ProFSL: Pro Fantasy Sports Leagues
ProFSL Front Office => Franchise NHL: Transactions => Franchise NHL => NHL DYNASTY GM HOME => Franchise NHL: Completed Transactions => Topic started by: gkrajci on September 11, 2010, 06:50:16 PM
-
This comes from Penalties for not clearing roster space/cap for a final bid in Free Agency
"After such a failed bid, the player goes back to the bidding board, leaving off at the highest bid prior to the winning bid, and the 72 hour clock is restarted."
How about: "After such a failed bid, the player goes back to the bidding board, starting at zero." This way, if the manager with the highest bid prior to the winning bid has made a transaction to compensate for not getting the player they bid on (and had assumed they lost), the player is not forced on them, through no fault of their own.
-
This comes from Penalties for not clearing roster space/cap for a final bid in Free Agency
"After such a failed bid, the player goes back to the bidding board, leaving off at the highest bid prior to the winning bid, and the 72 hour clock is restarted."
How about: "After such a failed bid, the player goes back to the bidding board, starting at zero." This way, if the manager with the highest bid prior to the winning bid has made a transaction to compensate for not getting the player they bid on (and had assumed they lost), the player is not forced on them, through no fault of their own.
I like the idea. If a player is bid on and the bidder cannot fulfill his obligation, the bidding should continue from 0.
1st Offense - warning?
2nd Offense - loss of 1st round pick?
3rd and thereafter Offense - %10 cap penalty. these could compound if teams continue to violate the rule after a 3rd offense (i.e. 4th offense is a total of %20 cap penalities, 5th offense = %30, etc.
Shouldn't be too many instances of using more than a warning
-
I support the change as well :koolaid:
-
I like the idea. If a player is bid on and the bidder cannot fulfill his obligation, the bidding should continue from 0.
1st Offense - warning?
2nd Offense - loss of 1st round pick?
3rd and thereafter Offense - %10 cap penalty. these could compound if teams continue to violate the rule after a 3rd offense (i.e. 4th offense is a total of %20 cap penalities, 5th offense = %30, etc.
Shouldn't be too many instances of using more than a warning
If you are trading draft picks then the loss of a pick may not warrant enough punishment. I like a warning followed by a cap penalty.
-
will someone draw up the official language? thanks
-
Official rule change, i need votes on each.
Amendment #1: "After such a failed bid, the player goes back to the bidding board, starting at zero."
Amendment #2: First violation is a warning, second is a 5% cap penalty, third and after are compounding 10% cap penalties.
-
I agree Chris on both amendments.
-
I vote yes on #1 and #2
-
Yes
-
This was approved :judge: