Author Topic: Mets/Twins Trade  (Read 1971 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

chicubs33

  • Guest
Re: Mets/Twins Trade
« Reply #20 on: January 15, 2012, 04:31:48 PM »
See thats why I have a problem with this trade...he could have gotten more for the quality of players he was given up no matter what the cap relief was. Yes maybe Arcia will be a decent player but he's also a corner OF...plenty of those guys around the league. Usually the team taking on the salary is giving up the better prospects and is ready to win now...that isnt happening in this deal. Trade wasnt worth it IMO, obviously im the only one that thinks so.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Lindner

  • Guest
Re: Mets/Twins Trade
« Reply #21 on: January 15, 2012, 04:42:49 PM »
See thats why I have a problem with this trade...he could have gotten more for the quality of players he was given up no matter what the cap relief was. Yes maybe Arcia will be a decent player but he's also a corner OF...plenty of those guys around the league. Usually the team taking on the salary is giving up the better prospects and is ready to win now...that isnt happening in this deal. Trade wasnt worth it IMO, obviously im the only one that thinks so.

I'm not sure why anyone would want to take on contracts and and give up prospects, but that's okay with me.
« Last Edit: January 22, 2012, 06:40:59 PM by Lindner »
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

chicubs33

  • Guest
Re: Mets/Twins Trade
« Reply #22 on: January 15, 2012, 04:51:13 PM »
What contract did i take on Nolasco? If you look at the contracts i got rid of before you factor in the money i kicked in with it, i got rid of $90M and took on roughly $25M. After all is said and done i still saved over $30M...im sry but i dont see the problem in that deal.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline snbts

  • MVP
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jun 2011
  • Posts: 2946
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :SFO:
    • :CHI-NBA:
    • :STL-NHL:
    • :Illinois:
    • View Profile
Re: Mets/Twins Trade
« Reply #23 on: January 15, 2012, 04:54:45 PM »
Could we please keep this thread to deal strictly with the Mets/Twins trade?
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
If God be your partner, make your plans large.--D.L.Moody

:STL: 2013 NL only vs AL only World Series Champions
:StLouisBrowns: 2013 Old School World Series Champions
:DET: 2013 Mendoza Line World Series Champions

chicubs33

  • Guest
Re: Mets/Twins Trade
« Reply #24 on: January 15, 2012, 05:00:17 PM »
Just trying to explain my reason for not liking it
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Lindner

  • Guest
Re: Mets/Twins Trade
« Reply #25 on: January 15, 2012, 05:44:27 PM »
I was referring the this quote, not your trade...

Usually the team taking on the salary is giving up the better prospects and is ready to win now...that isnt happening in this deal.

It doesn't make sense to me, but that's okay.  Obviously we different perspectives on this.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

chicubs33

  • Guest
Re: Mets/Twins Trade
« Reply #26 on: January 15, 2012, 07:05:10 PM »
Teams taking on high contract players generally do so bc they believe they're getting the better deal in the short term. They're willing to give up a little of the future to win now and aren't concerned as much about the money if it translates to more wins. A team like the Twins taking on roughly $30M to pick up some prospects is odd to me...a team that has more money available from year to year makes this trade more reasonable to me. I guess when you said you were trying to rebuild is where i got thrown off. Both the Mets and Twins are trying to rebuild so having Jason Bay involved in a deal where no money is going along with him is questionable IMO...if everyone else in the league is cool with it then so am I. Just not the way I would have done it.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline Daniel

  • MVP
  • ****
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 3918
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :LAL:
    • :LA:
    • :UCLA:
    • :LIV:
    • View Profile
Re: Mets/Twins Trade
« Reply #27 on: January 15, 2012, 07:34:01 PM »
@chicubs. What makes that trade so great in comparison to this one? They are equally fair. On that trade you got rid of 30m , but over three years and committing 36m from your cap room during those three years to pay for a player not on your team.

You cleared 14m in 2012, 8m in 2013 and 10m in 2014. A notable achievement, yes.
But, I am clearing 14m in 2012 and 16m in 2013 without committing a single dollar from my cap. That looks pretty good to me as well and gives my team the added flexibility it needs.

Nice that you got Gaby Sanchez and Scott Cousins, but you also gave much more value than what I am giving away here. Keep in mind that you traded away arguably the top RP in baseball in Marmol. Soriano produces more than Bay *even though his contract is even crappier* and Zambrano may produce if he actually decides to pitch rather than get angry.

I believe that deal you made was undoubtedly fair, but also that it is not as different from this one as you keep saying. Just because you don't believe Arcia is any good does not make dozens of scouts wrong. I for one would pick Arcia over Cousins. And even though Plouffe is currently worthless, stranger things have happened. Jose Bautista was just as worthless two and a half years ago, and look where he is now. Sometimes all a guy needs is an opportunity to hit every day to explode. Plouffe has a lot of raw power and I like that.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Franchise GM: Toronto Blue Jays

chicubs33

  • Guest
Re: Mets/Twins Trade
« Reply #28 on: January 15, 2012, 09:42:35 PM »
Scot Cousins is your arguement? The deal was done bc i saved $30M+ and still got back Gaby Sanchez and Ricky Nolasco...don't care what years the money was spread over. And you said Arcia is one of the best OF prospects in baseball...yes he is, after the other 25 OF's ahead of him. Also Marmol will be lucky to hold onto his closers job...how often do closers with no control make it more than a couple seasons in that role and to go along with that he was gonna make $17M. Apparently im the only one who doesnt like it so be happy.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline Daniel

  • MVP
  • ****
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 3918
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :LAL:
    • :LA:
    • :UCLA:
    • :LIV:
    • View Profile
Re: Mets/Twins Trade
« Reply #29 on: January 23, 2012, 11:34:13 AM »
Can we get some votes on this trade to see what's going on? Thanks
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Franchise GM: Toronto Blue Jays

 

Forum Search


Quick Profile

 
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

* Chat Room

Refresh History
  • Daddy: Whoever takes over that expansion gets to name the team.
    Yesterday at 11:07:01 PM
  • Daddy: Probably four years before the actual NBA does it. To hell with 2028.
    Yesterday at 11:07:53 PM
  • Braves155: Las Vegas Gold Diggers
    Yesterday at 11:08:26 PM
  • Daddy: I dig it
    Yesterday at 11:10:25 PM
  • Bigdon: I am chicago right
    Yesterday at 11:29:29 PM
  • Daddy: Sign up Bigdon. Chicago is gone already.
    Yesterday at 11:36:50 PM
  • Daddy: NBA LIVE [link] Pre-reserved sign up
    Yesterday at 11:37:29 PM
  • STLBlues91: Ill switch for Vegas if he wants the bulls
    Yesterday at 11:39:17 PM
  • Daddy: Sounds good
    Yesterday at 11:43:59 PM
  • Daddy: I knew Vegas would be tempting :rofl:
    Yesterday at 11:44:25 PM
  • Daddy: He still needs to select NCAA
    Yesterday at 11:44:40 PM
  • Daddy: You get to name them sir. NBA LIVE will start with an expansion draft, followed by the rookie draft.
    Yesterday at 11:45:39 PM
  • Daddy: Vegas will get the #1 pick :toast:
    Yesterday at 11:46:07 PM
  • Daddy: Super Sonics #2 pick (insert eye emoji)
    Yesterday at 11:46:44 PM
  • Daddy: All subject to trade before the draft of course.
    Yesterday at 11:47:03 PM
  • Brent: With an expansion draft, does that mean we select x number of players on our roster to protect?
    Yesterday at 11:47:51 PM
  • Brent: Also, I might have missed it, but will it be a H2H cats or points league?
    Yesterday at 11:48:39 PM
  • Daddy: @Brent yes & @Brent CATs
    Yesterday at 11:49:36 PM
  • Daddy: It will all be in the handbook as per usual.
    Yesterday at 11:50:04 PM
  • Daddy: Think MLB LIVE hoop style only not quite as deep scoring in basketball.
    Yesterday at 11:51:08 PM
  • Daddy: We are trying something thats never been done to our knowledge.
    Yesterday at 11:53:06 PM
  • Brent: I like it.
    Yesterday at 11:54:07 PM
  • Daddy: No other basketball league in the world has a Vegas NBA team. Till tonight.
    Yesterday at 11:54:13 PM
  • Daddy: I thought you might. :)
    Yesterday at 11:54:45 PM
  • STLBlues91: Yeah got to figure a solid name out for it
    Yesterday at 11:55:35 PM
  • Daddy: Had a few good suggestions. Just dont be corny.. this represents all of us.
    Yesterday at 11:57:03 PM
  • Daddy: We are the first to give Vegas a suggestion. Lets let it be a good one. Make them take notice.
    Yesterday at 11:57:48 PM
  • STLBlues91: Yeah will research it a bit
    Yesterday at 11:57:58 PM
  • Daddy: One of the NHL signup sheets has 68k views? Thats ridiculous. Where all these people at? We should have 20k leagues.
    Today at 12:00:38 AM
  • Rhino7: I used to use Las Vegas Vipers as a team name
    Today at 12:04:13 AM
  • Daddy: NHL & NCAA have 100k views on the bullpen. Nobody ever looked at that thing. There should be a few more new accounts no? I mean what they looking for. Its a sign up sheet.
    Today at 12:04:17 AM
  • Daddy: Vipers works for me if it does you. Kinda goes with the logo i gave them.
    Today at 12:05:04 AM
  • STLBlues91: Yeah writing down the names sent out and adding a few I find/think of like Las Vegas Legacy and then will narrow them down
    Today at 12:06:47 AM
  • RyanJames5: Can I take the Sonics?
    Today at 12:07:14 AM
  • Brent: Vipers is cool.
    Today at 12:08:08 AM
  • Daddy: Yes sir
    Today at 12:08:19 AM
  • Daddy: I will tentatively put the Vipers until we launch fantrax
    Today at 12:08:59 AM
  • RyanJames5: Very fun idea to expand.
    Today at 12:09:36 AM
  • Daddy: Indeed sir, indeed. What College RJ?
    Today at 12:10:11 AM
  • RyanJames5: Gonzaga
    Today at 12:13:00 AM
  • Daddy: Roger that Zags
    Today at 12:14:13 AM
  • BayAreaBallers: im excited for this a properly run nba dynasty from scratch
    Today at 12:15:51 AM
  • RyanJames5: Thank you sir
    Today at 12:15:59 AM
  • BayAreaBallers: this is my first LIVE that i sstarted from beginning and didnt take over
    Today at 12:16:16 AM
  • BayAreaBallers: NHL and NBA excited to start those from scratch
    Today at 12:16:59 AM
  • Daddy: All the leagues are well run, we just have different ideas.
    Today at 12:17:35 AM
  • Daddy: There is nothing like virgin teams that nobody else has been into. You get to inherit todays rosters. Then take them into the future.
    Today at 12:18:36 AM
  • Daddy: Usually taking over a team is inheriting someones mess which is why it was open. In startup leagues that isnt an issue.
    Today at 12:19:25 AM
  • Daddy: I forgot to text Brian. :doh:
    Today at 12:21:02 AM
  • Daddy: NBA LIVE Pre-Reserve sign up sheet [link] updated!
    Today at 02:31:32 AM