Author Topic: Angels / White Sox Trade  (Read 597 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Maydab23

  • All-Star
  • ***
  • Join Date: Sep 2013
  • Posts: 2111
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :Blank:
    • :LAL:
    • :Blank:
    • :UCLA:
    • View Profile
Angels / White Sox Trade
« on: April 13, 2015, 02:20:00 PM »
:LAA: trade

Nick Williams
TiQuan Forbes
Nelson Gomez
Joantgel Segovia
Yoiber Marquina

:CHW: trade

OF Mookie Betts (400K)

« Last Edit: April 15, 2015, 03:25:56 AM by Jss0062 »
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline Maydab23

  • All-Star
  • ***
  • Join Date: Sep 2013
  • Posts: 2111
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :Blank:
    • :LAL:
    • :Blank:
    • :UCLA:
    • View Profile
Re: Angels / White Sox Trade
« Reply #1 on: April 13, 2015, 02:25:07 PM »
Angels approve.

It's hard giving up so many high upside prospects but the Angels are in win now mode and Betts gives some insurance against having Rusney Castillo as well. Mainly though it's about the fact I have always been a huge Betts fan and think he will have a great career. Thanks to :chw: for keeping the negotiations alive :toast:
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

ThePetis

  • Guest
Re: Angels / White Sox Trade
« Reply #2 on: April 13, 2015, 02:40:40 PM »
 :iatp:
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

haseloff

  • Guest
Re: Angels / White Sox Trade
« Reply #3 on: April 13, 2015, 03:14:00 PM »
 :iatp:
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline Jss0062

  • MVP
  • ****
  • Join Date: Sep 2013
  • Posts: 2533
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :DAL:
    • :SA:
    • :Blank:
    • :Texas:
    • View Profile
Re: Angels / White Sox Trade
« Reply #4 on: April 14, 2015, 01:13:51 AM »
I have vote to  :veto: this for the following reasons

1) The White Sox roster is already illegal under the rule requiring 10 players to be actively scoring points.  The 40man has 4, the organization has 6.  Draft picks will be lost because of this.
2) Betts is scoring better than 50% of CHWs points thus far.
3) The return to me is very iffy, Nick Williams is the only top 10 organizational player. Forbes and Segovia are huge risks and the other two are even greater.
4) I just don't think the White Sox have any need to further tear down the team to rebuild, a team still has to be fielded and again this goes the wrong direction.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

mgzd

  • Guest
Re: Angels / White Sox Trade
« Reply #5 on: April 14, 2015, 01:23:49 AM »
We confirm the deal and are quite enthusiastic receiving 5 prospects for Betts.
If he had remained a MI instead of OFer, probably wouldn't have made the deal.
I understand Jss0062 questioning the deal, but it's just like the real life re-builders.
Just think, a Royals/Pirates World Series? Those re-builders may finally get to the pinnacle!
It may take 3-6 years, but we have a plan!
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline chriscvc

  • All-Star
  • ***
  • Join Date: Mar 2014
  • Posts: 1585
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :PIT-NFL:
    • :SA:
    • :Blank:
    • :Cincinnati:
    • View Profile
Re: Angels / White Sox Trade
« Reply #6 on: April 14, 2015, 10:14:11 AM »
I think I have to  :veto:

Segovia/Marquina are one of a million above average players in the rookie leagues, can be found on the waivers even in a league this deep.

Gomez is a bit higher level than them due to being a big bonus IFA, but high risk and at this point should not be a main piece for any major deal.

That leaves Williams/Forbes to make up the majority value for Betts. I'm a Rangers fan who really wants to believe in both of them but I can't imagine many scenarios where they even get to half the value of Betts.

I understand White Sox are rebuilding, but Betts is the type of player a rebuilding team needs not more prospects. Even if you think it'll be 3-4 years until you compete Betts will still be around for that team it's not like he's in the decline phase of his career.

All of this is before accounting for the lost draft picks for making your roster even more illegal, I just can't imagine the White Sox coming ahead in any scenario.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline ldsjayhawk

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2011
  • Posts: 9987
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :CLS:
    • :Kansas:
    • :SKC:
    • :KC:
    • View Profile
Re: Angels / White Sox Trade
« Reply #7 on: April 14, 2015, 03:03:12 PM »
 :veto:

Trades shouldn't be allowed that break the rules.

Quote
1) The White Sox roster is already illegal under the rule requiring 10 players to be actively scoring points.  The 40man has 4, the organization has 6.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
FGM :win: :SEA: 2017 + 2x AL West Div
BUSH AL :Bronze: :KC: 2021 + 4x AL Central Div
AFB AL :Bronze: :KC: 2012 + 1x Div
AFB NL :Bronze: :COL: 2018 + 2x Div

haseloff

  • Guest
Re: Angels / White Sox Trade
« Reply #8 on: April 14, 2015, 04:00:51 PM »
I was unaware of the rules issues with this trade.  :NYM: now veto.  :veto:
:veto:

Trades shouldn't be allowed that break the rules.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline Jss0062

  • MVP
  • ****
  • Join Date: Sep 2013
  • Posts: 2533
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :DAL:
    • :SA:
    • :Blank:
    • :Texas:
    • View Profile
Re: Angels / White Sox Trade
« Reply #9 on: April 15, 2015, 03:31:54 AM »
3 Vetoes means the trade is dead.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

 

Forum Search


Quick Profile

 
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

* Chat Room

Refresh History
  • Daddy: Was a bitch :rofl:
    Yesterday at 05:01:10 PM
  • Daddy: I know about 16 year old hockey players now. It was a great learning experience. I thought i knew hockey.
    Yesterday at 05:03:59 PM
  • Daddy: Huge NHL LIVE trade. The first BLOCKBUSTER
    Yesterday at 05:59:00 PM
  • Daddy: Connor McDavid comes to Broad St. :)
    Yesterday at 05:59:23 PM
  • Daddy: Lead us great Connor. Lead us to Dynasty Glory. :win: im counting on you eh.
    Yesterday at 06:00:31 PM
  • Bigdon: Nba live i.have chicago that's awesome thanks
    Yesterday at 06:02:13 PM
  • indiansnation: Daddy its 5pm and the flyers still suck
    Yesterday at 06:02:47 PM
  • Daddy: Yeah but my Flyers suck with Connor McDavid.
    Yesterday at 06:04:15 PM
  • Daddy: Dont hate me cuz im beautiful.
    Yesterday at 06:04:34 PM
  • Daddy: After a blockbuster trade, you know the feeling. I could get hit by thrown monkey poop right now and im still smiling while i eat a banana.
    Yesterday at 06:06:48 PM
  • Daddy: Who you got? Isnt Sidney Crosby coaching team Canada in the upcoming Olympics?
    Yesterday at 06:07:44 PM
  • Daddy: Ever seen Harlem Knights Brian? "" Dddddon't ttttake thththis Aaaaasssss whupin Ppppersonal" -Jack Jenkins
    Yesterday at 06:12:51 PM
  • Daddy: [link] for you. :)
    Yesterday at 06:14:34 PM
  • STLBlues91: @Daddy can you check the message I just sent. Quick question
    Yesterday at 09:14:25 PM
  • Daddy: Replied
    Yesterday at 09:48:39 PM
  • Daddy: If members do not mind, deleting old pms helps the site run smoother and keeps your pms organized.
    Yesterday at 10:07:23 PM
  • Daddy: Nobody gets more pms than i do. I stay deleting and still have pages and pages of pms
    Yesterday at 10:08:11 PM
  • Daddy: Its not required that you delete old news but its also not required you delete and spam emails. Same thing. Thanks!
    Yesterday at 10:09:35 PM
  • Daddy: If anyone wants one of these premium Flyers prospects, send me more pms to eventually delete. NFL/MLB/NHL you're welcome. On to the next LIVE chapters.
    Yesterday at 10:11:42 PM
  • STLBlues91: Thank you for the Prune message sections.
    Yesterday at 10:20:33 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: Yepp that was an easy axe of messages
    Yesterday at 10:53:25 PM
  • STLBlues91: I did happen to select 225 pages before I saw that option though
    Yesterday at 10:55:07 PM
  • Daddy: Man you had 225 pages? Damn. Im down to 12.
    Yesterday at 11:48:59 PM
  • Daddy: Some of them i have to keep.
    Yesterday at 11:49:25 PM
  • STLBlues91: I had 465 but I clicked 225 pages worth of messages before I found the prune option
    Yesterday at 11:50:01 PM
  • Daddy: Thats a ton of trade talks. You just recently became a moderator. Being a mod we communicate tons via pm.
    Yesterday at 11:50:51 PM
  • Daddy: Your 465 pages was 400+ of trade negotiations. In pages containing 20 threads each. . :rofl:
    Yesterday at 11:52:00 PM
  • STLBlues91: Yeah I talk a lot of players and deals
    Yesterday at 11:52:10 PM
  • STLBlues91: And the other 65 were draft reminders and otc messages
    Yesterday at 11:52:50 PM
  • Daddy: I bet you pruned some moderator Crap :rofl: some of them you have to keep.
    Yesterday at 11:52:59 PM
  • Daddy: I always resend the important stuff.
    Yesterday at 11:53:35 PM
  • STLBlues91: No I kept all messages within like 80 days
    Yesterday at 11:53:36 PM
  • STLBlues91: Yeah you got it all anyway. Im just here to type and plug in numbers
    Yesterday at 11:54:07 PM
  • Daddy: There is a new NCAA football team. TCU in the house.
    Yesterday at 11:54:29 PM
  • STLBlues91: When does NCAA open and all that
    Yesterday at 11:55:15 PM
  • Daddy: NFL LIVE just added another all star level GM. We are getting him up to speed. No not the one in Detroit.
    Yesterday at 11:55:31 PM
  • Daddy: July 1st
    Yesterday at 11:55:43 PM
  • Daddy: Where are we at? Somewhere around 50 teams i think. We have 64 but bringing them onboard profsl is a challenge.
    Yesterday at 11:56:38 PM
  • STLBlues91: Well Ill get to work more on that spread sheet like June 10th. Finishing touches on NHL then a few days off then will knock that out
    Yesterday at 11:56:47 PM
  • Daddy: So much easier. No contracts. No trades.
    Yesterday at 11:58:32 PM
  • jmntl82: I can’t stand the Detroit GM
    Yesterday at 11:59:19 PM
  • jmntl82: Keeps me up at night
    Yesterday at 11:59:34 PM
  • STLBlues91: Yeah the colors will take a bit as I find the rbg codes and thats 64 teams. I can copy and paste the makeup. Then just to plug in the players
    Today at 12:07:48 AM
  • BayAreaBallers: Is he taking over the jags team?
    Today at 12:20:40 AM
  • Daddy: Jags have two owners
    Today at 12:24:18 AM
  • Daddy: @Vik has been put on wait list and has already been replaced. The GM directory is updated.
    Today at 12:25:13 AM
  • Daddy: This owner is in Carolina.
    Today at 12:25:40 AM
  • Daddy: iRunFreeman recruited from off-site.
    Today at 12:27:44 AM
  • Daddy: Weve probably got 20 or so people that we just have to get on profsl then get them up to speed on how we post because everything is old school here
    Today at 12:29:27 AM
  • jmntl82: Im glad someone else said that, when I joined armchair I was so lost on here
    Today at 12:40:48 AM