|
::
::
Vote Log
| Timestamp | Member | Choice | Choice Label / Comment |
|---|---|---|---|
| August 25, 2014, 03:28:49 PM | (Guest or Removed Member) | 1 |
YES. I am ok with this trade (add comment on why you agree). The 2 owners are stand up guys who are smart hockey owners and want to fill wishlists! There is no conflict of interest. No team is getting the short end. Its benefitting the teams of only 1 owner. And it seems to be by the book. :iatp: |
| August 25, 2014, 04:31:54 PM | (Guest or Removed Member) | 1 |
YES. I am ok with this trade (add comment on why you agree). Nothing sneaky happening here. 4 teams are getting better by adding needs. |
| August 25, 2014, 07:40:07 PM | (Guest or Removed Member) | 1 |
YES. I am ok with this trade (add comment on why you agree). To be honest vetoing this trade is by definition crippling the teams in that we would be forcing them into one dimensional trades which might limit their ability to compete. In essence a veto hurts the league as a whole by forcing teams to be less competi |
| August 26, 2014, 02:14:11 AM | (Guest or Removed Member) | 1 |
YES. I am ok with this trade (add comment on why you agree). :CLB: eating lots of cap , :NYI: swaping players to fill a need , :CHI-NHL: giving too much to land a high paid RW and :WIN: wins this one with a big cap dump + landing a 1st round , great young RW and a prospect . |
| August 26, 2014, 07:22:25 AM | (Guest or Removed Member) | 1 |
YES. I am ok with this trade (add comment on why you agree). Fair and equal trade, so a yes from me. But, in principal, for the future, not in favour of any transaction that involves 2 teams of same ownership. |
| August 26, 2014, 07:27:41 AM | (Guest or Removed Member) | 1 |
YES. I am ok with this trade (add comment on why you agree). The trade is fair, no player transfers teams owned by the same person. There are currently no rules I think this trade goes against. |
| August 27, 2014, 02:39:55 PM | (Guest or Removed Member) | 1 |
YES. I am ok with this trade (add comment on why you agree). Jets free up Cap space. Otherwise, looks like a lot of deck chairs moving around on the Titanic. :) Nothing to veto though. |
| August 25, 2014, 03:04:27 PM | papps | 1 |
YES. I am ok with this trade (add comment on why you agree). I'm ok with the trade going through. I'm not a big fan of multiple team owner rule but that is a separate issue. |
| August 26, 2014, 12:08:19 AM | PigsRule | 1 |
YES. I am ok with this trade (add comment on why you agree). Fair and well thought out trade. We are not here to block owners from building their dream franchise. If this deal hurt 1 team we would kill it. Otherwise it is more a matter of revisiting multiple team ownership guidelines with so many new owners on boa |
| August 25, 2014, 05:39:34 PM | Burkes Boys | 1 |
YES. I am ok with this trade (add comment on why you agree). A fair trade between two of FNHL top owners where four teams get what they need to build their version of a winner. Where's the muddiness? |
| August 27, 2014, 11:06:10 PM | LIVE DynastySports | 1 |
YES. I am ok with this trade (add comment on why you agree). Lets move on from this already boyz. |
| August 25, 2014, 09:09:32 PM | SlackJack | 2 |
NO. Veto because (post explanation). I believe the deal goes against the spirit of the rules in that the trading field should be clearly level for all. |
