ProFSL: Pro Fantasy Sports Leagues

Fantasy Leagues => Franchise GM: Archives => Franchise GM: History Books => Franchise GM => MLB Leagues => Franchise GM: FGM Commissioner News & Tid Bits => Topic started by: MillerTime on May 22, 2011, 08:39:19 PM

Title: TC
Post by: MillerTime on May 22, 2011, 08:39:19 PM

I have talked with Colby and we will be reaching out to fill two (2) TC vacancies.  You should see this happen soon.

Title: Re: TC
Post by: MillerTime on May 22, 2011, 10:13:05 PM

Papps, PHI, will be filling one of the positions on the TC.

Title: Re: TC
Post by: MillerTime on May 22, 2011, 10:51:14 PM

Jake has joined as well. 

Both guys are vets that have a very good feel for the league.

Thanks

Title: Re: TC
Post by: bravesfan4 on May 23, 2011, 01:58:22 AM

who left the TC

Title: Re: TC
Post by: MillerTime on May 23, 2011, 08:02:49 AM

Dan Wood is not on TC anymore.  I talked with Colby and we went with a 6 person TC.  I believe the other spot was vacant.  We were having a problem with getting the appropriate votes on all of the trades over the last 5 days.

Title: Re: TC
Post by: rcankosy on May 23, 2011, 08:50:00 AM

Guys,

We have a TC in another of my leagues.  We have an odd number of owners to avoid ties, plus we have 2 alternates in case the trade involves two owners on the TC.  Also, we have a 48 hour time limit for the TC to rule on the trade.  It's a simple yes/no vote.

Roy

Title: Re: TC
Post by: rcankosy on May 23, 2011, 11:01:05 AM

Are there any formal rules regarding the TC?  I took a quick glance, and maybe I missed it.  I am curious about the number of TC members and how many votes are required to approve a trade.

Title: Re: TC
Post by: MillerTime on May 23, 2011, 11:07:50 AM

Roy,

It used to be there.  Currently it is 3 approvals to approve a trade of the 6 on TC. 

With the two new members, we have seven (7) members on the current TC.  We are confirming the all of the previous members still want to remain on.  We are discussing your other suggestions, with Colby on vacation, this may not happen til he gets back. 

Title: Re: TC
Post by: Daniel on May 23, 2011, 11:50:10 AM

Two votes against are enough to veto right?

Title: Re: TC
Post by: MillerTime on May 23, 2011, 11:51:22 AM

I believe so, GMs are offered a renegotiation at that time. 

Title: Re: TC
Post by: Colby on June 28, 2011, 01:45:21 PM

FYI, the Pirates/Yankees deal was approved 4-2.

Deals that involve zero TC members can be approved 4-2, 4-1, 4-0
Involving one TC member can be approved 4-1, 4-0
Involving two TC member can be approved 3-1, 3-0

Title: Re: TC
Post by: rcankosy on June 28, 2011, 09:26:34 PM

Quote from: Colby on June 28, 2011, 01:45:21 PM

FYI, the Pirates/Yankees deal was approved 4-2.

Deals that involve zero TC members can be approved 4-2, 4-1, 4-0
Involving one TC member can be approved 4-1, 4-0
Involving two TC member can be approved 3-1, 3-0

A simpler way of saying what you said might be:

Trades involving 0 TC members require 3 vetoes to disapprove.
Trades involving 1 or more TC members require 2 vetoes to disapprove.

I'm not sure why there would be a different standard for TC members.

Title: Re: TC
Post by: OUDAN on June 28, 2011, 09:52:01 PM

i would think the reason is the TC members in the trade shouldnt be able to vote....

Title: Re: TC
Post by: rcankosy on June 28, 2011, 10:06:28 PM

We could have two alternates in case the trade involved 1 or more TC members.

Title: Re: TC
Post by: Brewers GM on June 28, 2011, 11:47:01 PM

Quote from: rcankosy on June 28, 2011, 10:06:28 PM

We could have two alternates in case the trade involved 1 or more TC members.

I think this would be a good improvement.

Title: Re: TC
Post by: OUDAN on June 29, 2011, 12:18:05 AM

i agree with u guys great solution but im also with colby on a profsl TC