Author Topic: PROPOSED: 5 Rule Revision for Goalies  (Read 5665 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline PigsRule

  • League Moderator
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2011
  • Posts: 7161
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :blank:
    • View Profile
Re: PROPOSED: 5 Rule Revision for Goalies
« Reply #20 on: September 04, 2012, 11:37:55 AM »
Maybe reduce it to 1 starting goalie, ...


the 1 active goalie option appears to be a leading candidate for rule revision in 2013-14.

gocubsgo7, can you clarify / give an example of what you mean when you say a
Quote
... and then a 50% reduction in salary on your backup goalie?

...not sure i follow. thx!
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Florida Panthers ... link to team page

2023-24 FRANCHISE NHL PAYOUT TO CHAMPION ... :money: $530.00USD :money:
ONLY THE BEST OWNERS WANTED


Offline PigsRule

  • League Moderator
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2011
  • Posts: 7161
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :blank:
    • View Profile
Re: PROPOSED: 5 Rule Revision for Goalies
« Reply #21 on: September 04, 2012, 12:02:48 PM »
My formal proposal.

Effective immediately - 1 active goalie on the roster. 
Reason- We are a league that pride ourselves on mimicking the NHL, what NHL team has two goalies in net at the same time.  NHL teams have to choose every night who they play is it Quick or Bernier.

disagree with any effective immediately rules. even though the goalie situation is not favorable - the league can be played as is short-term. the goalie situation was the result of the rules in place BUT also the lack of quality team owners (ones who cared not to trade away their starting goalie for a bag o'pucks, then ditch their team after a few months).

on that note, as you know snugerud... FNHL recruiting is more selective this season and i hope it will continue to be moving forward to ensure knowledgeable owners and ones with sufficient time to play fantasy hky commit to the league.


Quote
Starting in 2013-2014 - Before free agency all teams have a one time option of dropping a goalie with no cap hit.  This gives teams that have grossly salary inflated goalies on their roster a chance to drop them without receiving a penalty, this counteracts the drop in goalie value.  Those teams would have a chance to re-sign them in FA at a lower cost and more in line with the future goalie values.

i'd love to hear more ppl comment on this goalie amnesty option. it's got legs!  :toast:
also, we have time to flesh this idea out to determine if we move fwd, the exact mechanics of how to implement from start to finish. remember, we cannot devalue goalies overnight otherwise the time and effort invested by those who have cared to do so isn't swept aside and forgotten. we need to try to find a good balance of change vs stability... easier said then done.  :toth:



Quote
Alternate option: Teams all have the opportunity to extend their goaltenders with the new contract set to take effect immediately regardless of the number of years left on the contract.  It's basically a goalie reset without really removing anyone from teams rosters.  I am not as big on this option since it gives teams that bid ridiculous contracts on goalie to have their cake and eat it too. By making them drop them and bid on a open market seems to be the more fair root to everyone since the high priced goalies were acquired on the open market in the first place. 

personally not a fan of this either. but still good to get new ideas flowing.  :toast:


Quote
Also starting in 2013 season a 10% reduction in goalie stats , with successive 10% reductions in the following 3 years.
Reason: This will bring the leagues top goalie points in line with the leagues top skaters points.  No one can tell me that Fleury is more important than Crosby or Malkin to his team, to mimic the NHL we need to bring goalie points to a more realistic value.

agreed.

i personally believe a revision to goalie scoring needs to happen to get them more in line with overall league scoring system. you can play with 4 starting goalies and 0 Centers + 0 LW and still make the post-season because points are so heavily weighted on goalie stats scoring.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Florida Panthers ... link to team page

2023-24 FRANCHISE NHL PAYOUT TO CHAMPION ... :money: $530.00USD :money:
ONLY THE BEST OWNERS WANTED


joeshmoe

  • Guest
Re: PROPOSED: 5 Rule Revision for Goalies
« Reply #22 on: September 05, 2012, 12:25:24 PM »
If you want to limit starting goalies to one, its understandable, because that is league like.  2 goalies was implemented so teams could start the two goalies they had without having to find out the starter from the real nhl team every single night.  It didn't work.

But to cap the amount that can be spent on goalies is foolish.  If you want to create a maleficence in the market, that is exactly what you will do.

 If two teams bid at the same dollar cap, who wins?  Am I to believe that some arbitrator can possibly be unbiased and make an honest decision?  Outrageous!  Am I instead to think that the winner will be determined by some calculations of standings or points or etc?  How insane!  It changes the league completely.  Instead of teams trying to win they will be trying to position themselves for players.  Yuck.

Please leave caps of contracts, and all these multiple-calculation objectives out.  It makes this league less fun and more work. 
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

joeshmoe

  • Guest
Re: PROPOSED: 5 Rule Revision for Goalies
« Reply #23 on: September 05, 2012, 12:32:59 PM »
As I said about re-drafting before, how gross.

It rips apart what teams have done and is force by the administration.  People should be able to maybe enter into the re-draft system or not.  Because I am not going to take my chances I get a Tukka Rask back.  Who would get to go first and who last?  That cannot be decided fairly. 
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

joeshmoe

  • Guest
Re: PROPOSED: 5 Rule Revision for Goalies
« Reply #24 on: September 05, 2012, 12:59:13 PM »
Also note, bringing it down to one starter really puts the screws to contracts like Ben Bishop, Craig Anderson, etc.  That is why these rule changes really need to be done now and stay that way, for a while.  This league has been a stream of rule changes. 
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline snugerud

  • MVP
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jul 2011
  • Posts: 4392
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
  • I am the ghost of fantasy hockey past
    • :NE:
    • :TOR-NBA:
    • :PIT-NHL:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: PROPOSED: 5 Rule Revision for Goalies
« Reply #25 on: September 07, 2012, 11:16:28 AM »
If you want to limit starting goalies to one, its understandable, because that is league like.  2 goalies was implemented so teams could start the two goalies they had without having to find out the starter from the real nhl team every single night.  It didn't work.

I see this as an advanced league and having to find out who the starting goalie is not that big of deal.  http://www.leftwinglock.com/starting-goalies/  if you have a starting goalie, most nights your going to role with them, backups are a little more work.

Quote

    Also starting in 2013 season a 10% reduction in goalie stats , with successive 10% reductions in the following 3 years.
    Reason: This will bring the leagues top goalie points in line with the leagues top skaters points.  No one can tell me that Fleury is more important than Crosby or Malkin to his team, to mimic the NHL we need to bring goalie points to a more realistic value.


agreed.

i personally believe a revision to goalie scoring needs to happen to get them more in line with overall league scoring system. you can play with 4 starting goalies and 0 Centers + 0 LW and still make the post-season because points are so heavily weighted on goalie stats scoring.

Here is an alternate idea. Since we are already devaluing goalies by the 1 starter why not instead of continuing to devalue goalies and further hurting the teams that have them ,  we increase the value of skater (D's and F's) to close some of the gap on the goalies.  Instead of hurting the teams with goalies , it would help the teams with none to be more competitive.  It would also bring the value up on D to bring them more inline with their contracts which is already being discussed as well so you are killing 2 birds with 1 stone. 

I am proposing a initial 25% increase to all skater stats and the addition of a blocked shots stat counted at the same value as hits.
« Last Edit: September 07, 2012, 11:19:55 AM by snugerud »
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Bro-Lo El Cunado

Offline PigsRule

  • League Moderator
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2011
  • Posts: 7161
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :blank:
    • View Profile
Re: PROPOSED: 5 Rule Revision for Goalies
« Reply #26 on: September 07, 2012, 12:27:59 PM »
Also note, bringing it down to one starter really puts the screws to contracts like Ben Bishop, Craig Anderson, etc.  That is why these rule changes really need to be done now and stay that way, for a while.  This league has been a stream of rule changes. 

i know you hate to see others touch your original vision of the league... but let me say i'm here this yr to clarify rules that are unclear, seriously lacking or harmful the the league's ability to survive.

examples of needed rule changes... see COMMISSIONER'S CORNER but here's a taste:

1. Goalie setup + scoring: didn't factor in hoarding, mis-management
2. Cap league with no penalty for below or over cap after 2 full seasons
3. Unclear contract terms that cause confusion for 3 ex-commissioners (hf6k, gilly, sizzrat) + 1 roving commish (drew) ... includes 1yr contracts, variable contracts, extensions on 1yr deals, etc.

* leaving these issues unaddressed hurts/has hurt the league.
* addressing them is like teething, it's a beach but you're better for it afterwards.

and no, not everything can be handled like a band-aid... we have to respect those who've put in 2 full seasons as well as juggle needs of new active owners.

see it as "glass half-full" chris... not the other way. :thumbsup:
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Florida Panthers ... link to team page

2023-24 FRANCHISE NHL PAYOUT TO CHAMPION ... :money: $530.00USD :money:
ONLY THE BEST OWNERS WANTED


Offline PigsRule

  • League Moderator
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2011
  • Posts: 7161
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :blank:
    • View Profile
Re: PROPOSED: 5 Rule Revision for Goalies
« Reply #27 on: September 07, 2012, 12:44:24 PM »
I see this as an advanced league and having to find out who the starting goalie is not that big of deal.  http://www.leftwinglock.com/starting-goalies/  if you have a starting goalie, most nights your going to role with them, backups are a little more work.

haha, good stuff. i use http://www.dailyfaceoff.com/starting-goalies/
much more relevant in smaller leagues that start 2 goalies with daily line-ups like my CHL 42 team tiered league.



Here is an alternate idea. Since we are already devaluing goalies by the 1 starter why not instead of continuing to devalue goalies and further hurting the teams that have them ,  we increase the value of skater (D's and F's) to close some of the gap on the goalies.  Instead of hurting the teams with goalies , it would help the teams with none to be more competitive.  It would also bring the value up on D to bring them more inline with their contracts which is already being discussed as well so you are killing 2 birds with 1 stone. 

I am proposing a initial 25% increase to all skater stats and the addition of a blocked shots stat counted at the same value as hits.

if i'm not mistaken, that's the other side of the same coin. same idea just change the skaters instead of the goalies. it's good food for thought for sure.

i personlly love using blocked shots, makes the defensive defensemen + 2-way fwds/plumbers more relevant in scoring.

of course from an administrative perspective the considerations are:
a) changing a set of scoring values (looks like it's gotta be done either way)
b) scoring impacts contract values too, now we're touching 3 positions vs 1 ... and contracts are already a can o' worms.
c) by touching skaters, we might now cause another negative impacts downstream that haven't been anticipated (butterfly effect).

on the positive side, it means less revisions to goalies as ppl may not want too many changes to goalie setup + scoring.


great to get new ideas to tackle this matter. thx snug!
let's see more input on this idea from snug!
:toast:
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Florida Panthers ... link to team page

2023-24 FRANCHISE NHL PAYOUT TO CHAMPION ... :money: $530.00USD :money:
ONLY THE BEST OWNERS WANTED


Offline snugerud

  • MVP
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jul 2011
  • Posts: 4392
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
  • I am the ghost of fantasy hockey past
    • :NE:
    • :TOR-NBA:
    • :PIT-NHL:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: PROPOSED: 5 Rule Revision for Goalies
« Reply #28 on: September 07, 2012, 01:25:20 PM »
just a side, you can alter values of scoring in Fantrax and run tests to see how they turn out which will help reduce some of this butterfly effect.

It is same coin different side but with a big difference. Not everyone in the league has a starting goalie so by reducing the goalie stats you are only affecting those with a starting goalie and in a negative way.

By up ticking the skaters this will affect everyone's team typically in a positive way, some more than others but in probably a less dramatic sense. 

I am just kicking around ideas out loud.  Anybody can feel free to jump in
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Bro-Lo El Cunado

Offline PsychoticPondGoons

  • League Moderator
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2012
  • Posts: 10292
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :BAL-NFL:
    • :Blank:
    • :PHI-NHL:
    • :NYY:
    • View Profile
Re: PROPOSED: 5 Rule Revision for Goalies
« Reply #29 on: September 07, 2012, 04:37:25 PM »
Bro weren't you the original commissioner. When was this league weekly line-ups. So what is it weekly or daily line-ups.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
PPG's Theme Song EC Lucky X - Welcome Spring2020
PPG's Chill Vibes Thrift Shop - Macklemore & Ryan Lewis
Live to brawl. - J.Yablonski
"I don't like to hurt people. Sometimes I just can't help it." - George Steinbrenner :NYY:


23-24 FNHL Champion TBD will win the  $530.00 PAYOUT!


Best Fantasy Hockey League (25$ returning team fee 2024-25):
FNHL TEAMS FOR SALE!
:Commish: *** :CAR-NHL: HURRICANES :CAR-NHL: *** :Commish:


 


* FNHL Chat

Sorry, this shoutbox does not exist.

Forum Search


Quick Profile

 
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

* Chat Room

Refresh History
  • Daddy: Profsl had a bunch of pencil dik crooks on it. All over the place. Corrupt LMs orchestrating trades to try to pre determine who won.
    Yesterday at 10:50:57 AM
  • Daddy: To keep the money between "certain guys". That way it stayed in house and they just kept robbing fools.
    Yesterday at 10:51:49 AM
  • Daddy: I created LIVE because LIVE is what those fake ass leagues were supposed to be.
    Yesterday at 10:52:24 AM
  • Daddy: Real competition. Where your competition cant cheat ya and anyone that beats ya deserved to do so.
    Yesterday at 10:53:15 AM
  • Daddy: All those bums & crooks & morons have either left profsl for good or they stay in the background, watching, and gossiping behind my back like a bunch of street corner hookers.
    Yesterday at 10:54:41 AM
  • Daddy: Now all we do on profsl is play ball.
    Yesterday at 10:55:51 AM
  • Daddy: How did i win a money league that they were cheating in? Because if you cheat, you still gotta be right about the players. They were smart at being crooks. Dumb at building teams.
    Yesterday at 10:59:54 AM
  • OUDAN: I miss money dynasty lesgues
    Yesterday at 11:27:47 AM
  • OUDAN: Ran correctly that is
    Yesterday at 11:28:50 AM
  • Daddy: Agreed Dan. This site was popping 14 years ago with half ass product. Every league here today offers a unique top quality product.
    Yesterday at 01:09:03 PM
  • Daddy: Upcoming $$$ league [link] Powerhouse Baseball @Alpha5 (LIVE moderator) LM.
    Yesterday at 01:57:27 PM
  • OUDAN: Need a $$ basketball league badly
    Yesterday at 02:58:32 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: I finally finalized my first off-season trade in CCD
    Yesterday at 03:17:54 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: Trading away PJ washington
    Yesterday at 03:18:02 PM
  • Daddy: @Dan Powerhouse is coming to all sports. 20 player redraft concept using LIVE style scoring.
    Yesterday at 04:58:27 PM
  • Daddy: Powerhouse hockey 30 player & football 53 player redraft.... Basketball is 15 players i think but these are in concept stages except baseball. Powerhouse Baseball 2025 is coming.
    Yesterday at 05:02:29 PM
  • Daddy: Powerhouse = $$$ & redraft.
    Yesterday at 05:03:34 PM
  • Daddy: NHL LIVE SS [link]
    Yesterday at 06:25:27 PM
  • Braves155: Evening gents. Anyone up for trade talks?
    Yesterday at 08:44:25 PM
  • IndianaBuc: Sure
    Yesterday at 09:06:09 PM
  • Braves155: NFL LIVE - Speak my language if you are moving 1sts or early 2nds
    Yesterday at 09:30:35 PM
  • Daddy: Have you seen that Man's team? If Buc had picks we would have no chance.
    Yesterday at 09:59:34 PM
  • STLBlues91: Ill be around for deals for a few hours for any leagues I am in.
    Yesterday at 10:04:43 PM
  • STLBlues91: I just went through my MIA roster and think I only have 2-3 guys on offense from when I took the team 2 years ago. Lots of chaos and turnover
    Yesterday at 10:07:09 PM
  • indiansnation: Daddy pm
    Yesterday at 10:48:32 PM
  • Bigdon: Any chance I well get a nfl live team
    Yesterday at 10:54:00 PM
  • Daddy: Win the National Championship in NCAA LIVE and you are guaranteed an NFL LIVE Team.
    Today at 12:05:13 AM
  • BayAreaBallers: What a nightmare
    Today at 02:55:08 AM
  • BayAreaBallers: *night
    Today at 02:55:17 AM
  • Daddy: @BAB you had a bad dream?
    Today at 12:13:27 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: PM Billy
    Today at 12:32:28 PM
  • Daddy: Nice trade boyz (Jim/Brent) congratulations to you both!
    Today at 12:48:24 PM
  • Daddy: @Jim yo ass is an amazing baseball GM. Football must not be your sport. Watching you build these Cardinals from scratch is high high level gm Crap. Keep doing ya thing.
    Today at 12:58:17 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: meant to say night not nightmare lol
    Today at 02:11:50 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: hows everyone doing
    Today at 02:11:58 PM
  • Daddy: @BAB :toth:
    Today at 02:31:18 PM
  • Daddy: I sent Brian a trade offer on profsl, he cussed me out via text and told me to stop smoking so much marijuana :rofl:
    Today at 02:32:51 PM
  • Rhino7: So by winning NCAAF you are guaranteed a team, do you boot someone to make room or what? I’m just speaking as if all GMs were actually active.
    Today at 03:09:13 PM
  • Daddy: In my experience there is always "someone" that should be booted. They dont get booted because most leagues struggle at filling membership. NFL LIVE is so popular i could legit have an NFL LIVE 2 and it would be filled instantly.
    Today at 03:12:51 PM
  • Daddy: Doing that would diminish what NFL LIVE is. Which is why we created NCAA. NCAA supports those wanting an NFL LIVE franchise but cannot get in because we have franchise "holding" GMs.
    Today at 03:14:31 PM
  • Daddy: A "holding" GM is barely active. Never has a chance to win it all and responds to pms from peers after weeks or even months.
    Today at 03:15:24 PM
  • Daddy: If someone wins a 64 team LIVE league. NCAA or not. As hard as it is to win a LIVE league. And we gave all 32 NFL LIVE GMs the chance to win that very same league. Then hell yes. If need be. Some 2-15 GM or likewise that we KNOW isnt doing all they can to get better will be in jeopardy of being replaced.
    Today at 03:17:41 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: essentially this is a feeder for the NFL NBA. gives gusy a chance to prove they can be active and at least do whats needed so that they are considered for nba and nfl live leagues
    Today at 03:19:29 PM
  • Daddy: These leagues arent created and paid for so people can hold them and not do Crap. The purpose is to have the best Dynasty GMs in the world test themselves on an even and realistic playing field. You win a LIVE league. You are a made Man. Period.
    Today at 03:19:48 PM
  • Daddy: @BAB exactly. They are feeder leagues.
    Today at 03:20:05 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: with it being 64 ppl the talent pool for possible replacmenets is high
    Today at 03:21:01 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: and gives you enough to assess
    Today at 03:21:13 PM
  • Daddy: The NCAA League concepts are much simpler. No trading in college. Its recruit, set lineups and go. But the recruiting is essential to winning. A dummy wont win. No dummy will ever win LIVE. Cant luck into it.
    Today at 03:23:24 PM
  • Daddy: And
    Today at 03:23:29 PM
  • Daddy: Im in those leagues. Nobody wins a league im in by luck. They either had some kind of headstart or advantage. But talk smack if you want, if youve been in a league with me, you know wassup. Im bringing the hammer win lose or draw.
    Today at 03:24:52 PM