The third veto does not count, you have to post a reason. According to the rules
"Any veto must provide a detailed, factually based basis for that veto. Reasons for a veto would include but are not limited to factors such as statistical comparison, contract status, age, injury history, talent level, organizational makeup, past trade history, and/or collusion."
Therefore that veto doesn't count. If we are not following the rules all hell breaks loose.
Did anyone read the other two vetoes?
![Huh? ???](https://www.profsl.com/smf/Smileys/default/huh.gif)
?? They contradict one another. One says the mets did not get enough, the other says miami. What does that mean?
![Huh? ???](https://www.profsl.com/smf/Smileys/default/huh.gif)
This means both are getting screwed and both are taking advantage of the other. Makes sense, which equals a
Fair TradeBoth managers have obviously proven themselves in the league.
I approve the trade