IP/Start limit for pitchers - RC needed

[Brewers GM]

I think my standing policy is that unless a change is either a no brainer or there is a significant problem, I am going to vote against.  In this case we have a new limit, lets see how it works before we keep making changes.

[joeshmoe]

I think my standing policy is that unless a change is either a no brainer or there is a significant problem, I am going to vote against.  In this case we have a new limit, lets see how it works before we keep making changes.

I understand not wanting to do anything, BUT IF we HAVE to do something...please do it  BEFORE free agency.  That is all.

[Colby]

I understand not wanting to do anything, BUT IF we HAVE to do something...please do it  BEFORE free agency.  That is all.

 

[joeshmoe]

I just thought about this; we put so much emphasis on hitting and limit the effect of pitching, like 70/30...well; how come the 2011 Red Sox fell apart?  If hitting would account for 70% of win?  Just food for thought?

[rcankosy]

Is it time for the RC to officially vote on this?  In my opinion, we should give the RC 7-10 days to vote on this and put this to bed.

[Dan Wood]

I think we are deadlocked 3-3

[Dan Wood]

Me, Vols, Colby for 7 starts/ 65 IP

Roy, Howe, Ben for 65 IP...

Colby how do we do a tie breaker?

[rcankosy]

What was the final decision on this?  It affects how I bid on SP as well as other positions.

[Dan Wood]

Eff it, I'm changing my vote - 65 IP...pass it