0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
I agree it's lopsided talent wise but Ramirez and Dunn are both on the downside of their careers and $34.5 million in payroll is a ton. I can see the reasoning though Wittgren is a sneaky pick up because he could be Miami's closer soon.
Yes Dunn is clearly on the downside and his playing time will be cut into as he will likely platoon at DH Konerko. I have no problem at all dumping Dunn. Ramirez on the other had is entering his age 32 season and has been very consistent over his career. He is a low strikeout guy who is a very good base runner. He's also an above average defender. These are all traits that age well and will keep him on the field and lend to consistency. I'm completely ok with paying to dump Dunn as the value doesn't match the contract. Ramirez's contract is a good value for the production and he is being given away. The reasoning is excellent and I would've called the trade a push if I had not checked the production numbers. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Perhaps I shouldn't poke the bear in this instance since it looks like the trade will go through, but here I go. The voting on trades is not, or at least should not be, to ensure that all trades are equal. It is to ensure that trades are not so outrageously unfair that it will irreparably damage one team or overpower the other. If it is anywhere near a push, or both teams have sound reasoning, without harming the league, it should be approved.Sorry, my two cents on what the trading process should be like.