Drop 
C Gomes, Yan, $4m (2020) (3m 2m 1m 1m 1m)
CI JB Dantzler spec

Send Luis Urias and Albert Suarez to the minors.

Extend
MI d'Arnaud, Chase, $0.5m (2016) -> rank 79 in 16 and less than 100 in 15 -> 0.5m (2018)                        
CI Parmelee, Chris, $0.5m (2017) -> less than 100 in 16 and less than 100 in 15 -> 0.5m (2018)            
CI Perez, Hernan, $0.5m (2017) -> rank 76 in 16 and less than 100 in 15 -> 0.5m (2018)               
MI Petit, Gregorio, $0.5m (2017) -> rank 77 in 16 and less than 100 in 15 -> 0.5m (2018)            
MI/OF Santana, Danny, $1m (2017) -> rank 78 in 16 (less than 107 in OF) and less than 107 in 15 in both -> 1m (2018)               
OF Reimold, Nolan, $1.5m (2016) -> less than 107 in 16 and less than 107 in 15 -> 1.5m (2018) Question: under the 70% rule salary should be 1.05, is it rounded up or down? If down, then 1m (2018))            
RP Coleman, Louis, $0.5m (2016) -> less than 100 in 16 and less than 100 in 15 -> 0.5m (2017)            
RP Feliz, Neftali, $0.5m (2016) -> rank 92 in 16 and less than 100 in 15 -> 0.5m (2018)                           
SP Griffin, AJ, $0.5m (2017) -> less than 139 in 16 and less than 139 in 15 -> 0.5m (2018)   

Prospect Extension
MI/CI/OF Dietrich, Derek, $0.5m (P-2016) -> rank 44 in 16 as CI and 26 as MI and 46 as OF (for some reason when searching as CI and OF his points are changed from what he has actually scored so I used the total that appears on my lineup page), and less than that in 15 in all positions -> 4m (2021)

1.5

spec

Giving away Jake Peavy (expiring 4.5m), Yan Gomes (4m 2020), and Alex Rodriguez (expiring 8m, I can pay a part) for any prospect you don't want (need cap room). Basically whoever wants them and can pay for them can take them. May be useful to playoff contenders

Finally, the 'warning' PM was sent when I actually won the bid, which like I mentioned I was away and had no internet access (and no, I had no internet on my phone, since I use T-Mobile that has no signal in lots of places), so I could not see it. If I had known before I left for the weekend I would had sent via PM my specific contract intentions (which were already clear from past messages) before leaving for the weekend in case I won while I was away. 

This is just another example of being a stickler for the rules instead of accepting that life happens. It has happened before and sometimes you guys are lax, sometimes you become all strict and stern. It is pretty random, which makes it unfair. That is why I am asking for solid reasoning behind this decision other than following through on a prior threat, which should never have happened to begin with.

There was no unfair advantage from waiting the extra 24 hours and I do not understand why it's such a big deal (plus I am not even sure why the rule gives only 24 hours, it is a very arbitrary time frame).