Hall of Fame Inductees

[Tony]

Sundin, Sakic, Oates and Bure enter HOF. 


How would you rate them from 1-4?

[Mariner]

All great players but this is how I would rate them

1- Sakic
2- Sundin
3- Oates
4- Bure

[Eric]

All great players but this is how I would rate them

1- Sakic
2- Sundin
3- Oates
4- Bure

I agree

[Drew]

All great players but this is how I would rate them

1- Sakic
2- Sundin
3- Oates
4- Bure

I might put Oates ahead of Sundin because he was a winner. Sundin was a very good player but never proved to be a winner, even though he never won a cup, he did lead many teams in the playoffs to the finals.

[Jonathan]

I liked Sundin a lot, but yeah he wasn't very clutch and played under the 'ole Microscope in TOR.

[Tony]

If you made your list based on just skill would Bure Still be last?

[Drew]

If you made your list based on just skill would Bure Still be last?

No Bure would be 2nd for me. Lots of skill but there is more to the rankings than that.

[Tony]

No Bure would be 2nd for me. Lots of skill but there is more to the rankings than that.

Yes I agree. I was just wondering what people thought. 

[kangol]

After Gilmour left, Sundin never got to play with any other star calibre forward.  Mogilny was good for a few years but most of Mats seasons were with Renberg, Berezin, Steve Thomas, Modin, Tucker....you get my point. 
To put up a point a game for his career is unreal. Management is to blame for them not making a cup. Not Sundin.

For me it goes Sakic, Mats, Oates, Bure for careers.
As for skill. Bure, Sakic, Oates, Sundin.