Author Topic: RFA and Rookie Contracts  (Read 584 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Vik

  • League Moderator
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2017
  • Posts: 10919
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
  • Newbie
    • :PIT-NFL:
    • :TOR-NBA:
    • :TOR-NHL:
    • :LaSalle:
    • :TOR-MLS:
    • View Profile
RFA and Rookie Contracts
« on: December 12, 2020, 03:24:41 PM »
Based on some inconsistencies brought with initial set up and to ensure we have a uniform rule for all players, I believe the below would be fair changes. Please feel free to weigh in and I have the poll as a simple yes or no. Ideally this can pass but if there is strong objection open to modifying and discussing further, just want things to be conistent. If this does passes changes will be made all together nd will update rules accordingly on games played, plus keep in mind this is mostly a 1 time cleanup.

Reviewing discussion thread and some talk with a few teams via PM in very simple terms we are looking at this:

Players with 0-29 NHL games played start with full rookie contracts
Players with 30+ NHL games played start with actual contract


So players who at this point in time have 0-29 NHL games played in their career would be on a full rookie contract and then once they cross 30 the contract changes to current season + the 2 years and then RFA status like league rules state. Any player right now who has more then 30 NHL games in prior years would start with whatever their actual contract currently is in the NHL.

Note: if you see * beside your player this means they require a call up or free drop. Also if this officially passes from the time it does, I will give 1 week deadline on these guys so you can also consider trades as a way to open spots/cap if needed.

Hopefully below covers everything and most teams not effected much with a few exceptions:


:ANA: Anaheim (Updated)
C Sam Carrick, $0.7m (R) (34GP) -> $0.7m (2020-2021)*
C Isac Lundestrom, $0.7m (R) (30GP) -> $0.9m (2020-2021) [RFA] *
LW/RW Maxime Comtois, $0.7m (R) (39GP) -> $0.8m (2020-2021) [RFA]*
D Brendan Guhle, $0.7m (R) (59GP) -> $0.8m (2021-2022)*


:BOS-NHL: Boston (Updated)
D Calle Rosen, $0.8m (2020-2021) (20GP) -> Not on ELC in real life so no adjustment
C/LW Morgan Frost, $0.9m (2021-2022) [RFA] (20GP) -> $0.9m (R)
RW Julien Gauthier, $0.9m (2020-2021) [RFA] (17GP) -> $0.9m (R)
D Ville Heinola, $0.9m (2022-2023) [RFA] (8GP) -> $0.9m (R)
D Timothy Liljegren, $0.9m (2021-2022) [RFA] (11GP) -> $0.9m (R)
G Jake Oettinger, $0.9m (2021-2022) [RFA] (0GP) -> $0.9m (R)


:CAR-NHL: Carolina
None

:COL-NHL: Colorado (updated)
C/LW Lias Andersson, $0.7m (R) (66GP) -> $0.9m (2020-2021) [RFA] * Already on NHL roster
RW Kiefer Sherwood, $0.7m (R) (60GP) -> $0.8m (2020-2021) (no RFA) *
D Anton Lindholm, $0.7m (R) (66GP) -> $0.7m (2020-2021) (no RFA) *


:EDM: Edmonton
None

:VGK: Las Vegas (Updated)
RW Matt Luff, $0.7m (R) (51GP) -> $0.7m (2020-2021) [RFA]*
D Libor Hajek, $0.7m (R) (33GP) -> $0.8m (2020-2021) [RFA]*
G Matiss Kivlenieks, $0.7m (2020-2021) [RFA] (6GP)-> $0.7m (R)


:LAK: Los Angeles (Updated)
D Nicolas Hague, $0.7m (R) (38GP) -> $0.8m (2021-2022) [RFA] * Already on NHL roster
C/LW Barrett Hayton, $0.9m (2021-2022) [RFA] (20GP) -> $0.9m (R)
G Ilya Samsonov, $0.9m (2020-2021) [RFA] (26GP) -> $0.9m (R)


:MIN-NHL: Minnesota (Updated)
LW Kirill Kaprizov, $0.9m (2020-2021) [RFA] (0GP) -> $0.9m (R)


:MON-NHL: Montreal
C/LW Joseph Blandisi, $0.7m (R) (101GP) -> $0.7m (2020-2021) (no RFA) * Already on NHL roster
D Alexander Romanov, $0.9m (2021-2022) [RFA] (0GP) -> $0.9m (R)
D Cale Fleury, $0.7m (2022-2023) [RFA] (41GP) -> $0.8m (2020-2021) [RFA] * Change to RFA, already on NHL roster
D Gustav Olofsson, $0.7m (R) (59GP) -> $0.8m (2020-2021) [RFA]*


:NAS: Nashville (Updated)
RW Eeli Tolvanen, $0.9m (2020-2021) [RFA] (7GP) -> $0.9m (R)


:NYR: New York (Updated)
D Zach Whitecloud, $0.7m (2021-2022) [RFA] (17GP) -> $0.7m (R)
G Igor Shesterkin, $0.9m (2020-2021) [RFA] (12GP) -> $0.9m (R)


:PIT-NHL: Pittsburgh  (Updated)
D Juuso Valimaki, $0.9m (2020-2021) [RFA] (24GP) -> $0.9m (R)


:SJ: San Jose (Updated)
C/LW Lean Bergmann, $0.8m (2021-2022) [RFA] (12GP) -> $0.8m (R)
C/LW/RW Noah Gregor, $0.8m (2020-2021) [RFA] (28GP) -> $0.8m (R)


:TBL: Tampa Bay
None

:TOR-NHL: Toronto (Updated)
D Rasmus Sandin, $0.9m (2021-2022) [RFA] (28GP) -> $0.9m (R)
C/LW Nicholas Robertson, $0.8m (2022-2023) [RFA] (0GP) -> $0.8m (R)
RW Owen Tippett, $0.9m (2021-2022) [RFA] (7GP) -> $0.9m (R)


:VAN: Vancouver (Updated)
C Josh Norris, $0.9m (2021-2022) [RFA] (3GP) -> $0.9m (R)


These guys were labeled incorrectly as RFA during set up and will be updated to remove but posting so you can see before I do so (this is technically not for discussion, we are only allow true rookie/ELC contracts to hit RFA not real life RFA arbitration rights):

:BOS-NHL: - C/LW Pierre Engvall, $1.3m (2021-2022) [RFA]
:MIN-NHL: - C Joel Eriksson Ek, $1.5m (2020-2021) [RFA]
:NYR: - RW Pavel Buchnevich, $3.3m (2020-2021) [RFA]
:MON-NHL: - LW/RW Artturi Lehkonen, $2.4m (2020-2021) [RFA]
:VAN: - RW Brock Boeser, $5.9m (2021-2022) [RFA]
« Last Edit: December 15, 2020, 02:10:12 AM by Vik »
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline indiansnation

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2014
  • Posts: 20716
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :CLE-NFL:
    • :CLE-NBA:
    • :CLS:
    • :OhioState:
    • :CLS-MLS:
    • :CLE:
    • View Profile
Re: RFA and Rookie Contracts
« Reply #1 on: December 12, 2020, 03:52:25 PM »
I think this is a great idea and is what is best for this league.
funny
0
like
1
dislike
0
No reactions
Members reacted like:
Vik,
No reactions

Offline Shannonlwalker2

  • All-Star
  • ***
  • Join Date: Jan 2020
  • Posts: 1396
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
  • Newbie
    • :MIA-NFL:
    • :Blank:
    • :ANA:
    • :Florida:
    • :LAD:
    • View Profile
Re: RFA and Rookie Contracts
« Reply #2 on: December 12, 2020, 04:09:43 PM »
Nashville is largely unaffected by the proposed changes.
I am in favor of whatever makes this easier for the admins (running a number of leagues myself, easier is better IMO  lol) 
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline jlapo11

  • MVP
  • ****
  • Join Date: Sep 2012
  • Posts: 3085
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :STL-NHL:
    • :Blank:
    • :MON-MLS:
    • View Profile
Re: RFA and Rookie Contracts
« Reply #3 on: December 12, 2020, 04:30:05 PM »
OK for Colorado
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline dmargolese21

  • Rookie
  • *
  • Join Date: Nov 2020
  • Posts: 195
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
  • Newbie
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :blank:
    • View Profile
Re: RFA and Rookie Contracts
« Reply #4 on: December 12, 2020, 04:41:21 PM »
Canucks approve
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline Rob

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2010
  • Posts: 19203
  • Bonus inPoints: 3
    • :NE:
    • :BOS-NBA:
    • :BOS-NHL:
    • :NewHampshire:
    • :NER:
    • :BOS:
    • View Profile
Re: RFA and Rookie Contracts
« Reply #5 on: December 12, 2020, 04:56:07 PM »
 :iatp:
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline Ric_2227

  • All-Star
  • ***
  • Join Date: Jun 2013
  • Posts: 1186
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :TOR-NHL:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: RFA and Rookie Contracts
« Reply #6 on: December 12, 2020, 04:57:02 PM »
Why not (under 40 NHL games played) like Dynasty and Backyard?
I vote yes, I'm just asking.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline Rob

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2010
  • Posts: 19203
  • Bonus inPoints: 3
    • :NE:
    • :BOS-NBA:
    • :BOS-NHL:
    • :NewHampshire:
    • :NER:
    • :BOS:
    • View Profile
Re: RFA and Rookie Contracts
« Reply #7 on: December 12, 2020, 05:00:31 PM »
Why not (under 40 NHL games played) like Dynasty and Backyard?
I vote yes, I'm just asking.

Whether that's a good idea or not isn't really relevant for this change. Maybe bring this up separately for discussion if you feel strongly.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline Vik

  • League Moderator
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2017
  • Posts: 10919
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
  • Newbie
    • :PIT-NFL:
    • :TOR-NBA:
    • :TOR-NHL:
    • :LaSalle:
    • :TOR-MLS:
    • View Profile
Re: RFA and Rookie Contracts
« Reply #8 on: December 12, 2020, 05:02:53 PM »
Why not (under 40 NHL games played) like Dynasty and Backyard?
I vote yes, I'm just asking.

Whether that's a good idea or not isn't really relevant for this change. Maybe bring this up separately for discussion if you feel strongly.

Agree, and for now any other number would have been too drastic of a change given initial set up.

Also appreciate quick and early feedback, looks like this should be good to go but keep it up a day or 2 before finalizing.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline cloud91

  • MVP
  • ****
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 3640
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :Blank:
    • :CHI-NBA:
    • :ANA:
    • :NotreDame:
    • View Profile
Re: RFA and Rookie Contracts
« Reply #9 on: December 12, 2020, 06:27:17 PM »
Ok for :ANA:  :thumbsup:

 :toth:
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
:ANA: Title Town: NHL   :SC-NHL: Champion :SC-NHL: 2017-'18 Season
:PIT-NHL: King Of The Rink (NHL Yahoo GM) :SC-NHL: Champion :SC-NHL: 2014-'15 Season

 

Forum Search


Quick Profile

 
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

* Chat Room

Refresh History
  • Daddy: Baseball FRENZY never stops
    May 04, 2024, 04:28:04 PM
  • Daddy: Weve processed more baseball transactions in one month than i ever remember in any league but NFL LIVE. This is in all my years.
    May 04, 2024, 04:28:45 PM
  • Daddy: And.. thats the goal. If everyone is active and everyone is competitive that has always been the goal.
    May 04, 2024, 04:29:55 PM
  • Braves155: I'm around for talks
    May 04, 2024, 11:01:43 PM
  • dbreer23: bigfry pm
    May 04, 2024, 11:33:46 PM
  • DaveW: braves155 PM
    Yesterday at 08:55:17 AM
  • Braves155: Responded Dave
    Yesterday at 09:18:16 AM
  • Braves155: I'm around for any trade talks. MLB/NFL
    Yesterday at 10:26:07 AM
  • Braves155: PM MtCrushmore
    Yesterday at 10:36:45 AM
  • Braves155: PM Alpha5
    Yesterday at 11:15:16 AM
  • indiansnation: Braves155 pm
    Yesterday at 11:36:03 AM
  • indiansnation: Indians in mlb live looking to make a trade or 2
    Yesterday at 11:47:48 AM
  • indiansnation: Willing to listen to offers on turang 2bb
    Yesterday at 11:48:33 AM
  • Braves155: INdinsnation...I'm looking for another deal or 2 s well in MLB LIVE
    Yesterday at 12:29:05 PM
  • Daddy: Yall gonna be in trouble when the new NCAA football (EA Sports) drops next month on the PS5. That is the GOAT franchise.
    Yesterday at 12:50:37 PM
  • Braves155: Also - NFL LIVE...LFG! Looking to make a move or 2 as well guys!
    Yesterday at 12:51:37 PM
  • indiansnation: Davew pm
    Yesterday at 01:28:18 PM
  • indiansnation: Braves155 send u trade offer u never got back to me
    Yesterday at 01:29:02 PM
  • IndianaBuc: Braves155 PM
    Yesterday at 01:44:32 PM
  • Braves155: Replied IndianaBuc. Indiansnation...will look thru my PMs
    Yesterday at 02:23:52 PM
  • DaveW: back to you Brian
    Yesterday at 02:28:48 PM
  • Braves155: Back Brian
    Yesterday at 02:30:33 PM
  • Daddy: If i have 10 top level AA prospects each in the top 10 of the franchise vs one middle of the road pitcher like Cal Quantrill (or pick a guy) which one of those two packages are more valuable?
    Yesterday at 02:39:26 PM
  • Daddy: If you think its the AA guys send me a pm.
    Yesterday at 02:40:07 PM
  • Daddy: Also... Ive got a nice private island full of beautiful women to sell you. Pay me upfront and i will send you its coordinates. We call it the Virgin Daddy Islands. $5k reserves it for your future.
    Yesterday at 02:41:59 PM
  • dbreer23: Take two to tango, though. Most owners with adequate or surplus SP aren't interested in prospects as they're trying to win now.
    Yesterday at 02:42:54 PM
  • Daddy: Agreed. But most does not equal all.
    Yesterday at 02:45:09 PM
  • Braves155: My issue in LIVE currently is having Strider/Alcantara/Giolito all on the long shelf, so I am more retooling than rebuilding
    Yesterday at 02:46:48 PM
  • Daddy: Also agreed. Top quality pitching probably means not much depth. A few injuries can challenge you. Pitching other than top end pitching has been devalued in fantasy. Everyone wants the stud.
    Yesterday at 02:49:24 PM
  • Braves155: But I myself could use some time on a nudie island with some hot women
    Yesterday at 02:49:45 PM
  • Daddy: I here to tell you that ALL major league pitching is good pitching. A great hitter beats a terrible pitcher just 3 out of 10 times. Which means the worst pitchers > the greatest hitters.
    Yesterday at 02:50:33 PM
  • STLBlues91: Ill be around the rest of the day for any talks
    Yesterday at 03:25:59 PM
  • Brent: Greg Maddux had the best outlook.  He viewed himself as tye dealer/house and you had to beat him.  Just like in the casino, the house nearly always wins.
    Yesterday at 04:33:51 PM
  • Brent: He had that view b/c of his father who was a blackjack dealer in Vegas.
    Yesterday at 04:35:28 PM
  • Daddy: Yes @Brent!! That is it exactly. Pitching is the house & it always wins in the end.
    Yesterday at 05:15:18 PM
  • Daddy: There shouldn't be many innings available in FA in dynasty fantasy leagues IMO. Thats guaranteed money! To hell with High A ball.
    Yesterday at 05:21:23 PM
  • Daddy: Until someone starts a minor league baseball fantasy game or option. Maybe we can petition fantrax? I just dont think they will care for that.
    Yesterday at 05:23:07 PM
  • Daddy: Neither should we (so much). Every league i see is MLB.
    Yesterday at 05:24:17 PM
  • Daddy: Stcesorp meht kcuf
    Yesterday at 05:26:02 PM
  • Daddy: Stcepsorp*
    Yesterday at 05:26:33 PM
  • Braves155: The problem with the minors is not the system as a whole, it is some Farm Systems are more 'elite' at being able to produce talent than others. If you look across MLB teams you can pretty easily tell the great systems from the weaker systems and talent development
    Yesterday at 05:57:14 PM
  • Braves155: With regard to pitching in the Minors...there is  method to the madness. It is all about what you make of it tho. I agree that it can seem certain type arms in the minors are a dime a dozen
    Yesterday at 06:02:39 PM
  • Daddy: Mr Braves you are my guy. There isnt anything wrong with minor league studs or flops. I get it in REAL baseball.
    Yesterday at 06:20:28 PM
  • Daddy: This is fantasy baseball. We dont generate revenue selling prospects and merchandising. Our top farms dont get a write up in Sports Illustrated.
    Yesterday at 06:22:29 PM
  • Daddy: Load up on MLB guys, then near MLB guys, and only then is the quality of your prospects matter. Ya dig ;)
    Yesterday at 06:24:36 PM
  • Brent: I over value minors to a fault, but I am softening on that stance.
    Yesterday at 06:45:54 PM
  • dbreer23: @BigDon you around? Get a hold of me over at FT if you are.
    Yesterday at 08:22:38 PM
  • Daddy: Big ol NFL LIVE trade to get the day started on a Monday.
    Today at 11:03:41 AM
  • Daddy: Congratulations to both GMs
    Today at 11:03:58 AM
  • Daddy: If anyone didnt know.. The Philadelphia Phillies are good at baseball :)
    Today at 11:14:22 AM