Author Topic: Scoring for Pitchers  (Read 5025 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Canada8999

  • Guest
Re: Scoring for Pitchers
« Reply #40 on: July 17, 2010, 02:34:24 AM »
But with all that being said, the fact of the matter is, it would be flat out wrong to change the system. if you do it, it shouldnt take effect for a couple years. teams have signed players and traded for players, that fit THIS scoring system. by changing it you would effectively be screwing those teams over.
:iatp:
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline rcankosy

  • All-Star
  • ***
  • Join Date: Oct 2009
  • Posts: 2486
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: Scoring for Pitchers
« Reply #41 on: July 17, 2010, 10:19:47 AM »
I would be in favor of gradually tweaking the scoring if others felt that it was more realistic.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline rcankosy

  • All-Star
  • ***
  • Join Date: Oct 2009
  • Posts: 2486
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: Scoring for Pitchers
« Reply #42 on: July 17, 2010, 11:35:19 AM »
Ignorance is bliss my friend...
http://www.sportingnews.com/mlb/article/2010-04-01/uzr-fip-babip-stats-give-baseball-new-language
http://www.baseballprospectus.com/glossary/index.php?search=FIP

I could list countless websites that promote these facts, I encourage you to find one reputable source that disputes them...

Preferring James' formulas to yours is not ignorance my friend, it's intelligance!  :rofl:
« Last Edit: July 17, 2010, 11:47:15 AM by rcankosy »
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Canada8999

  • Guest
Re: Scoring for Pitchers
« Reply #43 on: July 17, 2010, 11:01:09 PM »
Using Bill James' Game Score formula(see below) for pitching, Tommy Hunter would have compiled 53 points last night, while Tim Wakefield would have only earned 16 points.  Please think about it guys.

Start with 50 points.
Add 1 point for each out recorded, so 3 points for every complete inning pitched.
Add 2 points for each inning completed after the 4th.
Add 1 point for each strikeout.
Subtract 2 points for each hit allowed.
Subtract 4 points for each earned run allowed.
Subtract 2 points for each unearned run allowed.
Subtract 1 point for each walk.

There are several inherent issues with the Game Score
  • It's designed for starting pitchers, and would not be directly re-applicable to our RP's
  • It counts hits and earned runs, which are not within a pitchers control
  • It does not include GB/FB, which a pitcher can control (will not capture as much actual skill as other metrics could)

This is in addition to being a major change, which is really a risky decision for scoring.
« Last Edit: July 17, 2010, 11:02:55 PM by Brewers GM »
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Dan Wood

  • Guest
Re: Scoring for Pitchers
« Reply #44 on: July 18, 2010, 11:47:56 AM »
I have been away from this posting for a while and it seems to have gone out of control. First off, Roy will be gone for the next week, so he cannot respond to any further posts until he returns. I have a few suggestions and the first one I hate, buut I am going to present it anyway.

1. Add quality starts as a category - I loathe this idea, but it gives points to a pitcher for going 6+ innings. I watched the Wakefield start and he got whooped. Despite what the stats may show, he wasn't unlucky he was just bad.  Tommy Hunter on the other hand, I feel is a fringe pitcher but he did pitch well enough despite two bombs. This could also go into luck because he was in trouble a lot of the game but got out of it. I personally feel he is due for a stat correction in the near future.

2. Somehow adding line drives. Ben I have done research on this after I had suggested it, since I didn't want to keep posting blindly. You are correct it is out of the pitchers control in a statistical manner of speaking. But if the guy isn't hitting his spots and he doesn't get hit hard, then it is the batters fault. As you said LD evens out, so if that is the case it should fluctuate from start to start. Maybe adding or subtracting from a guys weekly score.

But, and I am sure you guys have noticed it too, since I am sure you all watch a decent amount of baseball, is that some of these guys are getting hit hard on a regular basis. James Shields (going back to him again) has had his LD rate increase for the past several years, His BABIP however is a little out of line with his career norms. He also has a very good defense behind him. o my question is what does that make him? His career arc is that of a pitcher who is increasingly getting hit since his break out year of 2007. Maybe these are his new skills?

I do like the scoring the way it is, but I also feel it can be tweaked a little bit. To my knowledge there isn't a statistical measurement that is solely on the pitcher to measure if he is getting hit hard outside of home runs. Then again home runs could be a factor of weather - winds blowing in, out, park, time of year, humidity, etc. This isn't a perfect science, but I think we need something added to the pitchers scoring. I have given my suggestions, and welcome others. I agree with Roy in that aspect, but I don't think adding ERA or whip to the mix is the answer, since they are defense and bullpen dependent.   


funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

daddypadre

  • Guest
Re: Scoring for Pitchers
« Reply #45 on: July 18, 2010, 12:22:32 PM »
I would be in favor of gradually tweaking the scoring if others felt that it was more realistic.

I want to know what definition you give "realistic". Are we looking to isolate the value a pitcher brings to his ball club? (which could be done using the statistics we currently use and in my opinion a few other categories) Or are we looking to find the competition and the smarts needed in picking the right pitchers on the right teams who are going to put up better numbers than a less fortunate counterpart on a worse team?
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

 

Forum Search


Quick Profile

 
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

* Chat Room

Refresh History
  • Daddy: This LIVE Crap is next level. See for yourself.
    Yesterday at 02:34:21 AM
  • Braves155: Morning LIVE Fanatics
    Yesterday at 09:39:56 AM
  • Braves155: Who's round today for talks? I did receive a few PMs, so I'll respond to those shortly
    Yesterday at 01:17:33 PM
  • STLBlues91: I am always around
    Yesterday at 01:19:42 PM
  • Braves155: Is there an NHL LIVE spreadsheet?
    Yesterday at 01:22:30 PM
  • STLBlues91: Yeah its the NHL Live Rosters LINK
    Yesterday at 01:44:36 PM
  • Daddy: I keep forgetting to link the icons. My bad.
    Yesterday at 01:55:13 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: Champions League final today
    Yesterday at 02:20:42 PM
  • indiansnation: Jim w pm
    Yesterday at 06:58:32 PM
  • indiansnation: Braves155 pm
    Yesterday at 06:59:45 PM
  • Braves155: Replied
    Yesterday at 07:01:58 PM
  • Mt_Crushmore: Shout out to Daddy for putting this NHL LIVE.
    Yesterday at 07:33:38 PM
  • Mt_Crushmore: Round of applause to the team of admins
    Yesterday at 07:35:27 PM
  • Braves155: PM Crushmore
    Yesterday at 07:56:05 PM
  • indiansnation: Braves155 pm
    Yesterday at 08:07:50 PM
  • indiansnation: Hey Pittsburgh looking to move remaining picks in 2024 and 2025 NHL live
    Yesterday at 08:09:10 PM
  • Daddy: The NHL LIVE DRAFT is 3 DAYS AFTER the NHL Draft. Get those rosters ready for your picks.
    Yesterday at 08:27:41 PM
  • Daddy: We hit the ground running lol
    Yesterday at 08:28:36 PM
  • indiansnation: Alpha5 pm
    Yesterday at 08:35:08 PM
  • indiansnation: Braves155 pm
    Yesterday at 09:06:59 PM
  • Mt_Crushmore: Tampa Bay Lightning open for offers. Looking for LW/RW.
    Yesterday at 09:14:08 PM
  • STLBlues91: Im around the rest of the night for any trades
    Yesterday at 11:03:43 PM
  • Daddy: If i don't have offers in my inbox for baseball, there are messages from football or hockey. Its the profsl experience ive been wanting.
    Today at 12:07:26 AM
  • Daddy: Excited for NBA
    Today at 12:07:45 AM
  • STLBlues91: Im just looking at the draft prospects this and next year figuring out my plan
    Today at 12:08:08 AM
  • STLBlues91: Im ready for that expansion draft
    Today at 12:08:19 AM
  • Daddy: Yeah so about that. One team get first pick in the expansion draft. The other gets first pick in the amateur draft.
    Today at 12:10:24 AM
  • STLBlues91: Yeah figured that was how it would be
    Today at 12:11:15 AM
  • Daddy: I could flip a coin but nobody but me would see it. So a number has been selected between 1-32. You are both getting pms along with the two other mods.
    Today at 12:12:09 AM
  • STLBlues91: Sounds good. When you thinking this will occur
    Today at 12:12:41 AM
  • Daddy: Whomever guesses closer to the number gets the 1st overall pick in the amateur draft. The other picks first in expansion.
    Today at 12:13:04 AM
  • Daddy: Im getting it out the way tomorrow
    Today at 12:13:49 AM
  • Daddy: Ive got the tools now to build the matrix and the league.
    Today at 12:14:20 AM
  • STLBlues91: Sounds good, I will be thinking of a solid number
    Today at 12:15:05 AM
  • Daddy: Best get to building it.
    Today at 12:15:32 AM
  • Daddy: Honestly idk why the NBA doesn't do it that way for expanding. Two teams at a time. Expansion draft to amateur draft. I think the idea is fresh and its execution will be pretty dope. ;)
    Today at 12:25:15 AM
  • jimw: I think the NBA goes one team at a time to give the one team a better talent pool in the expansion draft and also to keep the teams from complaining about losing more players
    Today at 01:25:47 AM
  • Daddy: Thats fair
    Today at 01:27:48 AM
  • BayAreaBallers: that makes sense
    Today at 01:32:38 AM
  • Daddy: I mean they only losing one guy anyway tho. We expose 10 players, protect 5 players, each team, all 30 will lose one player.
    Today at 01:36:30 AM
  • Daddy: The expansion teams will then both have 15 players heading into the amateur draft with picks #1 & #2.
    Today at 01:37:43 AM
  • Daddy: Each other team will still have 14 players and one first round pick.
    Today at 01:38:26 AM
  • Daddy: They need to hire me is what they need to do :rofl:
    Today at 01:38:53 AM
  • Daddy: Yeah you lose a guy to the expansion draft. Likely your 6th man. Then the very next day you draft his replacement and keep it moving.
    Today at 01:40:25 AM
  • STLBlues91: Daddy quick question in your messages
    Today at 01:44:14 AM
  • Daddy: We are good to go.:toth:
    Today at 02:01:09 AM
  • jimw: I think in the Bobcat expansion each team could protect 8 players. And I think the bobcats has to take at least 14 so half the league didn't even lose a player.
    Today at 02:09:14 AM
  • jimw: That was a long time ago though
    Today at 02:09:59 AM
  • indiansnation: Alpha5 pm
    Today at 08:08:43 AM
  • indiansnation: Jschwab pn
    Today at 08:10:44 AM