0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
I?m beyond confused by this voting process. Is it not fair and square moving forward with option 5 as that had the most votes yesterday (Friday)? It seems like a select few people are pushing hard for option 2 and will do whatever it takes to get it selected. I even received a PM from another owner about a trade they had setup and planned to complete for Anthony Davis if I didn?t change my vote to option 2. That owner was clearly hoping to send a message using the trade he had in place, but it did not change my opinion. Even after that PM I decided to stick with option 5.More than okay with either option that is selected as I respect the process and league commissioners, but I will most likely step down as GM if we take away cash exchanges. I join leagues on ProFSL for the simulation type GM style, and taking away cash exchanges makes this all much more basic. Please do not take this as a threat, I am just being transparent. I do agree we need to limit cash exchanges, but it seems way to extreme to end them all together. Why not go with option 5, give it a year? if it still isn?t working, change to option 2. Doing it vice versa would not help at all. Just my two sense.
I?m sticking with my decision!Best,Alex
Not looking to cause any drama or add to this long thread, but?I just wanted to once again double down on my decision for voting on option #5.A very strong chance I would step down as GM if we eliminate cash exchanges completely. There has to be middle ground here? and I think option 5 is it.Thanks!Alex
Fair enough. I read your post on the cash exchanges and can totally respect that. Good luck this season!