. :)
    Yesterday at 10:39:49 PM
  • Alpha5: Las Vegas Realtors
    Yesterday at 10:40:23 PM
  • Daddy: Sure, throw some in the chat :rofl:
    Yesterday at 10:41:02 PM
  • dbreer23: Vegas Rat Pack
    Yesterday at 10:42:39 PM
  • Daddy: I like the Las Vegas Diamonds but i was saving that one for MLB LIVE expansion.
    Yesterday at 10:42:41 PM
  • STLBlues91: Legacy/Jokers/Sinners/Vengeance/Outlaws/Vipers/Vandals/Voodoo/have more but just threw out a couple I have written down
    Yesterday at 10:44:14 PM
  • Daddy: Las Vegas Diddlers (shout out to Bad Boy Records)
    Yesterday at 10:45:06 PM
  • Alpha5: Dammit
    Yesterday at 10:49:15 PM
  • Alpha5: Haha
    Yesterday at 10:49:19 PM
  • Alpha5: Las Vegas Impersonators
    Yesterday at 10:51:19 PM
  • Daddy: That long fuqn name? It would rap around they jerseys like a hula hoop.
    Yesterday at 10:52:48 PM
  • Daddy: Who you play for dawg?
    Yesterday at 10:54:07 PM
  • Daddy: "Uh.... We the imgddyojgsspersonators"
    Yesterday at 10:54:26 PM
  • Alpha5: Lolol
    Yesterday at 11:47:00 PM