Copying exact same reasoning from original deal, as the addition of 2nd still don't justify it for me:
Sorry guys, I hate to do this but don't think this sets a good precedent. I paid more for Klay Thompson with less money paid. Thompson should still be good and fits what I want to do, but still Curry significantly more valuable and getting sold for a fair bit less.
The 1st is not even a high 1st so just can't justify this being the price for what is still arguably a top 5 player with 30m paid this year.
It's a new league and don't take vetoing lightly but do have to put this out there.