161
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to. 161
Armchair Fantasy Baseball: Completed Transactions / Re: J2 Daiber De Los Santos (SS) MIN« on: February 25, 2024, 01:01:36 PM »162
Armchair Fantasy Baseball: Completed Transactions / J2 Daiber De Los Santos (SS) MIN« on: February 25, 2024, 01:00:53 PM »
Daiber De Los Santos (SS) MIN
PC+2M 163
Armchair Fantasy Baseball: Invalid Transactions / P2 Daiber De Los Santos (SS) MIN« on: February 25, 2024, 01:00:01 PM »164
Armchair Fantasy Baseball: Invalid Transactions / Re: Trade:CIN/LAA« on: February 25, 2024, 12:27:58 PM »If you wanted him that badly you wouldn't have opened with a bid of 4.5 as soon as you did that you lost. 5M would've gotten you around 17M total. He has 26M. It wouldn't have made a difference. You should have posted a bid at 13M, using all your money to get your top guy It's not your job to critique how I bid and what my strategies are. Your job is to be an impartial moderator for the league and honestly you've done a fantastic job at it. I just disagree with your universal decision on this trade and think that there should be a better way of doing vetoes. I would really like a public vote from the Trade Team with rationale given for the approval or veto. I 100% believe there needs to be checks and balances so people don't get taken advantage of and for the health of the league. I don't think that one person, even the league moderator, should have complete authority to judge a trade on their own personal beliefs. All that being said this deal is dead as dead can be. Anyone interested in Suarez please let me know. I'm happy to still eat the same amount for this year and next for the appropriate return. 165
Armchair Fantasy Baseball: Invalid Transactions / Re: Trade:CIN/LAA« on: February 25, 2024, 06:14:12 AM »
Angels - That's a very good way of putting it. I am unable to even compete now for De Vries because of the timing of this veto, which is massively affecting my rebuild.
That being said, we will try to rework the deal and I understand that valuations can be viewed differently when looked at from unique perspectives. 166
Armchair Fantasy Baseball: Update on Spreadsheet / Re: J2 Emil Morales SS LAD« on: February 24, 2024, 08:09:05 PM »
Pc + 4.5M
167
Armchair Fantasy Baseball: Invalid Transactions / Re: J2 SS Leodalis De Vries SD« on: February 24, 2024, 07:26:56 PM »
Pc +12.25M
168
Armchair Fantasy Baseball: Update on Spreadsheet / Re: J2 SS Leodalis De Vries SD« on: February 24, 2024, 07:23:32 PM »
Pc +11M
169
Armchair Fantasy Baseball: Update on Spreadsheet / Re: J2 SS Leodalis De Vries SD« on: February 24, 2024, 07:19:32 PM »
PC+9,850,000
170
Armchair Fantasy Baseball: Invalid Transactions / Re: Trade:CIN/LAA« on: February 24, 2024, 05:17:38 PM »
Respectfully,
I'm only paying 17 this year and 7 next year and have no shot at competing in any arena besides the International FA Market and that is being negatively affected. It's not just 1 prospect, it's the flexibility as well to bid on players which is extremely valuable. LAA was an intentional trade partner because he had needs and assets that I wanted and I know that he's in the AL so it won't affect my team as much. Isn't there a veto team or anything for situations like this? I feel like just one person having ultimate control is not a fair system in general. |
|