Trade: Astros / Nationals

[GeoffTheScout]

Miller Scored a bit less than leak so he would be worth more cause you know premium position not many guys score like that who are R P and what not according to you. Leake is half as useful as Miller so 3sts works since you traded less for less.  Leak may not even finish the year in the rotation STL has 7 guys who can be SP.

[Mets Donations Accepted]

If we're taking the one owner to make a deal method why was there an uoroar with previous deals a majority of the league felt was fair?

[Maydab23]

When I first saw this trade I thought it was clearly in the astros favor. However, the astros have made this type of trade for future picks many times over the years which is part of the reason his farm is so stacked. If various owners are continually willing to trade future picks in deals like this then obviously it's not that outrageous as some owners just don't value future picks as much as others.

Just because a trade may look uneven at first glance doesn't mean it's necessarily veto worthy. I just hope people *cough* Chris *cough* remember that when they vote on trades. Double standards should not apply.

 

[RSmetana]

 

[RyanJames5]

4 picks that high may be a little steep, but nothing close to veto worthy.

 

[Vanadio]

 

[Jss0062]

 

[ldsjayhawk]

I'd never do it and I'd like to veto it based on the precedence it sets.  Don't come looking for four picks from me for a #3 starter.

 

[frankbullsfan]

 

[chrisetc21]

9 Appprovals
1 Veto

Trade Passes