Author Topic: Questions  (Read 98600 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline favo_zomg

  • MVP
  • ****
  • Join Date: Feb 2011
  • Posts: 3042
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :PHI-NHL:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: Questions
« Reply #250 on: March 30, 2013, 09:07:14 AM »
That is a great question. I think the higher seed should get the win. IMO

I don't like that... It gives an unfair advantage to the teams that finished higher in the standings.

I think we should do it with stats. For example, Team A has 6 goals this week while his opponent, Team B, has 13 goals this week. Thus, Team B wins that stat. The team that wins the most stats wins the round.

If you count shut outs, we have 15 total stats that could help determine the winner.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline Tony

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2011
  • Posts: 11708
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
  • I like hockey Eh!
    • :BUF:
    • :Blank:
    • :EDM:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: Questions
« Reply #251 on: March 30, 2013, 02:03:28 PM »
I don't like that... It gives an unfair advantage to the teams that finished higher in the standings.

I think we should do it with stats. For example, Team A has 6 goals this week while his opponent, Team B, has 13 goals this week. Thus, Team B wins that stat. The team that wins the most stats wins the round.

If you count shut outs, we have 15 total stats that could help determine the winner.
Higher seeded teams should have the advantage.

Also you could still have teams that tie in the stats department as well.


Just my opinion.  :thumbsup:
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
:SC-NHL: :SC-NHL: :SC-NHL: :SC-NHL: :SC-NHL:   2011-12, 2012-13, 2013-14, 2014-15, 2016-17 Backyard NHL Stanley Cup Champion :CHI-NHL:

 2013-14  NHL Invitational Stanley Cup Champion :PIT-NHL:

Offline favo_zomg

  • MVP
  • ****
  • Join Date: Feb 2011
  • Posts: 3042
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :PHI-NHL:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: Questions
« Reply #252 on: March 30, 2013, 03:04:24 PM »
Higher seeded teams should have the advantage.

Also you could still have teams that tie in the stats department as well.


Just my opinion.  :thumbsup:

Maybe we can pick 5 to 7 stats to determine the tie instead. Either way, I feel as though giving the higher seeded teams that advantage is unfair, and this is coming from a team that is currently sitting 2nd. With the exception of seeding, I feel that basing anything else in the playoffs based on how you did in the regular season is an unfair advantage. Match ups should be about that week.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline Drew

  • Forum Administrator
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2010
  • Posts: 18307
  • Bonus inPoints: 80
  • Forum Administrator
    • :TEN:
    • :BOS-NBA:
    • :EDM:
    • :Clemson:
    • :TOR:
    • View Profile
Re: Re: Questions
« Reply #253 on: March 30, 2013, 08:56:32 PM »
Maybe we can pick 5 to 7 stats to determine the tie instead. Either way, I feel as though giving the higher seeded teams that advantage is unfair, and this is coming from a team that is currently sitting 2nd. With the exception of seeding, I feel that basing anything else in the playoffs based on how you did in the regular season is an unfair advantage. Match ups should be about that week.
Hoping that there is no ties in playoffs. Haha.
But I'll have to see what is in rules but I think regular season is an important factor.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Drew's Bio & Trophy Case



You miss 100% of the shots you don't take. - "Wayne Gretzky"

Offline nelly85

  • All-Star
  • ***
  • Join Date: Apr 2011
  • Posts: 1369
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :GB:
    • :Blank:
    • :VAN:
    • :Blank:
    • :Portugal:
    • View Profile
Re: Questions
« Reply #254 on: March 30, 2013, 11:09:53 PM »
Maybe we can pick 5 to 7 stats to determine the tie instead. Either way, I feel as though giving the higher seeded teams that advantage is unfair, and this is coming from a team that is currently sitting 2nd. With the exception of seeding, I feel that basing anything else in the playoffs based on how you did in the regular season is an unfair advantage. Match ups should be about that week.

 :iatp: I don't think we should give a win based on the person had a better season many factors injuries ect it's unfair in my opion it should be based on the week why not do wht the invatastional tournament did use stats like g/ga/a/sv/hits/blk/ and a point for each and the winner in most categories should get the win I think this would be more fair for every team and not on bc they higher seed team. It's weekly match ups should be based on the week
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline norrya66

  • MVP
  • ****
  • Join Date: Feb 2012
  • Posts: 3292
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :DET-NFL:
    • :Blank:
    • :WAS-NHL:
    • :PennState:
    • View Profile
Re: Questions
« Reply #255 on: March 31, 2013, 01:18:20 PM »
:iatp: I don't think we should give a win based on the person had a better season many factors injuries ect it's unfair in my opion it should be based on the week why not do wht the invatastional tournament did use stats like g/ga/a/sv/hits/blk/ and a point for each and the winner in most categories should get the win I think this would be more fair for every team and not on bc they higher seed team. It's weekly match ups should be based on the week

 :iatp:
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
:win:  2013-14 NHL Casino Champion

Offline Tony

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2011
  • Posts: 11708
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
  • I like hockey Eh!
    • :BUF:
    • :Blank:
    • :EDM:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: Re: Questions
« Reply #256 on: March 31, 2013, 02:30:37 PM »
But I'll have to see what is in rules but I think regular season is an important factor.
:iatp:

funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
:SC-NHL: :SC-NHL: :SC-NHL: :SC-NHL: :SC-NHL:   2011-12, 2012-13, 2013-14, 2014-15, 2016-17 Backyard NHL Stanley Cup Champion :CHI-NHL:

 2013-14  NHL Invitational Stanley Cup Champion :PIT-NHL:

Tyler

  • Guest
Re: Questions
« Reply #257 on: April 01, 2013, 08:56:00 AM »
IMO regular season should count as a factor because it shows the best true reflection of a team and a GM and what that GM can do with the team regardless of injuries etc. 1 lucky week in the playoffs can happen, but no one gets lucky for an entire season.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

yahoolando

  • Guest
Re: Questions
« Reply #258 on: April 01, 2013, 12:50:06 PM »
Goals are the heaviest weighted stat worth 2 points and should be used in determining the winner.  Use the most goals and if is still a tie then go to Assists and if its still a tie then take the higher seed.

funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline Drew

  • Forum Administrator
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2010
  • Posts: 18307
  • Bonus inPoints: 80
  • Forum Administrator
    • :TEN:
    • :BOS-NBA:
    • :EDM:
    • :Clemson:
    • :TOR:
    • View Profile
Re: Questions
« Reply #259 on: April 02, 2013, 02:19:22 AM »
Standings Tie Breakers
1. Most fantasy points for entire season
2. Head-to-head record
3. Least fantasy points against for entire season

So I will go with this:
1. Head-to-head record
2. Higher Seed

I hope everyone is fine with this, regular season does matter or else we wouldn't play the games, it is very important where you place and how well you perform during the season. Head to head is the only transferable tie breaker so it gets the first spot. Again hopefully there is no ties and maybe this is something we can look into in the off-season.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Drew's Bio & Trophy Case



You miss 100% of the shots you don't take. - "Wayne Gretzky"

 

Forum Search


Quick Profile

 
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

* Chat Room

Refresh History
  • Jwalkerjr88: 3 out of the 4 starting QBs in the title games have been traded this offseason
    Yesterday at 11:14:21 PM
  • Daddy: I think i had him on a prospect deal.
    Yesterday at 11:14:22 PM
  • Daddy: It helps just to fill up your roster and sign good contracts. If you dont know crap but keep a full roster and manage finances, you will kick ass.
    Yesterday at 11:15:26 PM
  • Daddy: I wasnt a genius signing Kuechel. I was just filling an empty spot. I got rewarded with the best pitcher in baseball for a few seasons.
    Yesterday at 11:16:59 PM
  • Braves155: I love it when one of your Dynasty teams you've been rebuilding starts showing up and being competitive early in the season. Especially in baseball
    Yesterday at 11:19:42 PM
  • Brent: Agreed.  I'm decent at building, but I need to get better st winning.  I did win an offsite 32-team football league, it only took me 1.5 season to rebuild and win.
    Yesterday at 11:25:50 PM
  • Daddy: Thats what you should be doing @Brent. LIVE sharpens those skills so you can go elsewhere and dominate unsuspecting leagues.
    Today at 12:01:29 AM
  • Daddy: I use the same screen name on every site. So the sites I'm visiting/competing, know who is putting foots to them.
    Today at 12:02:47 AM
  • Daddy: And they know where they can find me. Along with the growing list of LIVE GMs who would put more foots to them.
    Today at 12:03:48 AM
  • Daddy: If "Daddy" appears on your site. He wears a size 13 and you know it.
    Today at 12:04:44 AM
  • indiansnation: Braves155 pm
    Today at 09:13:06 AM
  • Brent: Driving to Disney today.  I'll check PMs when I can.
    Today at 10:00:49 AM
  • Braves155: Responded indiansnation
    Today at 11:01:14 AM
  • indiansnation: Jealker pm
    Today at 11:19:23 AM
  • Jwalkerjr88: Back brian
    Today at 11:20:22 AM
  • indiansnation: Jwalker pm
    Today at 11:20:55 AM
  • indiansnation: Jimw pm
    Today at 11:50:01 AM
  • indiansnation: Back at u jwalker
    Today at 11:50:44 AM
  • Daddy: NFL trades never seem to stop.
    Today at 12:59:59 PM
  • indiansnation: Jimw pm
    Today at 01:26:00 PM
  • indiansnation: Colts looking for a couple te and starting rb in nfl live
    Today at 01:27:34 PM
  • indiansnation: Willing to move draft picks in right deal for starting te and starting rb
    Today at 01:42:27 PM
  • Braves155: MLB LIVE - If anyone has a decent 3B they'll deal, hmu.
    Today at 01:57:55 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: MLB LIVE the giants have struck a deal w the padres
    Today at 02:22:22 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: which is nowposted
    Today at 02:22:29 PM
  • STLBlues91: Ill be around the rest of the day for any talks
    Today at 02:26:26 PM
  • Daddy: Blues pm
    Today at 02:56:24 PM
  • Daddy: Congratulations to all you guys finding and making all these trades in both NFL & MLB
    Today at 02:56:48 PM
  • Daddy: Yall keep an old man busy thats for sure
    Today at 02:57:02 PM
  • Daddy: Trade talks for breakfast are nice. There are more talks than deals and look at the deals.
    Today at 02:58:59 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: i love it dealing for a position that tends to be scarce in mlb is huge
    Today at 03:05:52 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: especially in LIVE
    Today at 03:06:00 PM
  • Daddy: Trade talks heated up in NFL out of the blue. Its surprising to trade all year round in football.
    Today at 03:07:41 PM
  • Daddy: MLB i get it. Its an active ongoing season.
    Today at 03:08:13 PM
  • Daddy: The NBA, NHL & especially NFL. To have that kind of momentum is encouraging.
    Today at 03:09:01 PM
  • indiansnation: Jwalker pm
    Today at 03:11:04 PM
  • indiansnation: Jimw pm
    Today at 03:11:08 PM
  • Braves155: Willing to take offers on Giolito in MLB LIVE if anyone interested in him for prospects
    Today at 03:14:33 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: Back brian
    Today at 03:26:29 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: Back again
    Today at 03:35:12 PM
  • Daddy: This is crazy. Im trying to set up this basketball league but trade trade trade pms all over. Its a good problem to have. Who is making the next deal???
    Today at 03:35:19 PM
  • Braves155: I'm around for talks all today
    Today at 03:39:55 PM
  • Daddy: @Braves is always looking. Aint worried about you answering pms.
    Today at 03:42:15 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: Back to you as well @Braves. Missed your latest pm
    Today at 03:45:31 PM
  • Braves155: Replied Jwalker
    Today at 04:04:49 PM
  • STLBlues91: Sorry had lunch real quick replying to all now
    Today at 04:10:05 PM
  • indiansnation: Stlblues91 pm
    Today at 04:12:31 PM
  • indiansnation: Braves155 pm
    Today at 04:19:06 PM
  • indiansnation: Colts looking to move 2 1st rd picks and a 2nd rd pick in 2025  for a starting rb and starting te
    Today at 04:22:16 PM
  • Daddy: ^^what he said
    Today at 04:24:45 PM