We realize that having two different channels is not always ideal, but the addition of an alternative and parallel chat has greatly stimulated activity in terms of both discussions and trades. The number of trades is growing rapidly with 20 trades already completed this early in the offseason and we are not even close to the rookie draft.

The long-term goal is to try to have all members active on both channels, taking advantage of the best that ProFSL and Discord have to offer and encouraging the use of discussion Board for discussions on key points for the league to avoid duplication.

It may take some time, but we are confident that we can do it. For the time being, the LM and moderators are ensuring that all key league events are duplicated so that all members are aligned

Thank you for your opinion @Daddy .
However it is important to make some clarifications, because some things said do not correspond to reality and therefore fueling them would not be correct.

The changes made in the last 2 years are in the direction of adding constraints for the best teams with high salaries (removal of cash exchange, introduction of rising salaries). No complications have been added for the other teams, on the contrary, an attempt has been made to make the league experience more complete, more realistic and to offer alternative and parallel communication channels (Discord). The FA's proposal for change was just intended to simplify in the medium term (once the teams had become familiar with a system that is actually absolutely simple), not to complicate. However, considering that some members did not immediately appreciate or understand the proposal and again having the best interests of the league at heart, we have preferred to postpone any adjustments to the next season.

Another clarification, since the league started only 2 vetoes have been placed (my team, by the way, I suffered one of the two), so honestly the use of vetoes has not been abused as it would seem.
The residues of the cash exchange, as already widely discussed, are limited this season and will go to zero substantially from next season. What remains and makes some teams better and others worse are 4 years of trades and FA signings in which some teams have moved a lot and others have made no moves or simply made wrong trades. There are teams that in 1-2 years, with some moves on the market, have gone from the bottom of the standings to being contenders (Kings and Pistons for example), so it is totally possible in CCD for a quality GM to transform a bad team into a contender in reasonable time.

The quality of CCD GMs is overall good and is getting better every year, new rules applied in the last two year (making more complicated for top teams to improve) will allow good and active GMs to reduce or close any gap.
And we are strongly working for improving the league experience and increasing member participation with the goal to have good and active GMs in our league

After the initial discussion on Discord, we realized that the proposal (option 2) did not have the widespread support we were hoping for and, more importantly, was causing too much confusion so close to the start of free agency.
As a result, we decided to lock the vote and postpone the poll until later in the season, with the goal of having an adjusted FA bidding system that takes into account rising salaries in place for the 2025/26 season

The proposal to change the bidding process has not received the widespread support we expected in Discord and, above all, is causing too much confusion. Let's take a step back.

For this season, we will keep the current system based on the total contract value with a fixed salary throughout the contract duration and simply switch from the transaction board to the Fantrax Forum to make FA bids.

We will evaluate for next season possible solutions to incorporate the rising salary system into free agent contracts as well

Utah Jazz