Author Topic: Questions  (Read 98349 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline SlackJack

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2012
  • Posts: 5156
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
  • Director of Media Relations
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :PHI-NHL:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: Questions
« Reply #550 on: June 02, 2017, 09:37:07 PM »
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
:SC-NHL: :SC-NHL: :SC-NHL: :SC-NHL:  2015-16, 2017-18, 2018-19, 2019-20 Backyard NHL Stanley Cup Champion :STL-NHL:

Offline Tony

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2011
  • Posts: 11708
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
  • I like hockey Eh!
    • :BUF:
    • :Blank:
    • :EDM:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: Questions
« Reply #551 on: June 03, 2017, 12:07:57 AM »
« Last Edit: June 03, 2017, 12:13:07 AM by Tony »
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
:SC-NHL: :SC-NHL: :SC-NHL: :SC-NHL: :SC-NHL:   2011-12, 2012-13, 2013-14, 2014-15, 2016-17 Backyard NHL Stanley Cup Champion :CHI-NHL:

 2013-14  NHL Invitational Stanley Cup Champion :PIT-NHL:

Offline whiteghost

  • All-Star
  • ***
  • Join Date: Dec 2013
  • Posts: 1142
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :GB:
    • :MEM:
    • :VAN:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: Questions
« Reply #552 on: June 04, 2017, 07:47:58 PM »
Hey, just wondering about extensions....as I read the rules, you use the highest point total from the past two years (and consider all potential positions). Has there been any thought or discussion given to using an average of the past couple of years? I just wonder as it would give a more accurate in the case of injury, etc. Not trying to be the guy who comes late to the party and wants to turn over the tables, just curious...
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline favo_zomg

  • MVP
  • ****
  • Join Date: Feb 2011
  • Posts: 3042
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :PHI-NHL:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: Questions
« Reply #553 on: June 14, 2017, 09:38:01 AM »
So when are we doing extensions and entry draft?
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline Drew

  • Forum Administrator
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2010
  • Posts: 18307
  • Bonus inPoints: 80
  • Forum Administrator
    • :TEN:
    • :BOS-NBA:
    • :EDM:
    • :Clemson:
    • :TOR:
    • View Profile
Re: Questions
« Reply #554 on: June 15, 2017, 12:51:33 PM »
Hey, just wondering about extensions....as I read the rules, you use the highest point total from the past two years (and consider all potential positions). Has there been any thought or discussion given to using an average of the past couple of years? I just wonder as it would give a more accurate in the case of injury, etc. Not trying to be the guy who comes late to the party and wants to turn over the tables, just curious...
We haven't had much discussion on that because in all honesty it has never been an issue through the entirety of the league. Usually a good player doesn't have 2 bad back to back seasons and if they do, we may not consider them good anymore. As for injuries, it levels out the rise to re-sign them if you are getting them cheap due to injury, it may just happen again. Anyone else have comments on this?
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Drew's Bio & Trophy Case



You miss 100% of the shots you don't take. - "Wayne Gretzky"

Offline Rob

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2010
  • Posts: 19222
  • Bonus inPoints: 3
    • :NE:
    • :BOS-NBA:
    • :BOS-NHL:
    • :NewHampshire:
    • :NER:
    • :BOS:
    • View Profile
Re: Questions
« Reply #555 on: June 15, 2017, 01:03:21 PM »
We haven't had much discussion on that because in all honesty it has never been an issue through the entirety of the league. Usually a good player doesn't have 2 bad back to back seasons and if they do, we may not consider them good anymore. As for injuries, it levels out the rise to re-sign them if you are getting them cheap due to injury, it may just happen again. Anyone else have comments on this?

I like how we do it now for 2 reasons:

1) You cannot get a discount on a Stamkos-like talent where he goes down for a year with injury.  High end talent costs high end dollars, regardless of an injury OR off year.

2) Ease of use.  This has to be a factor.  This would add another variable to the extension equation, which is more work for us and for the league management.  Since I run my own league, I'm particularly sensitive about the management side.  Auditing extensions is one of the most time consuming parts of running a league like this.  Adding this element means more time spent on administration for Drew.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline Rob

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2010
  • Posts: 19222
  • Bonus inPoints: 3
    • :NE:
    • :BOS-NBA:
    • :BOS-NHL:
    • :NewHampshire:
    • :NER:
    • :BOS:
    • View Profile
Re: Questions
« Reply #556 on: June 15, 2017, 01:09:19 PM »
However, on this topic, I would like to again suggest a minimum extension length that depends on the value of the contract.  There's currently very little incentive to signing players longterm.  High value contracts should carry a certain minimum length.  Look at Seguin, for example, I re-signed him for 2 years at $7.5m.  That should have been a minimum 5 year contract length IMO. 

Here's how I handle it in my league:

Quote
Contract Limits
Except for any contract inherited in 2011, all contracts must be no longer than five years. Also, for a given salary, all contracts have term limits (max years contract can be per the yearly salary) as provided below.

Salary - Max Years
$5m+ - 5 years (the overall limit)
$3.5 to $4.9m - 4 years
$2 to $3.4m - 3 years
$0 to $1.9m - 2 years

Contract Limits for Extensions
Contract extensions follow the contract maximum lengths as shown above as well as their own minimum standards.

Salary - Min & Max Years
$6.5m+ - 5 years (the overall limit)
$5 to $6.4m - 4 or 5 years
$3.5 to $4.9m - 3 or 4 years
$2 to $3.4m - 2 or 3 years
$0 to $1.9m - 1 or 2 years
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline SlackJack

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2012
  • Posts: 5156
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
  • Director of Media Relations
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :PHI-NHL:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: Questions
« Reply #557 on: June 15, 2017, 08:20:12 PM »
Quote
However, on this topic, I would like to again suggest a minimum extension length that depends on the value of the contract.  There's currently very little incentive to signing players longterm.  High value contracts should carry a certain minimum length.  Look at Seguin, for example, I re-signed him for 2 years at $7.5m.  That should have been a minimum 5 year contract length IMO.

Backyard's contract structure has been working nicely years. It is the differences between leagues that makes them special.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
:SC-NHL: :SC-NHL: :SC-NHL: :SC-NHL:  2015-16, 2017-18, 2018-19, 2019-20 Backyard NHL Stanley Cup Champion :STL-NHL:

Offline Drew

  • Forum Administrator
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2010
  • Posts: 18307
  • Bonus inPoints: 80
  • Forum Administrator
    • :TEN:
    • :BOS-NBA:
    • :EDM:
    • :Clemson:
    • :TOR:
    • View Profile
Re: Questions
« Reply #558 on: June 16, 2017, 12:17:53 PM »
However, on this topic, I would like to again suggest a minimum extension length that depends on the value of the contract.  There's currently very little incentive to signing players longterm.  High value contracts should carry a certain minimum length.  Look at Seguin, for example, I re-signed him for 2 years at $7.5m.  That should have been a minimum 5 year contract length IMO. 

Here's how I handle it in my league:
Could be something for discussion, we had it this way in the beginning and changed it to how it is now. Maybe somehow this could be worked into RFA style rule? If you sign a player under the max then they are place on an "RFA" where their next contract would have to be the max years?

Just food for thought.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Drew's Bio & Trophy Case



You miss 100% of the shots you don't take. - "Wayne Gretzky"

Offline Rob

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2010
  • Posts: 19222
  • Bonus inPoints: 3
    • :NE:
    • :BOS-NBA:
    • :BOS-NHL:
    • :NewHampshire:
    • :NER:
    • :BOS:
    • View Profile
Re: Questions
« Reply #559 on: June 16, 2017, 12:24:10 PM »
Could be something for discussion, we had it this way in the beginning and changed it to how it is now. Maybe somehow this could be worked into RFA style rule? If you sign a player under the max then they are place on an "RFA" where their next contract would have to be the max years?

Just food for thought.

I like that idea.  Or if you don't sign a certain quality player to the max then they can't be extended again and become a UFA at the end of the contract.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

 

Forum Search


Quick Profile

 
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

* Chat Room

Refresh History
  • Daddy: In my experience there is always "someone" that should be booted. They dont get booted because most leagues struggle at filling membership. NFL LIVE is so popular i could legit have an NFL LIVE 2 and it would be filled instantly.
    Today at 03:12:51 PM
  • Daddy: Doing that would diminish what NFL LIVE is. Which is why we created NCAA. NCAA supports those wanting an NFL LIVE franchise but cannot get in because we have franchise "holding" GMs.
    Today at 03:14:31 PM
  • Daddy: A "holding" GM is barely active. Never has a chance to win it all and responds to pms from peers after weeks or even months.
    Today at 03:15:24 PM
  • Daddy: If someone wins a 64 team LIVE league. NCAA or not. As hard as it is to win a LIVE league. And we gave all 32 NFL LIVE GMs the chance to win that very same league. Then hell yes. If need be. Some 2-15 GM or likewise that we KNOW isnt doing all they can to get better will be in jeopardy of being replaced.
    Today at 03:17:41 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: essentially this is a feeder for the NFL NBA. gives gusy a chance to prove they can be active and at least do whats needed so that they are considered for nba and nfl live leagues
    Today at 03:19:29 PM
  • Daddy: These leagues arent created and paid for so people can hold them and not do Crap. The purpose is to have the best Dynasty GMs in the world test themselves on an even and realistic playing field. You win a LIVE league. You are a made Man. Period.
    Today at 03:19:48 PM
  • Daddy: @BAB exactly. They are feeder leagues.
    Today at 03:20:05 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: with it being 64 ppl the talent pool for possible replacmenets is high
    Today at 03:21:01 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: and gives you enough to assess
    Today at 03:21:13 PM
  • Daddy: The NCAA League concepts are much simpler. No trading in college. Its recruit, set lineups and go. But the recruiting is essential to winning. A dummy wont win. No dummy will ever win LIVE. Cant luck into it.
    Today at 03:23:24 PM
  • Daddy: And
    Today at 03:23:29 PM
  • Daddy: Im in those leagues. Nobody wins a league im in by luck. They either had some kind of headstart or advantage. But talk smack if you want, if youve been in a league with me, you know wassup. Im bringing the hammer win lose or draw.
    Today at 03:24:52 PM
  • Daddy: Win a LIVE League. You beat me fair in square. Win NFL/NBA LIVE you not only beat me, you beat @jwalkerjr88 and my Son is even better than me. (Damn)
    Today at 03:27:58 PM
  • Daddy: And youve beaten the 30 best other guys i could get.
    Today at 03:28:54 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: yeah cann tell you this in nfl live u were not easy to beat
    Today at 03:31:51 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: but the one time i did was in the nfc championship
    Today at 03:32:08 PM
  • Daddy: @Brent,@OUDAN,@Rhino7,@IndianaBuc,@STLBlues91,@DaveW,@ldsjayhawks,@LockednLoaded & his Sons,@Harman,@BAB the list goes on and on and on. Look at those GMs. @kylerap@Sky@indiansnation look at the hockey guys, the basketball guys signing up.
    Today at 03:33:02 PM
  • Daddy: We playin games (dynasty fantasy) but we aint playin no games when it comes to competition and winning. WE DA BEST. Its not hype. Its not talk
    Today at 03:34:10 PM
  • Daddy: Its fact
    Today at 03:34:18 PM
  • Daddy: If ol jwalkerjr88 were in MLB LIVE he wouldn't be tolerating that Canadian Dirty Bird Crap. Someone needs to stop Toronto.
    Today at 03:43:21 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: im coming
    Today at 03:44:15 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: for mlb
    Today at 03:44:25 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: that team is now in great position like nfl i s
    Today at 03:44:37 PM
  • Daddy: I see ya. You take crap teams and turn them into contenders in one or two years. You are ELITE at this Crap.
    Today at 03:46:08 PM
  • Daddy: If a person wins NCAA LIVE or NCAA hoops LIVE & they arent in NFL or NBA LIVE, they will be.
    Today at 03:47:23 PM
  • Daddy: If they want to be.
    Today at 03:48:16 PM
  • Daddy: LIVE Champions are VIP in my book. They get whatever they want. Ask Buc.
    Today at 03:48:50 PM
  • Daddy: Guys like @Braves have nothing to worry about. That guy is pitting in the work. He has the room to learn at his own pace.
    Today at 03:50:20 PM
  • Daddy: Those GMs that are just "holding" teams. They know who they are.
    Today at 03:50:53 PM
  • Daddy: Get busy trying to win or get busy on your PlayStation or some other Crap.
    Today at 03:51:27 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: the only team that still needs more work is ccd
    Today at 03:54:25 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: its getting theee
    Today at 03:54:30 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: there
    Today at 03:54:33 PM
  • jimw: @Daddy thanks for the baseball complement, but don't sleep on the Seahawks. I got Stroud and Bijan in draft and have lots of picks
    Today at 04:02:59 PM
  • Brent: Those are two studs for sure.
    Today at 04:06:51 PM
  • Daddy: @JimW agreed. You have acquired big chips to have a seat at the table.
    Today at 04:10:08 PM
  • Daddy: LIVE was created so GMs can cook. Show your talent in this space. Lots of people talk :blah: and there are a lot of leagues and sites out there. Aint none of them got our product. Are you a good fantasy GM? A great one? Why? What made you good/great?
    Today at 04:16:10 PM
  • Daddy: Cuz you won a couple leagues full of non competitive dudes or inactive teams? Duplicate teams where guys run more than one franchise eliminating true balance? How do you KNOW you're good?
    Today at 04:17:36 PM
  • Daddy: I guess because you say so.
    Today at 04:17:48 PM
  • Daddy: No need to prove it. Live in your own space where you are King. Like Franchise mode on your XBox.
    Today at 04:19:53 PM
  • Daddy: You da man on franchise mode i bet
    Today at 04:20:13 PM
  • Daddy: So... Why are you here
    Today at 04:22:14 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: There are some intriguing builds in nfl live that im watching to see how they blossom. Some guys who have been in the league for awhile. Show us something!
    Today at 04:57:04 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: Jimw is top of that list. Stroud and Bijan are two of the best cornerstone pieces you can own. Lets see what you do to ut
    Today at 04:57:48 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: *it
    Today at 04:57:51 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: Jwalk100 and the Jets. Im watching
    Today at 04:58:29 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: Mt_Crushmore joined only recently and hes done alot with them steelers
    Today at 04:58:55 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: @TheGoat what them falcons gonna do?
    Today at 04:59:13 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: @Thetitan packers?
    Today at 04:59:21 PM
  • indiansnation: Brent pm
    Today at 05:02:17 PM