ProFSL: Pro Fantasy Sports Leagues

ProFSL Front Office => Franchise GM: Transactions => Franchise GM => MLB DYNASTY GM HOME => Franchise GM: Invalid Transactions => Topic started by: molinator on January 09, 2011, 09:23:41 PM

Title: Marlins/Angels deal
Post by: molinator on January 09, 2011, 09:23:41 PM

 :LAA: acquire:
MI Getz, Chris, $0.5m (P-2012)

 :FL: acquire:
SP Volquez, Edinson, $2.5m (2012)
1
It's nice having Volquez back in my team and this trade will complete The Marlins rotation! :taco:
Angels to confirm

Title: Re: Marlins/Angels deal
Post by: Dan Wood on January 10, 2011, 12:18:08 AM

I cannot approve this trade. A young starter with ace potential, with a good contract, for a back-up infielder. I understand the Angels are trying to cut payroll, but this deal is fairly lopsided. It's not like Volquez's contract is the one that is weighing down the payroll of the Angels.

I would need to hear more explanation as to why this deal is being agreed to. It is also hard for me to believe that this is the best that Volquez could get in return. Again, this is just my opinion, and maybe the other members of the TC feel differently.

Title: Re: Marlins/Angels deal
Post by: nerwffej on January 10, 2011, 07:37:29 AM

I feel same Dan volquez 1 more year from injury potential is there to be ace and Getz never proved worth more then backup

Title: Re: Marlins/Angels deal
Post by: Needle Juice on January 10, 2011, 09:05:58 AM

I am in agreement with Dan, can not approve this deal.

Title: Re: Marlins/Angels deal
Post by: guak2005 on January 10, 2011, 04:14:29 PM

The Angels have yet to answer, I too think that it is very lopsided. Having traded for Volquez and traded him away, I have seen lots of value go back and forth for him. Getz is clearly not enough. But I do believe that before doing a veto the Angels should get an opportunity to explain themselves.

Title: Re: Marlins/Angels deal
Post by: Colby on January 12, 2011, 02:53:59 PM

I would like to see an explanation... this trade is way too lopsided.

Title: Re: Marlins/Angels deal
Post by: Colby on January 16, 2011, 03:56:07 PM

 :bump: ??? ???

Title: Re: Marlins/Angels deal
Post by: Dan Wood on January 16, 2011, 10:14:43 PM

I think the TC has spoken regardless. The two parties have one of two options, change the mind of the TC, or change the deal. This is being moved to invalid in the meantime.