51
Cross-Court Dynasty / Re: Rule change proposals for 2024/25 season
« on: April 17, 2024, 10:53:30 AM »
I would disagree that a team having $17 mil extra in cap this year as "relatively limited".
I also would disagree that in 25/26 the impact of the old rule would "become almost null" because the assets that teams acquired will still be on their teams or traded for other assets. I would expect the top teams to remain top teams for at least several years past the cap advantages. I would say it's impossible to quantify the time it will take for this to be fixed.
That's why I was thinking the sooner these deals are gone the better.
Why not give extra cap this year to the teams who do not have these subsidies? I don't understand how it's too hard to quantify. But it's ok.
Thanks for responding to my post
I also would disagree that in 25/26 the impact of the old rule would "become almost null" because the assets that teams acquired will still be on their teams or traded for other assets. I would expect the top teams to remain top teams for at least several years past the cap advantages. I would say it's impossible to quantify the time it will take for this to be fixed.
That's why I was thinking the sooner these deals are gone the better.
Why not give extra cap this year to the teams who do not have these subsidies? I don't understand how it's too hard to quantify. But it's ok.
Thanks for responding to my post