ProFSL: Pro Fantasy Sports Leagues

ProFSL Front Office => Franchise GM: Transactions => Franchise GM => MLB DYNASTY GM HOME => Franchise GM: Completed Transactions => Topic started by: bridgestone on April 05, 2010, 03:59:40 PM

Title: Rockies, Cubs trada
Post by: bridgestone on April 05, 2010, 03:59:40 PM

guzman + maloney for lowell, reddick & 8m?

:CHC: to :COL:
RP Maloney, Matt, $0.5m (P-n/a)
RP Angel Guzman $2 (2012)

:COL: to :CHC:
CI Lowell, Mike, $12.5m (2010) + $8m cash in 2010
OF Reddick, Josh, $0.5m (P-n/a)
7-3 COL (from DET)

Lowell is useless to me, but for helping the cash-struck Rockies out, I get a decent-mid round pick and another outfield prospect.  I have no need for Guzman and Maloney long-term with Brackman and Robertson coming to Chicago. 

My team is becoming even more liquid for 2011. :taco:

Title: Re: Rockies, Cubs trada
Post by: h4cheng on April 05, 2010, 04:01:09 PM

Agreed.

Finally got some cap room to work with.

Title: Re: Rockies, Cubs trada
Post by: h4cheng on April 05, 2010, 04:05:57 PM

Wait, I just realized that I am throw in 8M. I thought Cubs was taking 8M of Lowell's deal. This is a case of bad communication on my part. Cubs lets discuss a bit more in private.

Title: Re: Rockies, Cubs trada
Post by: Colby on April 05, 2010, 05:27:18 PM

Quote from: h4cheng on April 05, 2010, 04:05:57 PM

Wait, I just realized that I am throw in 8M. I thought Cubs was taking 8M of Lowell's deal. This is a case of bad communication on my part. Cubs lets discuss a bit more in private.

The Cubs wouldn't be able to take $8m of Lowell's deal.  All money has to cover a contract and go with it, not against it.

Title: Re: Rockies, Cubs trada
Post by: h4cheng on April 05, 2010, 05:57:18 PM

Quote from: Colby on April 05, 2010, 05:27:18 PM

The Cubs wouldn't be able to take $8m of Lowell's deal.  All money has to cover a contract and go with it, not against it.

I meant Cub's assuming 8m of Lowell's contract

Title: Re: Rockies, Cubs trada
Post by: bridgestone on April 05, 2010, 06:04:30 PM

We are reworking this deal.

Title: Re: Rockies, Cubs trada
Post by: h4cheng on April 05, 2010, 06:19:33 PM

OK, New Deal:

Cubs
RP Guzman, Angel, $2m (2012)
P Maloney, Matt, $0.5m (P-n/a)

Rockies
2.5M of Lowell's Deal
OF Reddick, Josh, $0.5m (P-n/a)
CI Lowell, Mike, $12.5m (2010)

I agree and apologize for the confusion.

Title: Re: Rockies, Cubs trada
Post by: bridgestone on April 05, 2010, 06:21:43 PM

You didn't post the picks.

Title: Re: Rockies, Cubs trada
Post by: h4cheng on April 05, 2010, 06:49:58 PM

Not a good day for me, version trois:

OK, New Deal:

Cubs
RP Guzman, Angel, $2m (2012)
P Maloney, Matt, $0.5m (P-n/a)

Rockies
2.5M of Lowell's Deal
OF Reddick, Josh, $0.5m (P-n/a)
CI Lowell, Mike, $12.5m (2010)
7-3 COL (from DET)
8-3 COL (from DET)
9-3 COL (from DET)
10-3 COL (from DET)

I agree and apologize for the confusion.

Title: Re: Rockies, Cubs trada
Post by: bridgestone on April 05, 2010, 07:01:37 PM

Quote from: h4cheng on April 05, 2010, 06:49:58 PM

Not a good day for me, version trois:

OK, New Deal:

Cubs
RP Guzman, Angel, $2m (2012)
P Maloney, Matt, $0.5m (P-n/a)

Rockies
2.5M of Lowell's Deal
OF Reddick, Josh, $0.5m (P-n/a)
CI Lowell, Mike, $12.5m (2010)
7-3 COL (from DET)
8-3 COL (from DET)
9-3 COL (from DET)
10-3 COL (from DET)

I agree and apologize for the confusion.

 :iatp:  I ACCEPT... I get top picks in the late rounds thanks to deals of the past... my pitching prospect in Maloney is switched over for more offensive prospects.  I pay the price by taking in Lowell's crap deal for this year.  I'm not competing this year, so taking on Lowell for one year isn't a bad price for the farm enhancement.

Title: Re: Rockies, Cubs trada
Post by: BHows on April 06, 2010, 05:24:11 AM

Approved

Title: Re: Rockies, Cubs trada
Post by: Needle Juice on April 06, 2010, 08:18:01 AM

 :iatp:

Looks like a good return for taking on the Lowell contract. 

Title: Re: Rockies, Cubs trada
Post by: guak2005 on April 07, 2010, 05:39:31 PM

 :iatp: