Author Topic: POLL: Add clarifying clause to our rules governing Prospect Extensions  (Read 2396 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Flash

  • *ProFSL Staff
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2010
  • Posts: 23232
  • Bonus inPoints: 319
    • :SFO:
    • :GS:
    • :SJ:
    • :California:
    • :UnitedStates:
    • :SF:
    • View Profile
Our rules governing Prospect Extensions are a little ambiguous at the moment.  You can review our rules as presently written at this link:

http://www.profsl.com/smf/index.php?topic=176015.msg844709#msg844709

I am offering this poll to our league members in an attempt to get some clarification for future extensions.  The clause you are voting on is utilized in Franchise GM and works quite well.  As a member of that league, everyone has a clear understanding of when the extensions will go into effect because it stipulates a particular timeline.  Our rules do not have such a stipulation, and therefore, it is subject to interpretation. 

I fully support the implementation of the rule.  No comment is required, but please offer one if you believe it helps clarify your vote.
« Last Edit: December 28, 2014, 06:25:47 PM by Flash »
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
🏆 2021 FGM World Series Champion - :SF:
🏆 2017 WCB2 World Series Champion - :SD:
🏆 2021 BSN Football Mt West Champion :UNLV:
🏆 2021 BSN Football Big 10 Champion -  :Nebraska:
🏆 2021 BSN Football Pac-12 Champion :California:

Offline Alex87878

  • All-Star
  • ***
  • Join Date: Feb 2014
  • Posts: 1422
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :NE:
    • :BOS-NBA:
    • :BOS-NHL:
    • :Northeastern:
    • View Profile
Re: Add clarifying clause to our rules governing Prospect Extensions
« Reply #1 on: December 28, 2014, 03:59:13 PM »
So this clause considers "the following season" to be 2016 and not 2015 correct, as was shown in your example with Christian Yelich?
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline Flash

  • *ProFSL Staff
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2010
  • Posts: 23232
  • Bonus inPoints: 319
    • :SFO:
    • :GS:
    • :SJ:
    • :California:
    • :UnitedStates:
    • :SF:
    • View Profile
Re: Add clarifying clause to our rules governing Prospect Extensions
« Reply #2 on: December 28, 2014, 04:08:55 PM »
So this clause considers "the following season" to be 2016 and not 2015 correct, as was shown in your example with Christian Yelich?

As it stands right now, with the rule as it is presently written, my interpretation is that 2016 would be the following year.  If this clause is adopted, then the Prospect Contract is replaced by the extension immediately because 2015 becomes the following season.

My interpretation of the present rule is based on the fact that if a player with a 2015 contract is given an extension right now, it would not cancel out the 2015 contract, it would be added onto the length of the contract--with the starting point being 2016. 
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
🏆 2021 FGM World Series Champion - :SF:
🏆 2017 WCB2 World Series Champion - :SD:
🏆 2021 BSN Football Mt West Champion :UNLV:
🏆 2021 BSN Football Big 10 Champion -  :Nebraska:
🏆 2021 BSN Football Pac-12 Champion :California:

Offline Calvin

  • MVP
  • ****
  • Join Date: Oct 2013
  • Posts: 2933
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :IND:
    • :CHI-NBA:
    • :CHI-NHL:
    • :Stanford:
    • :CHI-MLS:
    • View Profile
Re: POLL: Add clarifying clause to our rules governing Prospect Extensions
« Reply #3 on: December 28, 2014, 10:52:31 PM »
Before I vote, just wondering, what is the rule on extensions for players not on PC?
Say I have player x, and in the middle of the season, he's been hurt and he was out all last season, thus, I know he's going to be a low resign value player, and I ink him to an extension. That extension begins the following year, correct?

---
and i nthe matt carpenter extension example, if Minnesota waits till say the day after opening day, then he would be able to get this extension done for 5 yrs at that new rate + the .3 of the current year?


funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline Flash

  • *ProFSL Staff
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2010
  • Posts: 23232
  • Bonus inPoints: 319
    • :SFO:
    • :GS:
    • :SJ:
    • :California:
    • :UnitedStates:
    • :SF:
    • View Profile
Re: POLL: Add clarifying clause to our rules governing Prospect Extensions
« Reply #4 on: December 28, 2014, 11:12:16 PM »
Before I vote, just wondering, what is the rule on extensions for players not on PC?
Say I have player x, and in the middle of the season, he's been hurt and he was out all last season, thus, I know he's going to be a low resign value player, and I ink him to an extension. That extension begins the following year, correct?

---
and i nthe matt carpenter extension example, if Minnesota waits till say the day after opening day, then he would be able to get this extension done for 5 yrs at that new rate + the .3 of the current year?

In your first example, you have to consider the current year (which would be a low rank because of his injury) and the previous year (where he could be a high rank). 

Here is the rule:
"You may only extend a player's contract in their final year, however, the new contract must be no less than 50% of the current deal and will not take effect until the following season.  Teams have rights to players (whose contracts just ended) in the off-season until either the player is prematurely released or off-season FA starts. Any extension that is made, will start the next year."

In the second scenario, if the extension was given during the season it would begin the following season.  It would be a five year contract at a reduced rate of the player's current market value--with a minimum contract of $4.0m.

Our poll deals with prospect extensions given during the off-season. 
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
🏆 2021 FGM World Series Champion - :SF:
🏆 2017 WCB2 World Series Champion - :SD:
🏆 2021 BSN Football Mt West Champion :UNLV:
🏆 2021 BSN Football Big 10 Champion -  :Nebraska:
🏆 2021 BSN Football Pac-12 Champion :California:

Offline Brent

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2010
  • Posts: 15381
  • Bonus inPoints: 3
    • :NO:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :LouisianaState:
    • :UnitedStates:
    • :CHC:
    • View Profile
Re: POLL: Add clarifying clause to our rules governing Prospect Extensions
« Reply #5 on: December 28, 2014, 11:44:13 PM »
This is the norm.  The benefit of extending them early is the %, but the extension starts the following year of the current season.  So a P-2015, P-2016, P-2017 extended in 2015 would all start the new "Extension" contract in 2016.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
:SEA: 2023 Field of Dreams - League Champion
:NOP: 2022-23 Buckets of Dimes - Eastern Conference Champion
:NO: 2021-2022 NFL Live -  30-4 (4-2) 2X NFC Runner-up/1X NFC South Champs
:NO: 2018-2020 NFL Countdown - 37-11 (3-2) 1X NFC Runner Up/2X NFC South Champs
8 ProFSL Hosted League Championships 2010-2019
Proud Member of the Who Dat Nation!

Offline Flash

  • *ProFSL Staff
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2010
  • Posts: 23232
  • Bonus inPoints: 319
    • :SFO:
    • :GS:
    • :SJ:
    • :California:
    • :UnitedStates:
    • :SF:
    • View Profile
Re: POLL: Add clarifying clause to our rules governing Prospect Extensions
« Reply #6 on: January 05, 2015, 03:24:59 AM »
 "No matter what the current prospect contract is, the prospect extension kicks in the following year at the rate based on when the contract is given."

This will be added to our Rules regarding Prospect Extensions.

Thanks to all who voted. :toth:
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
🏆 2021 FGM World Series Champion - :SF:
🏆 2017 WCB2 World Series Champion - :SD:
🏆 2021 BSN Football Mt West Champion :UNLV:
🏆 2021 BSN Football Big 10 Champion -  :Nebraska:
🏆 2021 BSN Football Pac-12 Champion :California:

 

Forum Search


Quick Profile

 
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

* Chat Room

Refresh History
  • Daddy: Was a bitch :rofl:
    Yesterday at 05:01:10 PM
  • Daddy: I know about 16 year old hockey players now. It was a great learning experience. I thought i knew hockey.
    Yesterday at 05:03:59 PM
  • Daddy: Huge NHL LIVE trade. The first BLOCKBUSTER
    Yesterday at 05:59:00 PM
  • Daddy: Connor McDavid comes to Broad St. :)
    Yesterday at 05:59:23 PM
  • Daddy: Lead us great Connor. Lead us to Dynasty Glory. :win: im counting on you eh.
    Yesterday at 06:00:31 PM
  • Bigdon: Nba live i.have chicago that's awesome thanks
    Yesterday at 06:02:13 PM
  • indiansnation: Daddy its 5pm and the flyers still suck
    Yesterday at 06:02:47 PM
  • Daddy: Yeah but my Flyers suck with Connor McDavid.
    Yesterday at 06:04:15 PM
  • Daddy: Dont hate me cuz im beautiful.
    Yesterday at 06:04:34 PM
  • Daddy: After a blockbuster trade, you know the feeling. I could get hit by thrown monkey poop right now and im still smiling while i eat a banana.
    Yesterday at 06:06:48 PM
  • Daddy: Who you got? Isnt Sidney Crosby coaching team Canada in the upcoming Olympics?
    Yesterday at 06:07:44 PM
  • Daddy: Ever seen Harlem Knights Brian? "" Dddddon't ttttake thththis Aaaaasssss whupin Ppppersonal" -Jack Jenkins
    Yesterday at 06:12:51 PM
  • Daddy: [link] for you. :)
    Yesterday at 06:14:34 PM
  • STLBlues91: @Daddy can you check the message I just sent. Quick question
    Yesterday at 09:14:25 PM
  • Daddy: Replied
    Yesterday at 09:48:39 PM
  • Daddy: If members do not mind, deleting old pms helps the site run smoother and keeps your pms organized.
    Yesterday at 10:07:23 PM
  • Daddy: Nobody gets more pms than i do. I stay deleting and still have pages and pages of pms
    Yesterday at 10:08:11 PM
  • Daddy: Its not required that you delete old news but its also not required you delete and spam emails. Same thing. Thanks!
    Yesterday at 10:09:35 PM
  • Daddy: If anyone wants one of these premium Flyers prospects, send me more pms to eventually delete. NFL/MLB/NHL you're welcome. On to the next LIVE chapters.
    Yesterday at 10:11:42 PM
  • STLBlues91: Thank you for the Prune message sections.
    Yesterday at 10:20:33 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: Yepp that was an easy axe of messages
    Yesterday at 10:53:25 PM
  • STLBlues91: I did happen to select 225 pages before I saw that option though
    Yesterday at 10:55:07 PM
  • Daddy: Man you had 225 pages? Damn. Im down to 12.
    Yesterday at 11:48:59 PM
  • Daddy: Some of them i have to keep.
    Yesterday at 11:49:25 PM
  • STLBlues91: I had 465 but I clicked 225 pages worth of messages before I found the prune option
    Yesterday at 11:50:01 PM
  • Daddy: Thats a ton of trade talks. You just recently became a moderator. Being a mod we communicate tons via pm.
    Yesterday at 11:50:51 PM
  • Daddy: Your 465 pages was 400+ of trade negotiations. In pages containing 20 threads each. . :rofl:
    Yesterday at 11:52:00 PM
  • STLBlues91: Yeah I talk a lot of players and deals
    Yesterday at 11:52:10 PM
  • STLBlues91: And the other 65 were draft reminders and otc messages
    Yesterday at 11:52:50 PM
  • Daddy: I bet you pruned some moderator Crap :rofl: some of them you have to keep.
    Yesterday at 11:52:59 PM
  • Daddy: I always resend the important stuff.
    Yesterday at 11:53:35 PM
  • STLBlues91: No I kept all messages within like 80 days
    Yesterday at 11:53:36 PM
  • STLBlues91: Yeah you got it all anyway. Im just here to type and plug in numbers
    Yesterday at 11:54:07 PM
  • Daddy: There is a new NCAA football team. TCU in the house.
    Yesterday at 11:54:29 PM
  • STLBlues91: When does NCAA open and all that
    Yesterday at 11:55:15 PM
  • Daddy: NFL LIVE just added another all star level GM. We are getting him up to speed. No not the one in Detroit.
    Yesterday at 11:55:31 PM
  • Daddy: July 1st
    Yesterday at 11:55:43 PM
  • Daddy: Where are we at? Somewhere around 50 teams i think. We have 64 but bringing them onboard profsl is a challenge.
    Yesterday at 11:56:38 PM
  • STLBlues91: Well Ill get to work more on that spread sheet like June 10th. Finishing touches on NHL then a few days off then will knock that out
    Yesterday at 11:56:47 PM
  • Daddy: So much easier. No contracts. No trades.
    Yesterday at 11:58:32 PM
  • jmntl82: I can’t stand the Detroit GM
    Yesterday at 11:59:19 PM
  • jmntl82: Keeps me up at night
    Yesterday at 11:59:34 PM
  • STLBlues91: Yeah the colors will take a bit as I find the rbg codes and thats 64 teams. I can copy and paste the makeup. Then just to plug in the players
    Today at 12:07:48 AM
  • BayAreaBallers: Is he taking over the jags team?
    Today at 12:20:40 AM
  • Daddy: Jags have two owners
    Today at 12:24:18 AM
  • Daddy: @Vik has been put on wait list and has already been replaced. The GM directory is updated.
    Today at 12:25:13 AM
  • Daddy: This owner is in Carolina.
    Today at 12:25:40 AM
  • Daddy: iRunFreeman recruited from off-site.
    Today at 12:27:44 AM
  • Daddy: Weve probably got 20 or so people that we just have to get on profsl then get them up to speed on how we post because everything is old school here
    Today at 12:29:27 AM
  • jmntl82: Im glad someone else said that, when I joined armchair I was so lost on here
    Today at 12:40:48 AM