0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Here's a modified version to the current rule proposal for regular season tiebreakers...If two or more teams in a division are tied for a playoff spot then the order of tiebreakers is determined by:1) Head to head record2) Divisional record3) Fantasy points scoredIf such teams are not in the same division then the only tiebreaker used will be fantasy points scored in the regular season.
Personally, I just don't get the push for head-to-head even if we do play 2 or 3 times. I'd much prefer divisional record and then points, where we know we won't have to worry about small sample sizes being an issue.
Here's a modified version to the current rule proposal for regular season tiebreakers...If two or more teams in a division are tied for a playoff spot then the order of tiebreakers is determined by:1) Head to head record2) Divisional record3) Fantasy points scored
Here is what i got so far, it very just a little bit from this. week 10 and 11 are interleague. you will play each div team twice. then everyone once in ur conference. it will vary just a tad, like the nl central will not play one team in the nl and the al west might play each other 3 times instead of 2. but im gona make it as real as possible.and we will start and end the season with division games
In my opinion, if a team were to play a division rival twice or three times in a season, and beat them the majority, that should take precedent over total points scored (if they were to have a tie in record). This isn't roto baseball, it's head to head, so total points shouldn't matter here.Good point Jake!