ProFSL: Pro Fantasy Sports Leagues
ProFSL Front Office => Franchise GM: Transactions => Franchise GM => MLB DYNASTY GM HOME => Franchise GM: Invalid Transactions => Topic started by: Colby on July 05, 2011, 11:51:51 AM
-
We once again have inactive members of our TC and have been dealing with huge uproars over trade decisions. I say we give the ProFSL TC (to be established shortly) a try as it eliminates bias, streamlines approval processes, and gives more information to the decisions as the ProFSL TC will be required to give reasons why they approved or rejected a trade.
Participating leagues would move trades to a special board. Pro TC members who have a knowledge of the rules of participating leagues as well as their scoring systems would vote on the trade and provide reasons why they approve or veto. Trades do not necessarily have to have equal value as everyone values players differently. The TC is paid in the form of ProFSL points for that sport's Invitational. Once a decision is made, the trade thread is moved back to the transactions board of the league. Players involved in the pending trade may not be moved while trade is in the voting stage. The TC board could be ten people deep with perhaps only four approvals needed so that a trade doesn't need to wait for every TC member to vote. This speeds up the process for all leagues and adds a governing body outside the league.
YAY - Colby
NAY -
-
nay...we however do need some more active tc members
-
nay...we however do need some more active tc members
How can I change your mind? A unified ProFSL TC will be much more active than any TC we have in any one league.
-
I will also vote no. I dont think a unified TC would improve the current situation. I have tried to stay out of trade critique that does not involve me and noticed that others are also doing the same. Also, I am not comfortable with strangers who might not completely understand the intricacies of this league to vote on deals. One could read the rulebook 100 times but until you are in the league for a period of time, you can never have a full grasp of all the dynamics.
-
With Ben a likely Nay, this appears to have been shot down with a 1-3 vote. I hope to bring this up again in the offseason. With that said, we may need new TC members who are active. I believe Dan wanted to rejoin the TC. Any other takers?
-
ill join. the current tc is a joke. (not all members) but some of these guys need to be relieved of the TC duty. Two members are just not active enough to have the job.
Dan
Rob
Daniel
Papps
All are very active.
-
ill join. the current tc is a joke. (not all members) but some of these guys need to be relieved of the TC duty. Two members are just not active enough to have the job.
Dan
Rob
Daniel
Papps
All are very active.
Mr.Tradeking has gone on a summer break, and joeshmoe is just not active enough
-
I will join as well if you need 2 new members.
-
I will join as well if you need 2 new members.
You, Corey, and Dan should all join. We also need another RC member - preferably Rob or Mike Bailey to represent the smaller markets.
-
You, Corey, and Dan should all join. We also need another RC member - preferably Rob or Mike Bailey to represent the smaller markets.
I propose Corey to join the rules committee.
-
ill join. the current tc is a joke. (not all members) but some of these guys need to be relieved of the TC duty. Two members are just not active enough to have the job.
Dan
Rob
Daniel
Papps
All are very active.
Jeff is very active as well. Seems like the holiday weekend threw some people off.
-
Jeff is very active as well. Seems like the holiday weekend threw some people off.
you are correct, i forgot about Jeff. Sorry Jeff :koolaid:
-
Correct, I would probably vote Nay. I'd be open to discussing during the offseason, but I think the intricacies of our league are not to be underestimated. I think many of the trades that do get vetoed (or should be) are a direct result of one owner not understanding them, whether it be player value or transaction options like our extension and release rules.