LEAGUE-WIDE VOTE- CASH EXCHANGED IN TRADES

[Braves155]

Option B

[ajm5551]

Magic vote for Option B

Thanks!

[Teton]

A for me

[Billy]

Updated Tally

Option A- 10
Option B- 10

[Billy]

How would everyone feel if we throw in an extra option or 2 to the vote and just start from the beginning? Seems we are stuck in a stand still at 10-10. Some options I've seen suggested are.

1. Drop the amount allowed to a $10m-$15m net cash exchanged on contracts.

2. Instead of a net allowed on roster, change to 25% max allowed to be covered on a player's contract (meaning if a player makes $10m over 4 years, the max that can be paid on them is a total of $20m).

3. Remove the ability to pay on players contracts but instead institute Cash that can be traded that does not tie to a player's contract. Max allowed would be net $15-$25m cash from other teams.


Or should we just stick with the 2 options?

[DynastyDeacon]

If the net cash exchange were changed to $10m I would change my vote from no cash exchanges allowed to voting for $10m net cash exchanges.

If everyone else voted the same (no cash exchanges or allowing cash exchanges) the vote would then be 9 for no cash exchanges and 11 for net cash exchanges of $10m.

If we did a revote at $10m net cash exchange instead of $25m net cash exchanges as an option and no cash exchanges as the other I think everyone that voted for $25m net cash exchanges would vote for $10m net cash exchanges, while myself and possibly others would change our votes to $10m net cash exchanges from no cash exchanges, therefore causing $10m net cash exchanges to win the vote.

$10m net cash exchanges mostly gives the no cash exchange group what they want in league parity and balance and cuts down on most of the circumventing of the cap, while it gives the net $25m cash exchange group what they want in not wanting cash exchanges to go away. I think it would probably work for the majority of managers.

[Interpaga]

We are still undecided on how to vote.
Would it make sense a combination of option 1 and 3 (cash exchanges are allowed and can be tied or not to a player's contract) with a limit of $15m net cash exchanged on an annual basis?
It would allow some additional flexibility in the trades limiting any potential disparity

[Billy]

Vote closed. Please post your vote in the new thread for this vote where there are 5 options to choose from.